Do we seriously really need this. Seems like it can cause more issues than it actually solves.
Probably needs 1000 or 2000 Watts to work 🤣
Or they can come up with an option that scans your body and pinpoints some cancer. Then the charger's beam-forming tech can zap the cancer all day while you are working.Hello cancer forming technology.
By default, it comes with both options.Bring it on!!!...but don't give me cancer pls.
I will worry about healthy when my iPhone battery starts dying.This can‘t be healthy.
nothing mentioned in the linked article, but I would be VERY impressed if it were 50% ... article does state that range is several meters (whatever that number might be, 3? 4?) and that obstacles have no influence on efficiency ...Anyone have any efficiency data on these technologies? Love the convenience but I suspect it's very lossy.
I suppose the term "cable-less charging" better describes Qi charging a smartphone.
nothing mentioned in the linked article, but I would be VERY impressed if it were 50% ... article does state that range is several meters (whatever that number might be, 3? 4?) and that obstacles have no influence on efficiency ...
yep, and all that energy will be in the air ... thanks for the link![]()
Inverse-square law - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.org
It will be very wasteful, even if it is using something like beam-forming.