Most major shows ARE 4K but the cable broadcasters only dump out 1080p. So unless they've worked some deal to let YTTV grab source 4K streams from the various networks (if they even do that), I don't see the benefit. Yet.
Not really. They started out picking a niche and all of them chose to exclude certain larger networks in order to keep costs down.But they always were what they were trying to kill. They are just the same cable package except delivered over the internet.
They don't own the channels. They have to pay for the channels and resell them to the customer sorta speak. The channels (media companies behind them) dictate the terms for the most part.
Not really. They started out picking a niche and all of them chose to exclude certain larger networks in order to keep costs down.
Now they all have agreements with everyone except Bally Sports and the price shows. The only one that has stuck to its roots is Sling TV and you see it with the low cost of entry. Gone are the days of $35 YTTV, Hulu, and DirecTV Now (or whatever it's called now) because they're all trying to be exactly what cable already is.
It’s about half of what I was paying for DirecTV. I have multiple people able to share my account without needing a dish or a box. The “main channels” are a small fraction fraction of what’s available.I remember thinking Youtube TV was a good idea when it came out. Now it's no different to cable or satellite TV except for bandwidth demands.
I couldn't imagine paying for TV, especially when the main channels are all available in HD OTA for free. I can't remember the last time I even watched live TV.
I gave up cable tv / streaming tv service when ATT TV Now raise their prices this last time. I stream my purchased iTunes shows and movies, along with my year free of Apple TV+ and my ripped shows and movies. I like not having a tv streaming bill.
Looking at this from a VoD perspective (digital code) anything you buy online would be better from iTunes Movies or MoviesAnywhere because they both present 4K HDR10 streams usually at 32 Mbps Max peak. Whats YouTube TV going to offer comparably?Most major shows ARE 4K but the cable broadcasters only dump out 1080p. So unless they've worked some deal to let YTTV grab source 4K streams from the various networks (if they even do that), I don't see the benefit. Yet.
20.00$? We've reached peak Bit Coin.....
Google today announced the launch of a new "4K Plus" plan for YouTube TV subscribers, which will allow for streaming in 4K on a compatible TV and set-top box.
![]()
Along with 4K streaming, the 4K Plus option includes an option to download shows for watching offline and unlimited streaming when connected to home WiFi.
4K Plus is priced at an additional $19.99 per month on top of the standard YouTube TV streaming price, which starts at $65. That means subscribers can expect to pay $85 per month to watch YouTube TV in 4K, though Google is offering a promotion.
New users can get a one-month free trial and then will pay $9.99 per month for a year, after which the price will increase to $19.99 per month.
For all YouTube TV subscribers, Google is adding 5.1 Dolby audio capabilities, which will start rolling out to select devices "in the coming weeks." YouTube TV 4K Plus is available for customers starting today, with the feature accessible under membership settings on any browser.
Article Link: YouTube TV Gains Support for 4K Streaming and 5.1 Surround Sound
Don't worry....as with Apple the Congress critters will come to our rescue LOL..LOL...LOL...LOL.....To be fair, both Google and Netflix are charging 30% premium for 4K. IMO, both premiums are inexcusable.
To charge that much extra monthly just to raise the resolution of content they did not even create is outrageous. Is Google going to share some of the 4k profit with the creators?
Google today announced the launch of a new "4K Plus" plan for YouTube TV subscribers, which will allow for streaming in 4K on a compatible TV and set-top box.
![]()
Along with 4K streaming, the 4K Plus option includes an option to download shows for watching offline and unlimited streaming when connected to home WiFi.
4K Plus is priced at an additional $19.99 per month on top of the standard YouTube TV streaming price, which starts at $65. That means subscribers can expect to pay $85 per month to watch YouTube TV in 4K, though Google is offering a promotion.
New users can get a one-month free trial and then will pay $9.99 per month for a year, after which the price will increase to $19.99 per month.
For all YouTube TV subscribers, Google is adding 5.1 Dolby audio capabilities, which will start rolling out to select devices "in the coming weeks." YouTube TV 4K Plus is available for customers starting today, with the feature accessible under membership settings on any browser.
Article Link: YouTube TV Gains Support for 4K Streaming and 5.1 Surround Sound
who says the "creators" aren't charging Google more for 4k content?To charge that much extra monthly just to raise the resolution of content they did not even create is outrageous. Is Google going to share some of the 4k profit with the creators?
Is that what YouTube TV is? I honestly don't know. Is that the same thing as YouTube Red?I don't get it. Youtube TV is basically Cable TV over streaming. What content on Cable TV is 4k?
But the competition (for anyone tech savvy and with decent connectivity) is not cable! It is one or more of Prime, HBO Max, Netflix, or Disney+. Any one of those is much cheaper, higher quality, and has enough content to satisfy most people.Still better than cable. Show me a cable with the same channel line up, unlimited streams, unlimited DVR and offline DVR downloads, cancel anytime with a single click and ability to pause. I'll wait.
If you are allowed to split it like that, then yeah, that is a great deal.For certain situations, YouTube TV is vastly superior to Xfinity. My single YouTube TV subscription is split between three households — mom, sister + brother-in-law and me. We all have our own profiles with our own recorded content. We can watch on all our devices, anytime, anywhere, and have never run into any issues unless we run afoul of the maximum of three simultaneous streams. And, with three households contributing to the overall cost, it's significantly cheaper than Comcast. Plus, the unlimited DVR is amazing
Holy Nelly, $85 per month to stare at a box? With Disney, Netflix, Stan, Paramount+, and Prime this is getting back to old 90’s cable TV prices. Cable TV was attractive vs broadcast TV when it started as it has no ads, but given that google are advertising whores I guess it all makes sense.
Google today announced the launch of a new "4K Plus" plan for YouTube TV subscribers, which will allow for streaming in 4K on a compatible TV and set-top box.
![]()
Along with 4K streaming, the 4K Plus option includes an option to download shows for watching offline and unlimited streaming when connected to home WiFi.
4K Plus is priced at an additional $19.99 per month on top of the standard YouTube TV streaming price, which starts at $65. That means subscribers can expect to pay $85 per month to watch YouTube TV in 4K, though Google is offering a promotion.
New users can get a one-month free trial and then will pay $9.99 per month for a year, after which the price will increase to $19.99 per month.
For all YouTube TV subscribers, Google is adding 5.1 Dolby audio capabilities, which will start rolling out to select devices "in the coming weeks." YouTube TV 4K Plus is available for customers starting today, with the feature accessible under membership settings on any browser.
Article Link: YouTube TV Gains Support for 4K Streaming and 5.1 Surround Sound
Why what?
Because the speed has not improved nor has the price decreased in 5 years. It should be doing both over time.Why do you think $45 a month for gigabit internet and 220 channels is expensive?