if Don't Panic think the hunter as something to do with that, I'm suspicious!
The logical assumption would be that the hunter got lucky and stopped the wolves. I'm not sure why you would vote for Don't Panic based on that, other than if you were a wolf and trying to get us to pile on a villager in revenge for your messed up kill. So based on that I have to vote for you Sythas unless you can give me a good reason not to.if Don't Panic think the hunter as something to do with that, I'm suspicious!
Why's that suspicious? It's the logical conclusion that the hunter protection preempeted the wolves.
The logical assumption would be that the hunter got lucky and stopped the wolves. I'm not sure why you would vote for Don't Panic based on that, other than if you were a wolf and trying to get us to pile on a villager in revenge for your messed up kill. So based on that I have to vote for you Sythas unless you can give me a good reason not to.
I just like to go against him and I was just trying to find a good excuse, it that a crime !?!?
beside, we could discuss the fact that the hunter protected a villager, which is a very good information and that I'm pretty sure the seer scanned one too, should those special give us that information ? 4/10 clean on the second day is a pretty good odd in our favor. it's just a sad case if the seer scanned the hunter and the hunter protected the seer.
You think it's a "no-kill" copycat? Interesting..
Only DP or Pluto would be fiendish enough to plot and carry out such a brilliant play. It may even take both masterbrains combined..
-
On a less serious note: I wouldn't out myself just yet - but easy to say as I'm just a boring villager, trying to find a wolf or two.
Where do you get that i'm saying it's a no-kill copycat?
I've actually done it myself in one of these games - but that was because I was the infected hunter and I was trying to establish credibility. But I don't see any reason to do it in a simple game like this.
it should beI just like to go against him and I was just trying to find a good excuse, it that a crime !?!?
beside, we could discuss the fact that the hunter protected a villager, which is a very good information and that I'm pretty sure the seer scanned one too, should those special give us that information ? 4/10 clean on the second day is a pretty good odd in our favor. it's just a sad case if the seer scanned the hunter and the hunter protected the seer.
and whoever was protected tonight is very likely dead tomorrow night, since it is a sure kill for the wolves.
unless of course a more pressing or juicier target emerges from our daily bickerings![]()
lol, early morning brain there! i updated all above.more like:
dont panic 1 /// sythas
sythas 1 /// mrkramer
What timezone are you in, rick?
it is also very possible that the hunter protected themselves.
and whoever was protected tonight is very likely dead tomorrow night, since it is a sure kill for the wolves.
unless of course a more pressing or juicier target emerges from our daily bickerings![]()
exactly. I was thinking whether that should be a reason to come forward or not, but I don't see a positive in that. It would only assure the wolfies that they got the hunter (in case s/he protected her- / himself). Other than that DP and Pluto are common targets for protection / dessert night one so that is a possibility as well - although I somewhat doubt that was the case here.
Going to go with Sythas right now, but I'm interested to see where the other votes fall.
Honestly, that justification for voting for Don't panic is incredibly weak and sounds like a desperate attempt to legitimatize yourself and form a bandwagon on a villager.it's not nice for a lady to bandwagon on a poor villager!
You think it's a "no-kill" copycat? Interesting..
Only DP or Pluto would be fiendish enough to plot and carry out such a brilliant play. It may even take both masterbrains combined.