Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

MacRumors

macrumors bot
Original poster
Apr 12, 2001
68,670
39,576


Elon Musk's artificial intelligence company xAI on Tuesday announced Grok-3, and Musk is making some bold claims. The new AI model is said to have more than ten times the computing power of its predecessor and outperforms leading competitors, including OpenAI's GPT-4o and Google's Gemini.

grok-ai-logo.jpg

The latest iteration of xAI's flagship model introduces new "reasoning" capabilities through two distinct modes: "Think," which displays the AI's reasoning process while resolving requests, and "Big Brain" for handling more computationally intensive tasks.

Alongside the model update, xAI announced Deep Search, which the company describes as a "next generation search engine." The new feature is designed to analyze information from the internet and X (Twitter) to provide comprehensive answers to user queries.

Grok-3 will be available to X Premium Plus subscribers, which now costs $40 per month, up from $22 – the second such price hike in as many months. The company is also launching a new subscription tier called SuperGrok, priced at $30 per month, offering "the most advanced capabilities and earliest access to new features."

Musk said that Grok-3 is designed to be a "maximally truth-seeking AI," even when such truth might conflict with political correctness. The model has faced previous criticism for spreading election misinformation and having fewer restrictions on text-to-image generation.

Grok-3's reasoning capabilities are available in the Grok app. In the future, xAI says it plans to add synthesized voice capabilities to the Grok chatbot and intends to make the previous version, Grok-2, open source in the coming months.

Article Link: xAI Launches Grok-3 AI Model, Claims Superior Performance Over GPT-4
 
Why can’t differentiating between the three modes (think, big brain, deep search) be handled by another reasoning layer to properly identify the user’s needs, or just by tweaking certain word in the prompt like everything else is? Makes it feel less “smart” when we have to select a certain mode, especially from the guy who says “all input is error”.
 
Competition is good, but I'll take everything Musk declares with a grain of salt.

I need proof that it is vastly superior, and I'll believe it. If it's so much better than anything OpenAI does, why the hell did he want to buy them last week? 🙄

As for the "maximally truthful" selling point, with all the declarations he made on X so far this year, I just don't believe it one minute.
 
Competition is good, but I'll take everything Musk declares with a grain of salt.

I need proof that it is vastly superior, and I'll believe it. If it's so much better than anything OpenAI does, why the hell did he want to buy them last week? 🙄

As for the "maximally truthful" selling point, with all the declarations he made on X so far this year, I just don't believe it one minute.
OpenAI is trying to separate its for-profit and non-profit divisions, while Elon Musk is inflating its valuation to make things more difficult for them.
 
Elon Musk strikes again... Competition is good!
Why do we continue to give credit to this guy? If you want to celebrate the team fine, but let's not pretend this dude is in there coding and developing the LLM. He's not designing rockets or building batteries or electric motors. He's a money guy who spews a bunch of vaporware promises to pump his value in the company.

We don't give Warren Buffet direct credit when all the companies he's invested in go up in value. Why are we giving this carnival barker so much credit?
 
Why do we continue to give credit to this guy? If you want to celebrate the team fine, but let's not pretend this dude is in there coding and developing the LLM. He's not designing rockets or building batteries or electric motors. He's a money guy who spews a bunch of vaporware promises to pump his value in the company.

We don't give Warren Buffet direct credit when all the companies he's invested in go up in value. Why are we giving this carnival barker so much credit?
The same reason most fanboys on here give Tim credit. We don’t actually believe Tim is coming up with all the ideas for new products and services himself.
 
Why can’t differentiating between the three modes (think, big brain, deep search) be handled by another reasoning layer to properly identify the user’s needs, or just by tweaking certain word in the prompt like everything else is? Makes it feel less “smart” when we have to select a certain mode, especially from the guy who says “all input is error”.
Well this is what OpenAI is working on with their next releases. However, the concern is that we will all get dumped into this "smart" model that picks for us, and then you have to pay more money for higher intelligent versions, which actually diminishes the product further. Paying for intelligence shouldn't be thing. Intelligence is a universal trait, and everyone should have equal access to it. There should be no tiered system of intelligence.
 
Why do we continue to give credit to this guy? If you want to celebrate the team fine, but let's not pretend this dude is in there coding and developing the LLM. He's not designing rockets or building batteries or electric motors. He's a money guy who spews a bunch of vaporware promises to pump his value in the company.

We don't give Warren Buffet direct credit when all the companies he's invested in go up in value. Why are we giving this carnival barker so much credit?
Let's all be real honest. 7 years ago 75% of the readers on this site thought Elon Musk walked on water. It's not the technology or products that have changed minds.
 
The same reason most fanboys on here give Tim credit. We don’t actually believe Tim is coming up with all the ideas for new products and services himself.

Yeah but I think we clearly know that Cook doesn't come up with any product designs or ideas and that Apple is a massive team. Where as the internet seems to think Tesla IS Elon.

Cook deserves credit for steering a huge ship as a successful CEO. That's what he is, a good manager. Not a visionary or a creative. But he doesn't pay some kids to play a game 23 hours a day and claim it's him that's 7th in the world either.

At this point i'm not sure how much involvement Musk has with any of the companies - I doubt he's been at Tesla for months. He appears to be full time into this government thing - whatever it is. He's on Twitter for HOURS a day, i'm running one small business and I don't have time to do that, he's the CEO of what 3, four businesses?
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.