Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
bkopi said:
I wonder now, how on earth can any video card based on that GPU drive the new 30" display at a resolution of 2560x1600?! And why this display is only supposed to be good for MACs? The GeForce 6800 is available for PCs also!

If anybody has any info on that I would appreciate a response, as I'm trying to find out if there is any kind of scaling going on there (which would mean low graphics quality) or even worst, if this is all marketing crap?!

It's real pixels, not scaled--and good question!

I think the answer has to be that the PC GeForce 6800 is NOT quite as high-end as this Mac-only "6800 Ultra DDL"--which can handle more pixels and will probably come to PCs too in the end.
 
Not $599

you ONLY have to pay $135 if upgrading from 9800XT!!!!!!

Best deal on planet!


carletonmusic said:
Impressive - it's just a shame that on top of $3299, you have to pay $599 for the video card to drive it. 🙁
 
two 30" lcd ... 6598
graphics card ... 599
PowerMac G5 ... 1999 - 2999
8 million pixels and making a mess in your pants ... priceless
 
Stella said:
Your imagination is running wild... 🙂

The 30" display will work fine on a PC.

No, Steve said it's Mac-only. The 20" and 23" are for PC.

The reason is that the required NVIDIA card is Mac-only--BUT I do expect that to change. I expect 30" on PC will become possible.
 
Tiger running on a G3

The best thing about the screenshots (not the ginormous fancy-pants monitors) is that the About This Mac window shows Tiger running on a 900-Mhz G3! Let's hope Tiger maintains G3 support up to its release!
 
bkopi said:
According to nVidia's specifications the GeForce 6800 GPU can deliver a resolution of up to 2048x1536. The specs are on their web site at http://www.nvidia.com/page/pg_20040406661996.html

I wonder now, how on earth can any video card based on that GPU drive the new 30" display at a resolution of 2560x1600?! And why this display is only supposed to be good for MACs? The GeForce 6800 is available for PCs also!

If anybody has any info on that I would appreciate a response, as I'm trying to find out if there is any kind of scaling going on there (which would mean low graphics quality) or even worst, if this is all marketing crap?!

In principal the GPU should be able to drive (2048x1536)x2, given the two DVI outputs. So another explanation could be that there is a special driver (probably for MAC OS, that's why the 30" display only for MACs) that 'steels' pixels from one DVI and drives them to the other.. producing some kind of (2560x1600) on one DVI and the remaining (1536x1472) on the second? Don't know, just speculating.. And anyway, Apple never claimed that a dual 30" display configuration can be driven at maximum resolution at the same time by a G5 with a GeForce 6800..

Any links to relevant tech discussions are highly appreciated

According Apple the 30inch displays can be used on Mac..but could mean a PC ver. is just down the road.

I just noticed this:

Apples 6800 is abit longer then the 6800's for the PC. Maybe it's been tweaked.

Apples: GeForce 6800 Ultra DDL graphics card:
m9593ga_125.jpg


PC version of the GeForce 6800 Ultra: (why no DDL in the name?)
verto-board.jpg
 
The DDL

referes to the Double DVI linking
this is the first board to feature that .. PC or mac
and the 30" needs it
 
LOL -
I wonder how many of these 30" displays Apple will actually sell.. they have a very limited market at the moment -
- Mac only
- G5 only
- Expensive graphics card ( and only one choice )
- $$$$ to spare

They won't be selling them to the average Mac user, that is for sure!

I could imagine Pixar will buy some since they are migrating to Macs...

nagromme said:
No, Steve said it's Mac-only. The 20" and 23" are for PC.

The reason is that the required NVIDIA card is Mac-only--BUT I do expect that to change. I expect 30" on PC will become possible.
 
6800

bkopi said:
According to nVidia's specifications the GeForce 6800 GPU can deliver a resolution of up to 2048x1536. The specs are on their web site at http://www.nvidia.com/page/pg_20040406661996.html

I wonder now, how on earth can any video card based on that GPU drive the new 30" display at a resolution of 2560x1600?! And why this display is only supposed to be good for MACs? The GeForce 6800 is available for PCs also!

If anybody has any info on that I would appreciate a response, as I'm trying to find out if there is any kind of scaling going on there (which would mean low graphics quality) or even worst, if this is all marketing crap?!

In principal the GPU should be able to drive (2048x1536)x2, given the two DVI outputs. So another explanation could be that there is a special driver (probably for MAC OS, that's why the 30" display only for MACs) that 'steels' pixels from one DVI and drives them to the other.. producing some kind of (2560x1600) on one DVI and the remaining (1536x1472) on the second? Don't know, just speculating.. And anyway, Apple never claimed that a dual 30" display configuration can be driven at maximum resolution at the same time by a G5 with a GeForce 6800..

Any links to relevant tech discussions are highly appreciated

There are several things here that are incorrect. First of all this card is NOT a stock 6800. It is a special card that uses DVI connectors that have two parallel DVI signals in each connector. Thus two 30" monitors per card. The stock card allows for one DVI signal per connector.

The specs that NVIDIA are quoting are the specs for a CRT, not an LCD. Specs of LCD's are very different from the analog output to a crt.

The second point is that Apple has stated that a Pc with a card that has the same functionality can drive this monitor. Steve is finally regarding Pc owners as his customers.

Try this link:

http://store.apple.com/1-800-MY-APPLE/WebObjects/AppleStore?productLearnMore=M9593G/A

This is from Apple's PDF, it explains a little about the DVI spec:

The DVI standard specifies a single connector that handles two different digital signal bandwidths: single link and dual link. At 165MHz, the single-link bandwidth supports HDTV and UXGA (1600-by-1200-pixel resolution) display formats. The dual-link bandwidth (transmitted over a single cable) uses the same DVI connection, but it supports much higher resolutions, such as the 2560-by-1600-pixel resolution of the 30-inch Apple Cinema HD Display.

In other words, DVI SL supports 1920x1200 at 60Hz or 1600x1200 at 60Hz.

DVI DL has double the bandwidth and supports a combination of rez and refresh that would use that bandwidth. Hence 2560x1600 at 60Hz. The confusion arises from the fact that with an LCD the rez and refresh rate is limited by the DVI bandwidth. If the card can deliver more, it doesn't matter because the DVI limits the output. DVI SL was designed for HDTV 1080p.

It's "G5 only" on the Mac, because those are the only machines that have an 8x AGP port. Some G5's don't have that either, such as the 1.6GHz and the new dual 1.8Hz. If a Pc has an 8x AGP slot, and a dual link card is available, then this monitor will work.

I hope that clears things up.
 
nagromme said:
It's real pixels, not scaled--and good question!

I think the answer has to be that the PC GeForce 6800 is NOT quite as high-end as this Mac-only "6800 Ultra DDL"--which can handle more pixels and will probably come to PCs too in the end.

the real solution (found if you watched the webcast) is that, its not scaled, or borrowing pixels, its done by using one dvi port to draw the top half of the screen, and the second to drive the second half of the screen. totalling a res of quite high. it does not work on PC's but the 20inch and 23inchers do...

aethier
 
aethier said:
the real solution (found if you watched the webcast) is that, its not scaled, or borrowing pixels, its done by using one dvi port to draw the top half of the screen, and the second to drive the second half of the screen. totalling a res of quite high. it does not work on PC's but the 20inch and 23inchers do...

aethier

You are almost correct. Please read my post above.
 
aethier said:
the real solution (found if you watched the webcast) is that, its not scaled, or borrowing pixels, its done by using one dvi port to draw the top half of the screen, and the second to drive the second half of the screen. totalling a res of quite high. it does not work on PC's but the 20inch and 23inchers do...

aethier

Yeah, melgross got it right. It only has one connector, but it runs at double speed.

BEN
 
Wow that 30"er is impressive it manages to even make the G5 case look small, the keyboard is so out of proportion (in terms of what we are used to) compared to the dual 30" setup.

Additionally that graphics card is massive it looks like its filling up almost the entire PCI segment of the G5 case, we sure won't be seeing the dual graphics card setup of alienware and nvidia without some physical changes to the case. I wonder if the card is so big because it still draws power from the agp pro slot which used to go to the adc connenctor, and hence the voltage has to be lowered.

I'm starting to like the look of these displays more and more, I just hate that head on angle Apple has on its website.

EDIT: just looked again at the pictures of the apple and pc 6800 and apple is definitely drawing power from the agp pro bit. A much neater solution all round, than the dual extra connectors on the PC version if you ask me.
 
Freg3000 said:
iSync is gone??? What? 😱

btw I can't see any of the jonshier stuff.

Edit: Links removed due to traffic? Wow that didn't last long. Anyone swiped the images so we an put up a mirror?

iSync the last of the free programs from Apple. Seems like everything is a paid upgrade. iLife, Safari, iChat, etc...
 
adamfilip said:
is there any standard in the pipeline that can support a really high res display

like a DVi-X (extreme ) so that you can plug one of these 30" beasties
with just one plug

if not they better make one soon. some thing that can support 10,000 x10000 pixels

This card uses a new DVI standard that allows for this...
 
There are already many Dual-Link cards for PCs that should work for this 30in. Just that they're all > $600, i think.

However, the problem is that this 30in is single-input, and I believe that there is no DL switch on the market (well, maybe someone will make one and charge $1000... )
So at least in the near future, we can't share this $$$$ monitor between a PC and a Mac....
 
adamfilip said:
The DDL

referes to the Double DVI linking
this is the first board to feature that .. PC or mac
and the 30" needs it

nVidia's QuadroFX line has Dual DVI Linking, and should be able to power the 30".

"dual DVI digital connectors drive the highest resolution digital displays available on the market. Dual-link DVI connector drives QUXGA-wide displays via a single connector."
"up to 2048x1536 per display or 3840x2400 for a single digital display"

So I suppose you couldn't get two 30" to work on a Quadro. Possibly.

Now I just need a capable KVM switch so both my mac and pc can use it!
 
bitfactory said:
yeah, but how does it RUN in this current build? and on what equipment? does it run most 3rd party apps?

does the finder seem faster? is it cocoa? come on ppl, how about the important stuff?!

Yes, please.
And: Whats with the "Services"-menu? Can I take screenshots from the finder? Anyone tried to run a java-app? Is that faster? How much can you modify the apperarance of the OS?
 
BornAgainMac said:
iSync the last of the free programs from Apple. Seems like everything is a paid upgrade. iLife, Safari, iChat, etc...

iSync isn't needed: synching functionality is system-wide, available to developers, and built into the OS. Apple isn't taking something away from us.

And I never paid for Safari or iChat, they came free with Panther 🙂
 
link

Arael said:
There are already many Dual-Link cards for PCs that should work for this 30in. Just that they're all > $600, i think.

However, the problem is that this 30in is single-input, and I believe that there is no DL switch on the market (well, maybe someone will make one and charge $1000... )
So at least in the near future, we can't share this $$$$ monitor between a PC and a Mac....

All dual link signals are coming from one connector, not two. The older IBM monitor had to use two cards because there were no dual link cards out at the time. Even if there were, they wouldn't have had the bandwidth to be of use. Only the last generation, and the new one have that kind of bandwidth.

Apple has two dual link connectors, therefore connecting two 30" monitors.
 
KVM

3G4N said:
nVidia's QuadroFX line has Dual DVI Linking, and should be able to power the 30".

"dual DVI digital connectors drive the highest resolution digital displays available on the market. Dual-link DVI connector drives QUXGA-wide displays via a single connector."
"up to 2048x1536 per display or 3840x2400 for a single digital display"

So I suppose you couldn't get two 30" to work on a Quadro. Possibly.

Now I just need a capable KVM switch so both my mac and pc can use it!

It's sad, but no KVM will handle that kind of bandwidth. When one comes out that will, it will cost almost as much as the monitor.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.