Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
I’m never going to subscribe. Way too expensive and they probably make you watch ads after you’re paying that much lol. No thanks. Never doing it.
The ad breaks are determineD by the channels themselves not YouTube
[automerge]1593554047[/automerge]
I'm really considering canceling and going over to Hulu + Live TV and saving $10 a month. I have little to often no interest in channels YouTube TV is adding, so I'm not too happy about paying for them. I thought their existing lineup was largely fine.
Don’t forget another $10 just to fast forward through commercials
 
YouTube is relying on their two main differentiators - six individuals can use one account on unlimited devices and and DVR storage is unlimited. Depending on your situation those can be strong incentives.
 
I'm really considering canceling and going over to Hulu + Live TV and saving $10 a month. I have little to often no interest in channels YouTube TV is adding, so I'm not too happy about paying for them. I thought their existing lineup was largely fine.

Funny, I cancelled Hulu TV recently. Slimming down to Philo ($16 grandfathered rate) and locast. I also pay for Prime.
 
yeah that’s hilarious that he thinks it’s a good deal even with internet included.

for reference the only monthly fee I pay for entertainment is Crunchyroll and iTunes Music, totaling $13 (university discount for iTunes). And even that is excessive I think considering I also have to pay $10 monthly for Apple Watch cell service with Tmobile.
It could be a good price depending on where you are for 150 and four premium channels
 
Apparently, sports providers are hiking the price to make up for the loss of revenue due to pandemics. Which is ironic since there are almost zero sports contents these days.

$65 is roughly equivalent to getting all 7 major streaming services:
  1. Amazon Prime: $12.99
  2. Apple TV+: $4.99
  3. CBS All Access: $5.99
  4. Disney+: $6.99
  5. HBO Max: $14.99
  6. Hulu: $5.99
  7. Netflix: 12.99
Maybe I just have too many other things to do, but I would never have the time to utilise that many services..... 😬
Do people spend most of the day watching stuff.... 🤔
 
YouTube is relying on their two main differentiators - six individuals can use one account on unlimited devices and and DVR storage is unlimited. Depending on your situation those can be strong incentives.
Is it fully unlimited now or is it either space or time limited? YTTV and Vue were the only ones we liked because they were space unlimited but time limited, but anytime the same show was on it reset the timer.
 
  • Like
Reactions: jwdsail
Look at this price point, it’s now a cable alternative instead of a cable competitor. And it still has a superior UI, features and portability where is
Does ESPN offer a live TV option?

Sure if you like lacross and other fringe sports on ESPN+. But whaif you want to watch your local MLB team on a fox sports RSN or even a NFL game on fox or cbs? You need need a basic “cable package” to get those local channels.

Espn does not equal all sports. Not like
a long shot.
 
I'm really considering canceling and going over to Hulu + Live TV and saving $10 a month. I have little to often no interest in channels YouTube TV is adding, so I'm not too happy about paying for them. I thought their existing lineup was largely fine.
How long before Hulu bumps. The will for sure wait to get the YT cancels but then how long.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Plutonius
YouTube is relying on their two main differentiators - six individuals can use one account on unlimited devices and and DVR storage is unlimited. Depending on your situation those can be strong incentives.

at this price point it’s an Apples to apples comparison with cable, and they still win. The points you mention above PLUS no contracts or equipment fees. And added portability. We just got back from a beach house rental and I downloaded yttv app on the main tv and had instant access to my channel list and dvr. Cable can’t top that.
 
For $65 dollars, that's pretty insane, especially since that's about the same as cable. But what most fail to realize is that Live TV is truly a premium (especially for sports). More and more sports are no longer being broadcasted OTA (especially in Philly, where Comcast owns most sports broadcasting). Most people probably can be fine without live TV, but if you're a big sports fan, both cable and Live-TV-over-internet services (like Youtube TV and Hulu Live) have you for sure.
 
  • Like
Reactions: jwdsail
YouTube is relying on their two main differentiators - six individuals can use one account on unlimited devices and and DVR storage is unlimited. Depending on your situation those can be strong incentives.

6 users can be added to a YouTube TV account, but only 3 can watch at any one time. The unlimited storage is definitely a big plus. I don't know how the other services are now as I haven't used anything other than YouTube TV since it was released, but there were a lot of complaints about buffering in other services.
 
  • Like
Reactions: xpxp2002
Okay I’ll Also make a case for YouTube tv. Previously I used Dish; I paid for a couple receivers with DVR, a couple other receivers, local channels, high def (yes had to pay for HDTV) which totaled around $165 a month. Now with YTTV I basically have all the channels I used to have (finally got Comedy Central), unlimited DVR, access on all my devices all for $65. For me it’s a no brainer. Granted, I’ll be complaining like everyone else if they raise it anymore now (which of course they will), but I’m still way ahead from where I was. Yes, I’m not factoring in my internet cost but I would still have that cost even if I was still with Dish
Exactly why not afraid to raise their prices.
 
For $65 dollars, that's pretty insane, especially since that's about the same as cable. But what most fail to realize is that Live TV is truly a premium (especially for sports). More and more sports are no longer being broadcasted OTA (especially in Philly, where Comcast owns most sports broadcasting). Most people probably can be fine without live TV, but if you're a big sports fan, both cable and Live-TV-over-internet services (like Youtube TV and Hulu Live) have you for sure.

Agree - if not for sports and the news I could easily live without any of them. But, as a big sports fan, it's not an option yet.
 
  • Like
Reactions: jwdsail
For $65 dollars, that's pretty insane, especially since that's about the same as cable. But what most fail to realize is that Live TV is truly a premium (especially for sports). More and more sports are no longer being broadcasted OTA (especially in Philly, where Comcast owns most sports broadcasting). Most people probably can be fine without live TV, but if you're a big sports fan, both cable and Live-TV-over-internet services (like Youtube TV and Hulu Live) have you for sure.

as I’ve said in another reply at $65 it’s a cable competitor, not a cable alternative. IMO if you want live channels, it’s superior to cable. if
You don’t, move on.
 
Well, I'm glad I was not apart of the cord-cutting group. As I stuck it out with my Cable bundled with the Internet [150MB down 15MB up] which gives me HBO,MAX,SHO,Stars for $165 while I do have NetFlix and signed up for Disney + with the 3yr promotion awhile back...

150MB down and 15MB up is pretty entry level by today's world internet standards. You can get 300/300 for $40 a month on most major providers. Is cable TV for $125, even including those "premium" channels, really worth it?
 
  • Disagree
Reactions: NetMage
Streaming services are as equally, if not more, fragmented and expensive as subscribing to Cable TV.
 
  • Disagree
Reactions: NetMage
I think this just hastens the death of traditional live television regardless if it is distributed over cable or a streaming service.

I work for a small business and my boss pays for Youtube TV for business news. I am able to piggy back off it at home. However, I notice I rarely touch it. I am so use to on-demand content these days.
 
Why is this so expensive anyway? I mean, for $65 a month you can subscribe to pretty much all the major streaming services (Netflix, Disney+, HBO, Hulu, CBS) and watch pretty much everything.

It has the best one-stop interface out of all of them, and the youtube TV app is available widely. You don't need to subscribe to 5+ services to get all your content (remember netflix of yesteryear?).

It also has the best sports and live TV package too.

I previously canceled my Youtube TV package at $45 per month, but now I'm regretting it. The value just gets better over time.

My biggest gripe with it is that recorded DVR expires much like regular DVR does, due to content licensing deals. So, you really own nothing. Sure, you can browse in seasons shows, and stream them for 3 months at a time, but they disappear after that.

It also has Google's recommendation engine (AI/algos) for the discovery of new shows, something the other platforms don't have. Netflix is ok at it, but Google has all your data.

I've personally jumped on the iTunes train (sales and cheap digital codes) so I can actually own my content forever from multiple publishers. But even so, iTunes lacks live content and doesn't have a great recommendation engine, and doesn't let you casually binge watch random crap.

Consider this, $65 for YouTube TV, or $65 towards a permanent iTunes library content? I went with the latter.
 
  • Like
Reactions: xpxp2002
Man, I remember when Direct TV NOW offered a free Apple TV 4k for pre paying 3 months @ $35.

What a deal!

Indeed! I signed up for that deal and still use the free Apple TV, but ditched DTN last year as it was the same thing as YT-TV now, prices going up and up and up. Switched to Sling for $25, they raised it to $30 and I cancelled. Am happy with Netflix, Hulu/D+/ESPN package, CBS and YT premium. I get Peacock for free as I have Comcast Internet.
 
$15 per month for a bunch of garbage channels. You can get a low end Netflix subscription for about half the price, and Netflix at least has a pretty solid selection of shows and movies. The only channel in this Paramount/Viacom package that is actually worth anything is TV Land. I would only pay $2-3 per month for it though, not $15.
 
I just want to have a version that skips ads, I’d be willing to pay $5 a month for it.

Limited content, but Hulu no adds is great. Actually becoming what watch the most. We do the entry level Hulu... not that package with lots of channels. We also get 30+ local channels free with our antennae.
 
  • Like
Reactions: compwiz1202
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.