Just stream something from Netflix, Amazon, or Apple's own iTunes Store, DVDs aren't really that useful anymore. In any case, why would your girlfriend have a DVD and no means to watch it at her home? As for the rest, pretty simple, how about a USB thumb drive or an SD card? Much smaller, more rugged, naturally R/W, potentially much faster for access and way faster than CD/DVD +/-RW, and holds significantly more than a CD or DVD, and just like the thumb drive that Apple now ships for system restores on the MacBook Airs.
This is if we want to watch a movie in a room that isn't the common room; this happens at least once a week, mind you. And no, I'm not ripping every DVD I own on the optical drive I don't have in the machine, thanks.
As I said, if you need an optical drive just get one, no real reason to penalize everyone with the inclusion of a large and mostly unused optical drive just because you want to install Office or Final Cut (something you typically do once or twice during the entire lifetime of your computer). Besides that, as I mentioned earlier, if Apple begins to remove optical drives from the MacBook Pros the software companies are going to be pretty much forced to go to online distribution. Either that, or if worse comes to worst, they will just ship on flash-memory-based media (again, like Apple does for the system restores on the MacBook Airs).
Who said anything about it being a penalty? Frankly, it's more of a penalty of inconvenience to have to carry around an external ODD. Also, excluding the few people here, the amount of people pushing for the removal of the optical drive are in the vast MINORITY. You don't cite practical reasons as to why the ODD will be gone within the next three refreshes, whereas I'm citing nothing but practical reasons as to why it won't.
Purchase or rental? I don't see that those terms make a difference when it comes to software. Technically, you really don't purchase software or movies, you may "own" the physical media but you merely have a limited license for the content. In any case, your argument doesn't negate the convenience and cost savings that you get with internet-based delivery. Furthermore, with software you eventually end up transferring the content to your computer's hard drive which generally isn't the case for movies on DVD and Blu-ray. Let's face it if you HAD to transfer a movie from a DVD before you could use it wouldn't you consider the DVD a mere transfer medium, one that might be considered a kind of nuisance to store and maintain -- other than for backup? So, if the content (movie or software) was always available online, safe and secure wouldn't that be a good alternative? And why do you exclude the example of downloadable music versus audio CDs -- was it because it didn't support your argument?
Music makes more sense to be computer centric. Movies don't...yet. Plus you can burn a music CD whereas you can't with a movie. Also, you're telling me that they will first remove the optical drive which'll force the Internet based alternatives? What sense does that make? And what if my internet connection is spotty? You keep dodging that point because it doesn't fit YOUR argument.
If you strip out the optical drive and do away with the NVIDIA chip set then you could probably afford a mid-range discrete GPU with only a minor increase in price (I've already proposed that a Sandy Bridge-based 13" MacBook Pro with a discrete GPU might increase in cost by $100). This also neatly eliminates your main justification for elimination of the 13" MacBook Pro -- that being that it isn't "pro" enough and is too close in features to the existing white MacBook. Frankly, I don't think that the white MacBook is ever going to be redesigned again -- it will stay with the Core 2 Duo and NVIDIA integrated graphics until it is discontinued within the next year. That means that there is plenty of room for a really "pro" 13" MacBook between the current low-end at $999 and the cheapest 15" MacBook Pro at $1799. That price range doesn't seem to be a "fairy tale" to me.
They're not going to kill the optical drive in the next couple of refreshes so your above point is pretty much moot to begin with. Were it likely, sure, that'd give Apple a means of differentiating the 13" Pro from the other two 13" machines. But that's not even remotely likely. This is why I should've just dismissed your point to begin with.
Even more battery life isn't better? I think you're overreaching for a justification.
You're entire argument start to finish does just that.
Besides that, if they don't go for a larger battery then they can just go for a smaller and more light-weight system, more ports, more features, or all three. There are lots of things they could do with the space that is currently being used by the optical drive. I will admit, though, that one problem with the MacBook Airs is their limited battery life and that does make the white MacBook an attractive offer for those who need longer battery life.
Better battery life WITH an optical drive. Unless you really need that thin of a computer in which case, why aren't you just sticking with an Air anyway?
Do you think they would change the design of the Macbook pro this time around? The current design is amazing, but im starting to feel that it looks slightly outdated.
Nope.
aluminium based macbooks are more durable than the plastic counterparts and
they don't look like coming out from a coal mine after 1+ year of usage , current macbook whites are prone to dirt , and yes its plastic.
Aluminum dents, plastic dings Aluminum may be the stronger material, but it's not the most durable at all.
and you can't buy a macbook white + 256GB SSD for the price less than $1199
You can buy a refurbished white MacBook and put in a 2.5" 256GB SSD for less than that amount, you just can't do so from Apple.
third is that , i don't think many consumers are ready to accept SSD as their main storage mainly because of the cost per GB .
And that's fair. I'm certainly not ready for it yet.
If they keep the C2D in the 13in I hope it's at least the 2.66 and they get rid of the 2.4.
or at least just a single 2.53 config.