The magazine industry has done this for decades. If a magazine comes out in June, it is the July issue, because it will be on the shelves for much of July, until the August issue comes out in mid-to-late July... That always annoyed me as well, but it is the was the world works, unfortunately.TBH, I don't agree with this. Released in 2025, please refer it to '25. Easiest.
Yes, there are more months in 2026 for which these OS are the "most up-to-date" but, to me, it still feels like quite cheap marketing. "Let's use 26 instead of 25 as it is more".
I skipped Vista, but I do remember you could remove the glassy Aero effect in Windows 7, and end up with a straightforward and very stable system. 8 was focused on tablets, and was a bit of a mess because of it - it was trying to be like Windows phones (which were very good, btw), but it didn't work well on a larger screen. 10 rode back from that.XP was pretty solid though. it was vista and 7 that had the aero glass effect that got toned down with win8
i’m not quite sure of the value of using all these translucent windows and menus in macOS. Is this going to greatly improve the legibility and visibility of screen elements?
TBH, I don't agree with this. Released in 2025, please refer it to '25. Easiest.
Yes, there are more months in 2026 for which these OS are the "most up-to-date" but, to me, it still feels like quite cheap marketing. "Let's use 26 instead of 25 as it is more".
So has the games industry. FIFA '94 came out in 1993 and so it continues.The magazine industry has done this for decades. If a magazine comes out in June, it is the July issue, because it will be on the shelves for much of July, until the August issue comes out in mid-to-late July... That always annoyed me as well, but it is the was the world works, unfortunately.
It is the same as the 99c instead of a round dollar on prices, $9.99 is so much less than $10! Look, it is only 9, not 10!![]()
It should really be named the release year + 1, because that is when the working functionality will be delivered.Given the 20 years Apple called every release MacOS X, OS X or macOS 10.something. It is way closer to version 26 then 16 and the next major release should probably be macOS 30
Cook does not see any money in that. Instead he uses advertising bandaid over the issues and it seems to work. Especially for all of the fashion conscious Apple users.I'm hoping for a lot of under-the-hood stability improvements. A sort-of modern Snow Leopard if you will
Whoa, that is all Cook has for innovation. Cook won't get in the spotlight unless he does something revolutionary like this. Just think every media outlet will be like, "Please come and explain this revolutionary thinking by Apple."All in the last decade. Make up your mind Apple and stick to a coherent versioning system please...
- OS X 10.x ➡️ MacOS 10.x
- MacOS 10.x ➡️ MacOS x
- MacOS x ➡️ MacOS y
And the name leaked this early? No fun speculation this year...sad
Well, it's also when looking back in a few years on OS 26.Video games have done this for at least 30 years. That Madden game that's coming out in two months? Madden NFL 26, not 25.
At the end of the day, what does it matter in 3 years whether it's called iOS 21 or 29?
Apple has a decent amount of time to change it from Tahoe to something else. Which they should do…after all they’ve been known to plant false rumors.
If it brings cohesion to the system then good, but they walked back much of the window chrome translucency before because it didn’t work and users hated it. Translucency only works sparingly and in certain places. Trying to bring consistency by giving everything novel but distracting translucency is misguided. And yes, they did ruin System Settings on the Mac in the name of consistency, even though the Mac has plenty of screen space and a pointer cursor as its UX. Giving the old System Settings some better icons may have made some sense, replicating iOS? No.Why do they think they have to make Mac OS more like iOS?
The only reason iOS is the way it is is because of screen size.
They ruined System Preferences, now they want to do that to the whole experience?
They stuck with the current design language for 5 years!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!Stick with a design language for at least 3 years!!!
Yeah and because that transparent/translucent UI worked so well in Vista...This transparent effect, harkens to the days of Windows Vista my only time using a windows PC.
I wonder if Apple is bringing back the dashboard since dashboard cracking is an issue in the Tahoe.
View attachment 2515961
The problem is, Microsoft is giving you a new OS nearly every month, or at least adding features, removing features, renaming them and moving them around the interface at a whim, on a monthly cadence. The monthly security updates now include a lucky-dip feature change as well.
Copilot has moved places, changed size, had its keyboard shortcut changed multiple times over the last 12 months. Sometimes it is a bit lozenge on the taskbar, sometimes it is a little icon, sometimes it is next to the start menu, sometimes it is on the right, next to the status information, you need to press Win+C to call it up, then Alt+Space (rendering the window menu unreachable in an emergency, when the window isn't on the screen), now it is back to Win+C with the latest update.
I do think it would make more sense to change the iPhone names than the software names. I mean to the iPhones, iPads and Macs seem better aligned with annual naming. But I suppose that would date some things?I can’t take the stupid “26” naming scheme seriously at all, it feels like an elaborate inside joke
Please Apple don’t let this happen