I'd even say those 2015 MBA photos are better than the 2018 MBP photos.
Not true these days....
The main light source is a florescent light behind the subject and the secondary light source is your screen. Did you think this was going to produce a quality shot?
A trillion dollar company lol well at least they used to be. Can't wait to see the Apple apologist put a positive spin on this one...
I think i will choose choice B. And also, all their friends they recommend computers to are Larry Ellisons."We don't care being the first but being the best", remember that speech?. Saving 2 dolars on cameras?, in what else is Apple cutting corners?.
Does any executive at apple uses this "entry level" products?, or they care more about shareholders, profit and not customers?.
You have to realize that Apple probably saved 2 or 3 dollars by cutting corners on those FaceTime cameras on their Macs. This was very important to Apple.
Haha, blame it on the light. You should work for Apple. They’re good at putting the blame somewhere else.The main light source is a florescent light behind the subject and the secondary light source is your screen. Did you think this was going to produce a quality shot?
Absolutely. The word "awful" is not being misused here like other commenters have stated.I'd even say those 2015 MBA photos are better than the 2018 MBP photos.
Haha, blame it on the light. You should work for Apple. They’re good at putting the blame somewhere else.
In all fairness, most users care about thinness and lightness more than the facetime camera. I would like to see usage stats because I would estimate that most MacBook users have never used their facetime cameras more than once.That happens when you spend all the money on making notebooks thinner instead of putting in better components and then decide how thin it can be.
Greed. Cost cutting. More greed.
I think I might be done with Apple. But, I am reluctant to use Windows/Android.