Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
I’m curious of the apple crowd on here, who of you would pay this price?
I mean vision pro looks cool, I can imagine working with it and obviously watch a movie and gaming. For $2000 I would have not thought twice about but.. $3500 is just a lot.. for a toy..
who else had to laugh when they showed that guy film his kids with it? None will pull out these things at a kids birthday..way to creepy

The point they were making: This device enables busy parents to very easily multitask when they are working at home. That alone is worth the price tag to me. (Now convince my employer to switch from PCs to Macs and we'll be all set. ;))
 
Ah yes, the good old days of OS X names.
My favorite OS X Lion.

1686019371299.jpeg
 
The headset relies way too much on Siri. I’ve lived through too many years of that nonsense on phones and himepods to suddenly drop $3,500 for an early adopter toy that features siri front and center. Apple needs ti get AI right, quickly.
If they let you download Google Assistant it would work a lot better.
 
One thing that’s going a bit under the radar is Apple making a low key gaming play On MacOS. Apple Silicon has given them a real opening in the gaming market. I’ll be interested to see how it works out over the next couple of years.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Allen_Wentz
The headset relies way too much on Siri. I’ve lived through too many years of that nonsense on phones and himepods to suddenly drop $3,500 for an early adopter toy that features siri front and center. Apple needs ti get AI right, quickly.
What Siri was used for in the demo is what Siri is actually good for. Simple stuff. Siri breaks down rather quickly with any query that is not simple.
 
Not in its current state of design, hence why I mentioned in under a decades time. I think these type of devices will be the norm.
So if you want to have a private conversation, you'll need to buy separate earbuds.

How do you FaceTime with it so that others can see you?

If you want to use Apple Pay or anything having to do with the Wallet app, you'll need to buy an Apple Watch. Or do you just tap your forehead on payment terminal?

How do you take a group picture you want to be in? Take off and pass your Vision Pro to someone? What about taking a selfie? There's no flash for low light/night time pics so Apple will have to add that.

Want to give your wife/husband/significant other a kiss? You'll both have to take it off first otherwise the enclosures with smack into each other.

Try wearing this outside for several hours during the sweltering summer. I don't see how this will be comfortable for long periods. You think a construction worker is going to wear this while on the job? It's going to get in the way.

It will probably be illegal to use/wear while driving. So how do you use Maps for navigation?

Don't see an IP rating for this. Better not let it get wet like when it rains.

Sorry, but I just don't see this replacing the iPhone/cellphone.
 
Last edited:
I must say I am really impressed by Apple’s spacial computing push and the first iteration of Vision Pro. Hudge technological breakthrough and innovation to make this possible. This takes time before people understand this new category and user adoption will be a big challenge. I see new opportunities for work, communication, collaboration and entertainment.
Still waiting for the 27 inch M2 iMac, Tim….
 
WWDC23 was absolutely breath taking. :cool:
I can see the Vision Pro paving the way for folks all over wearing one of these instead of carrying an iPhone or cellphone in under a decades time for sure.
Are you being sarcastic?

Imagine wearing something that weighs as much as your iPhone for 8 hours. Just imagine that. You'd be lucky not to develop some kind of deformity after a few years, not to mention a decade. And this is all assuming battery technology will have advanced to the point where it's able to provide all-day power to some future iteration of Vision Pro.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Col4bin
Bluetooth accessories work with it out of the box.
I know it may seem that way, but not everyone has wireless/bluetooth earbuds. And those who really care about the environment have/use wired earbuds/headphones.

Did you watch the presentation? FaceTime presents a virtual persona based on a scan of your face.
A scan of your face isn't the same as a live shot.

I guess you've never gone on vacation and did a FaceTime chat with a family member or friend so they could see where you were at in the background. I guess you'll just have to send them a selfie. Oops. It can't do selfies either. 🤣
 
Last edited:
I’m curious of the apple crowd on here, who of you would pay this price?
I mean vision pro looks cool, I can imagine working with it and obviously watch a movie and gaming. For $2000 I would have not thought twice about but.. $3500 is just a lot.. for a toy.
Not a toy. This is the Pro version, as in MacBook Pro. Non-pro versions will no doubt be introduced at a lower price with commensurate features.
Edit: I'd buy it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Apple Fan 2008


Apple today held the WWDC 2023 keynote event that saw the introduction of the Apple Vision Pro headset, the 15-inch MacBook Air, new versions of the Mac Pro and Mac Studio, iOS 17, macOS Sonoma, watchOS 10, and more.


This was an insane event that was so fast-paced it was tough to keep up with everything that was being announced. iOS 17 and macOS Sonoma only starred in a few minutes of the keynote, so there were a lot of things that went under the radar. We've recapped everything that was announced in the video up above, and we've also rounded up all of our coverage of Apple's announcements to give you a complete overview of everything that's worth knowing about.

Apple Vision Pro

Mac Announcements

iOS 17 and iPadOS 17
... Click here to read rest of article

Article Link: WWDC 2023 Recap: Everything Apple Announced Today
The products introduced - in particular the new Mac Pro - suggest to me that the production of M3 chips was problematic in some way; too pricey, slow yield development, whatever. Because all along it has seemed to me that the higher transistor density of M3 would be necessary to build an appropriately advanced Mac Pro.

The M2 Mac Pro, un-leaked, unexciting, appears to just be a (not bad) fill-in until M3 chip production matures enough to allow the real new Mac Pro to show itself.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.