There's no need for a new Mac OS or Windows or even Linux release every year. I wish we'd just slow things down.
There generally is no need except to drive new hardware sales
There's no need for a new Mac OS or Windows or even Linux release every year. I wish we'd just slow things down.
Or Linux. Last year's Linux Mint is supported until 2029. It runs fine on a 2012 Mac Mini. The limitation is if you need some specific commercial application not available on Linux.Just try Windows then. New OS every 5 years or so, UI rarely changes, pretty stable system, frequent automatic updates, very versatile, access to all third-party software, and excellent backward compatibility.
I mean, Samsung did this same thing with their phones back in 2020 and haven't looked back sinceI can’t take the stupid “26” naming scheme seriously at all, it feels like an elaborate inside joke
Please Apple don’t let this happen
Samsung also did it from 10 to 20 and only on a single hardware line, which is a lot easier of a transition than several assorted numbers for OSes all sent straight to “26”I mean, Samsung did this same thing with their phones back in 2020 and haven't looked back since
In the end, it's just a number and even as someone who is techy, I couldn't care less that they're skipping over 19 and going to 26
I think you have to realize that of the millions of different people who use these things, only a very small portion even care enough to know what version of iOS they are on. For the average, every day user it just doesn't register for them.
For a moment I read that as Mac OS Taco.
Trouble is macs are the only current models on sale, whereas they'll keep selling iPhones a year or 2 old along with the new ones, so not quite the same. Don't think someone in 2026 wants to think they're buying a 2024 iPhone. But buying an iPhone 16 in 2026 doesn't sound as bad.Apple doesn't use numbers for each new generation of Macs or iPads. Maybe this will be the year when they drop the number from the iPhone name, and deprecate it to a secondary position? Instead of iPhone 26, it would become iPhone (mid-2025), iPhone Pro (mid-2025), and so on, running a numbered version of iOS tied to the release year?
I think you just supported their plan to drive upgrades for the latest models.Trouble is macs are the only current models on sale, whereas they'll keep selling iPhones a year or 2 old along with the new ones, so not quite the same. Don't think someone in 2026 wants to think they're buying a 2024 iPhone. But buying an iPhone 16 in 2026 doesn't sound as bad.
The massive ui redesign?how is it a big release ? i dont see anything big here
Well more than 10 years ago..windows 95 98 Me( millennium) 2000 then came XpDidn’t Windows do that 10 years ago…named everything by the year? How’d that work out for them?
Stay in one lane, fix the bugs quicker and leave it be for a few years once it works. This constant change, with new bugs that will take months to fix if they are ever fixed, is tiring.
hoping they might kill rosetta 2 with this release
Meh, I have always liked transparency in a desktop UI. Maybe I'm just a simpleton, but Win7/Vista aero glass was cool, heck even all the way back in the day messing around with Enlightenment on Linux. It's an aesthetic, but it's one that I like... as opposed to the page flipping crap.Transparency is bull**** for user interfaces. A user interface should be nice and not obtrusive, ist shouldn't distract users from their work. We had this with skeuomorphic design when the user was forced to watch a page flipping animation when all he wanted to do is to move to the next page.
That wouldn’t surprise me at all. The amount of separation between people like us, who visit forums/websites like these, and the average user is pretty vast.I'd hazard a guess that 90% of my friends and family with iPhones/iPads have never once updated iOS/iPadOS after purchase
dont get your hopes upI'm hoping for a lot of under-the-hood stability improvements. A sort-of modern Snow Leopard if you will