Correct, that's exactly the problem the article is trying to describe. It's not SUPPOSED to do that. That was never the agreement. It's only supposed to throttle their "partners" video streaming. As it stands, it's a violation of net neutrality and I encourage the FCC to pounce on them.No, you didn't. It says that while the service can be turned off, when it is turned on it affects all video not just partner video. This is not the same as being unable to turn it off.