Got a tip for us?
Let us know
Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
[WW] A simple game - Why not ? THE END
- Thread starter Sythas
- Start date
- Sort by reaction score
This has started with an impressive bang.
And votes piling in already with commendable speed. Not much evidence, but plenty of speed.
Since memory is guiding us, here, on my first game Melrose invited me to join him for some single malt whisky. That hospitality would be ill served by adding to the pile voting for him.
Instead, for now, I'll opt for ravenvii.
And votes piling in already with commendable speed. Not much evidence, but plenty of speed.
Since memory is guiding us, here, on my first game Melrose invited me to join him for some single malt whisky. That hospitality would be ill served by adding to the pile voting for him.
Instead, for now, I'll opt for ravenvii.
Wow, the start of this game snuck up on me - I'll start with Plutonius, for no particular reason.
And I love you too. appleguy123
If you're going to lynch me, at least have the courtesy to plant a tree in my honor, or maybe name the village post office the 'Melrose Was Awesome Memorial Post Office & Single Malt Scotch Bar For Kids Who Can't Read Good'. Or something.
Well, the negotiating, pleading, misdirection and accusations fly………….that is what I think happens in the absence of any compelling evidence to the contrary.
Meanwhile, unless someone else starts to accumulate votes, we have three individuals who may be asked to make a case for their continued presence…
Thus, those of us who have registered a vote for one person will be asked to ponder changing that to one of our three on whom the first night's unfortunate focus may have fallen.
Or are we doing the First To Reach n Votes rule? Hypothetically: Me and Appleheadguy each have two votes, but I hit two votes first...
Yes it's the FIFO method, first in, first out!
Another Tally
2 - Melrose : Appleguy123 (48), Ravenvii (50)
2 - Plutonius : mrkramer (45), Tomorrow (55)
2 - Appleguy123 : Moyank24 (47), Melrose (56)
1 - Twietee : Plutonius (44)
1 - Moyank24 : Rack Snagwell (51)
1 - Rick Snagwell : Twietee (52)
1 - Ravenvii : Scepticalscribe (53)
Yes, but I doubt that the the three unfortunates under the cosh will all remain on two votes each, so that will be moot, unless the person to be lynched is lynched on two votes which is highly unlikely.
Inevitably, some - if not all - will begin to gather votes - or, all three will gradually attract votes from those who have already voted for someone else.
Once one of the three of you reach three votes, that old tie has been rendered null and void.
First in, first out?
That means the first unfortunate to reach any tally - in the eventual event of a tie - becomes the person most likely to be lynched, I assume?
As of now, three people on two votes each, with @Melrose having reached that number before anyone else.
However, all that becomes null when the first person of of that trio reaches three votes..
Interesting - @appleguy123 has voted for @Melrose, who has, in turn, voted for @appleguy123.
For now, I am interested to see how @Plutonius - who is currently also on two votes - votes (at present, he has voted for @twietee, the first person to register any vote).
For now, I am interested to see how @Plutonius - who is currently also on two votes - votes (at present, he has voted for @twietee, the first person to register any vote).
You will understand that my vote was rather defensive. First-day voting always results in some poor sap being lynched prematurely.
Well, I assume that both your vote - and, to a certain extent, that of @appleguy123 - are defensive. That is a given. So, I am curious to see what our mutual friend the enigmatic and sometimes elusive @Plutonius does - or what he says.
As, obviously, I shall probably have to switch my vote, in order to make it count, I am curious to hear what others may have to say.
What's to say
. The first day vote is usually random. I don't want to vote Appleguy off since we finally got him to play. Likewise, I don't want to vote for Melrose so I'm not switching my vote to either of them.
What's to say
Ah, are you hoping that someone saves you or convicts you (howsoever so senselessly)?
Yes exactly,
it's at midnight GMT, in less than 3 hours.
What's to say
Ehm, you on some kind of suicide mission then?
Alright, Plutonius:
I accept that you may not wish to vote for @Melrose, or @appleguy123 for now. We haven't seen either of them for some time.
But why should I not vote for you?
I accept that you may not wish to vote for @Melrose, or @appleguy123 for now. We haven't seen either of them for some time.
But why should I not vote for you?
Thanks a lot for the welcome clarification.
Time to stir the pot, so, and see what the depths of the gumbo bring up.
I'm just not going to vote for either of them. I will however switch my vote to Tomorrow.
Experienced WW hunter and I never reveal my role (if any)
. Other than that, there is nothing to go on in day 1.