Yes, I will very likely be trading in both my current iPhone, and likely my iPad as well, for the folding iPhone.
Price? Well as I just said, I’m trading in two devices for one, but also I think the price element is being overstated a bit. Even with the current iPhone Pro Max, if you do literally any storage upgrades, buy any slightly premium accessories, anything, you’re already closer to $2000 then $1000 in terms of pure price. Plus smart phones are already backed up by tons of carrier plans, discounts, trade-ins and monthly installments that you are never going to actually see the $2000+ leave your account unless you literally just purchased a phone unlocked completely outright with absolutely no trade-ins. That’s not how most people buy phones.
Durability? One word, AppleCare. I already pay for it on my iPhone and my iPad, getting rid of both and replacing it with one device likely won’t be changing the price very much. And if the durability is that horrible, if it’s truly another “butterfly keyboard” situation, Apple will pay just like they did with the butterfly keyboard.
Seriously, these criticisms just seem so lame to me. The foldable market is pretty set, Samsung sells over 5 million foldable every year and their top-of-the-line starts out at $2000 just like Apple’s will. If Samsung can sell $2000 phones in the seven digits, Apple can sell $2000 phones in the eight digits.
People keep trying to compare this to the launch of the Vision Pro, but there’s no comparison to be made other than both are expensive.
The Vision Pro is a big unknown product in a very not well developed product category with absolutely no carriers or payment options behind it, with an unknown use case and an undeveloped audience.
The folding iPhone is… Just another smart phone. People know what smart phones are, people have smart phones, people use smart phones, people pay a lot of money for smart phones. It’s not comparable to the headset at all, because a headset is not a smart phone.