Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
yadmonkey said:
I'm looking forward to when a third-party can test the new displays and prove/disprove their impressive specs. Response time can make or break the deal for me.

I agree if apple's specs are incorrect or false it will put a major damper on the quality of these displays...
 
This monitor DOES NOT compare to any of the Apple display's except the old models. Wow 700:1 contrast ratio, nice one.. except it will be utilized by almost no one. Now look at the pixle pitch, much lower than apple's displays, this means not as clear of a picture, in other words less pixles per inch.

Second, let me look at the response time, 25ms compared to Apple's 16. Now you lose out on the fire wire hub, and the nice enclosure.
DaveG5:
I think you have pixel pitch (.dot pitch) confused with dot per inch. the lower the dot pitch the better and the higher the DPI (dots per inch the better) in most cases all things being equal.
Also be advised that when independently reviewed, specs like contrast, brightness (which is always turned down when you get the LCD), response time, viewing angles, etc are usually less than flattering (listed,) as all manufactures use the best numbers they can get away with in their advertising, and there are many variables depending on what resolution it was tested at, and sometime from different units of the same display model #.
For instance certain specs like response time, benchmark faster at non native resolutions, or so I have been told. and then there is dead or stuck pixels, as even to this day LCD Makers cant guarantee you wont get some. :)
 
Since introduction or so, The Apple 23" has been the best value LCD in it's price category, even if you need an adc to dvi adapter.
The 20" was very competitive at launch, but no has quite a lot of lower price competition, the 17" has always been over priced except at launch. the 30" has no competition at its size. however for like $7000 you can get the 22.2" IBM viewsonic 3800X2400 and card, but that is not really for general computing.
2 out of 3 aint bad.



stuBCN75 said:
Has anyone found a non Apple 23" widescreen display ?

something that can match the Apple specs point by point, ports etc. and better on price ?

honestly, i will not buy from Apple if i can find an alternative. I just want a good display, ideally 23" widescreen ( because why not ).

anyone ?

i have looked around but can find nothing to match it yet. of course i can find similar displays but nothing which widescreen and has all the ports and is cheaper.
 
studiopix said:
You'll have to forgive Groovebuster if he doesn't get back to you right away Euthyphro, cause they're aren't any 20" widescreen displays for the PC. If he does find one (definitely not 10 or more) from some obsure company off in the far east somewhere, I'll be curious to know what the price is. What remains as fact is that Apple introduced widescreen displays long ago with a 20" size that no other company has bothered to offer. And up until recently, Apple offered a 23" widescreen display that was hundereds less than any offering from any other PC manufacturer. The Sony 23" widescreen that retails for around $2500 is just crap, (low contrast, washed out colors, slow pixel response time) especialy compared to Sony's newer 17" LCDs.

I personally bought the HP L2335 for my PC but I'll be sure to grab a new Cinema Display when I upgrade my G4 to a G5.

My blog.

I like the Lacie 20" at $1299 also, I think it is Apple's closet competitor form a quality company. It is not wide screen, rather long screen 1600X1200. with pivoting for mac if you have a Ati9800, and optional color calibrator and articulating arm. no firewire or usb ports, just usb.
this would be a tough choice.
Does anyone know what are the exact specs for HD. there seems to be many
420p-720i,p-1080i-1080p-1200.
I am confused on that?
 
MrSugar said:
For your information I run dual Viewsonic 17" VP171b monitors. I know all of which you speak of, I do my own research and buy what I think is the best deal. But I also know that Apple's displays are among the best out there.

To answer your question YES, I have looked at the other competition out there. Here is your 173p monitor specs:

Specifications

* Model: 173P-Silver
* Panel Type: a-si TFT/PVA
* Size: 17"
* Pixel Pitch (mm): 0.264
* Brightness: 270 cd/m2
* Contrast Ratio: 700:1
* Viewing Angle (H/V): 178/178
* Response Time (ms): 25
* Aspect Ratio: 4:3
* Interface: Analog/Digital
* Frequency Horiz Rate (kHz): 30-81 (Analog), 30-63 (Digital)
* Vert. Rate (Hz): 56-76
* Bandwidth (Mhz): 140
* Resolution: Maximum 1280x1024, Native: 1280x1024
* Colors Supported: 16.7 Million
* Signal Input: Input Video Signal; Analog RGB, DVI Digital Link
* Video Level: Analog : 0.7VP-P; Digital: TMDSTM
* Sync Type: Separate H/V, Composite H/V, SOG
* Input Connectors: 15pin D-Sub, DVI-D
* Plug and Play: DDC 2B
* Power On/Working (Watts): 40
* Wall Mount: VESA® 75mm (optional)

This monitor DOES NOT compare to any of the Apple display's except the old models. Wow 700:1 contrast ratio, nice one.. except it will be utilized by almost no one. Now look at the pixle pitch, much lower than apple's displays, this means not as clear of a picture, in other words less pixles per inch.

Second, let me look at the response time, 25ms compared to Apple's 16. Now you lose out on the fire wire hub, and the nice enclosure.

It's clear you really aren't providing me with any of the information which you talk so highly about. You make claims without links or background to support them. I have proved my point from various sides now, doing the research to find the exact specs which you did not. The Apple monitors are clearly better, if you find your cheaper displays, with worse pixle pitch, and slower response time to look and work better than an Apple display that is fine by me... just know that your claims are out of place.


that being said I have yet to see the "new" apple displays, but just from people that have, they sound amazing. Hard for me to think that Apple wouldn't put out one of the best displays on the market, esspecially after such a long wait...

yawn! - an infitessinal pixel pitch difference, half the contrast which many people would of course make use of (I am talking about those of us that need colour critical etc, not gamers) and a response time that on these babies makes little difference...

You seem to be personally offended, and even when quoting the figures, you don't gain any ground! - as I said, put em side by side and look at the price tag and tell me whether they are 'worth' the difference.

no more to say! ;)
 
daveg5 said:
...and then there is dead or stuck pixels, as even to this day LCD Makers cant guarantee you wont get some. :)
Exactly why I'm waiting for Best Buy to start selling the new 23" Cinema's before I purchase. 14 days no questions asked return policy on monitors. I can order on the web and return to the store if I end up with a green pixel stairing at me from my new $2600 investment (including nVidia card).

I'm seriously considering buying the extended warranty as well in case stuck pixels show up after 14 days...
 
Cooknn said:
Exactly why I'm waiting for Best Buy to start selling the new 23" Cinema's before I purchase. 14 days no questions asked return policy on monitors. I can order on the web and return to the store if I end up with a green pixel stairing at me from my new $2600 investment (including nVidia card).

I'm seriously considering buying the extended warranty as well in case stuck pixels show up after 14 days...

Not sure what is happening with Apple computers at the Best Buy Stores. In the Northern Virginia area it appears that they are out of the computer end of Apple now.
 
Chip NoVaMac said:
Not sure what is happening with Apple computers at the Best Buy Stores. In the Northern Virginia area it appears that they are out of the computer end of Apple now.
Yeah, I guess it didn't work out at the store end, but they are still selling Apple products on-line at bestbuy.com. I'm hoping that they pick up the new displays. Good news for me is that they are building a CompUSA in my town. I'm really hoping they do the Apple "store within a store". That would ROCK. The closest Apple store to me (Fort Myers) is over 2 hours away.
 
re: groovebuster

I don't want to get anywhere in the middle of anything..But doesn't Apple pay LG to make LCD's according to its own specifications...Its a similar business model to the car industry where for example one company is payed to build a engine to specific requirements for another manufacturers vehicle.

You can't buy it anywhere else because Apple has muzzled the manufacturer from selling it on the side and undercutting its own sales...

Of course you pay a premium for the brandname...A BMW is not necessarily a better car than say for example a Ford...It may be - but its not 100k better...a large element of the extra cash is for the brand name and its elitist tag. Same with Apple, same with Nike, Reebok and a thousand other fashion labels. Theres one thing that makes people come back to a brand and thats the fact that they may think they are buying something a little better, a little different, a little more ritzy for a small outlay in extra cash.
 
IIc said:
...Of course you pay a premium for the brandname... Theres one thing that makes people come back to a brand and thats the fact that they may think they are buying something a little better, a little different, a little more ritzy for a small outlay in extra cash.

Exactly - Better by association, not by facts.
 
groovebuster said:
A normal 20" LCD offers more Real Estate...

20" Widescreen -> 1,764,000 Pixels

20" "normal" 4:3 -> 1,920,000 Pixels

... and the normal 4:3 LCD costs less as well.

I don't see any other reason as "looks" for the 20" Apple Cinema Dislplay...

groovebuster

By "normal", I assume you mean standard. As in old standard. Also, yes, a 4:3 old standard display which requires less materials than a 16:9 widescreen will always cost less. Funny how that works.:rolleyes:

"Normal" is quickly becoming 16:9 widescreen for both the television and computer display industries.
 
Cooknn said:
Exactly why I'm waiting for Best Buy to start selling the new 23" Cinema's before I purchase. 14 days no questions asked return policy on monitors. I can order on the web and return to the store if I end up with a green pixel staring at me from my new $2600 investment (including nVidia card).

I'm seriously considering buying the extended warranty as well in case stuck pixels show up after 14 days...

Just be sure that you purchase the display and G5 at the same time. If purchased separately, then you can't get AppleCare. That is what happened to me with my 17", which was purchased out of necessity, only have a one year warranty.
 
wdlove said:
Just be sure that you purchase the display and G5 at the same time. If purchased separately, then you can't get AppleCare. That is what happened to me with my 17", which was purchased out of necessity, only have a one year warranty.
thats bad, most lcds are starting to give you a 3 year warranty like Apple should, can you imagine $1299 20"-$1999 23"-$4000 30" and video card and only 1 year warranty.
the video card seperately would have a 3 year warranty if it were available at retail.
 
BenQ FP231W 23"

Here's another widescreen 23" display. This one is the FP231W From BenQ . The best price I could find was US$2700. Makes the new 23" Apple Cinema look a little better eh? I would say this comparison is almost "apples to apple(s)" :D

Measurement: 23"
Panel Size: 20" x 12"
Dimensions: (HxWxD)21.1" x 18.3" x 9.8"
Native Pixel Resolution: 1920x1200
Supported TV Resolutions: 720p; 1080i and 1080p via VGA or DVI
Aspect Ratio: 16:10
Panel Response Time: 16ms (can run at about 60fps)
Viewing Angles (Vert & Horiz): 176°
Inputs: D-Sub (VGA); DVI; S-Video Composite
TV Tuner: None
Audio System: Optional; two-channels; 4W/channel
Remote Control: None
USB Hub: Four-port
 
daveg5 said:
thats bad, most lcds are starting to give you a 3 year warranty like Apple should, can you imagine $1299 20"-$1999 23"-$4000 30" and video card and only 1 year warranty.
the video card separately would have a 3 year warranty if it were available at retail.

You can't really blame Apple, they want us to buy a CPU also. They make more money that way. If you want the 30" then the G5 and Nivida are required. Certainly a good way to encourage sales if the desire is there.
 
daveg5 said:
Since introduction or so, The Apple 23" has been the best value LCD in it's price category, even if you need an adc to dvi adapter.
The 20" was very competitive at launch, but no has quite a lot of lower price competition, the 17" has always been over priced except at launch. the 30" has no competition at its size. however for like $7000 you can get the 22.2" IBM viewsonic 3800X2400 and card, but that is not really for general computing.
2 out of 3 aint bad.

I agree, completely.

I do love Apple products, and i have just ordered a G52.5 + 23" Apple display :)

I just wanted to see if there was any alternative, i could of done with saving a few €'s to get the RAM to a decent spec.

( my only real gripe with Apple is the that you always have to buy a few extras !. 512MB RAM is just too low for their high end Macs. Airport ready ? If you spend more an Airport Card, likewise with BlueTooth )

Ah well, can't have everything we want in life ! I will be a happy man when i get my new G5, even if i do have to spend a bit more cash to get the specs i want )

Oh, i still have not seen a single monitor which can match the Apple 23". not one !
Any one else ?
 
Well, there is the SONY SDM-P232W/B 23" which some people claim uses the same panel as the 'old' Apple 23".

It can be purchases refurbished for ~$1800. But you can buy the old Apple 23" for $1800 new now.

(Note: Having said this, I am buying the new Apple 23")
 
If you don't like the prices for the cinema displays, don't buy them. Stop bitching, and let Apple make the business decisions. They do more than just sit on their ass all day and complain.
 
I don't see anyone 'bitching' on this thread...

If you read my post, it states that the Apple price is better than the Sony price.
 
new 20" cinemas finally shipping

can't wait. check your apple order, yours should be shipping now too! ;)
 
Euthyphro said:
can't wait. check your apple order, yours should be shipping now too! ;)

Yes, it's great news that according to apple.com the new aluminum 20" & 23" Cinema Display began shipping today. Many happy customers will now feel fulfilled.
 
23" is HUGE (Don't be fooled by pic's with the 30")

I visited my first Apple Store this week :p My boys and I were at Newport Beach on vacation and made the journey to the Costa Mesa store. Very Cool! First thing I noticed was that even though the 23" Cinema looks small compared to the 30", it is still LARGE. They only had the old models on display but it was enough to convince me to go ahead with my purchase of the new 23".

While we were there my son bought an iTrip & Car Charger for his iPod since we were doing some driving. I picked up a book on FCE 2. Went from Newport to Big Bear then on to Vegas and saw the Grand Canyon/Hoover Dam. Thanks to his iPod and iTrip - we were jammin the entire way :D
 
HP 23" LCD $1599, no firewire, more features!

Is this monitor the first 23" monitor equal or better than Apple's for $500 less?
http://www.macgamer.com/features/?id=1886

That's a nice monitor and I was considering it while waiting for Apple's Cinema upgrade. I think it's more like $1700. Where did you see $1499?

That's a nice monitor and I was considering it while waiting for Apple's Cinema upgrade. I think it's more like $1700. Where did you see $1499?


It's $1599 on HP site, that's with a 3 year warranty i heard it can be had for $1499 if you look around, it does not have firewire, but has 4 USB ports, PIP,Svideo component video, VGa and I think 2 DVI's, 3 year warranty, exact same specs as Apple, plus Height Adjustment, It looks like the best 23" value out, I could hook up the Xbox, cable Dvd, HDTV and everything to it, straight from the factory. I dont understand why it is so cheap, relatively speaking, I would just put an Apple logo on and smile, what are the downsides, Did Apple let HP do these in exchange for HP doing the Ipods? you may need IE to view the 3d demo
http://h71016.www7.hp.com/html/inte...2335/model.htm
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.