good job Baldy. My expensive phone can't do what free phones can and has been able to for almost a decade. I'm so glad that only 14.6% (which is still in the millions and millions) isn't enough people.
With your logic, why should they even bother to add any features at all? There should be an ipod button, safari, telephone, and mail button. Why add silly things like stocks or weather?
BTW, I guarantee you that there's fewer people who actually use the youtube button or the stocks button than the number of people who would use MMS.
Most people do not have e-mail capability on their phones but almost have MMS. If you want to get information to someone with media, it's a smarter idea to have MMS support. You can even e-mail using MMS. 14.6% is a high demand area. Not even 10% probably use the weather application and it's there and it makes my life easier.
You are missing my point. I'm just trying to point out that there are actually reasons that Apple has not (yet) included MMS. To me, the two most likely are:
1. MMS is not popular enough to be a priority for the current release of the iPhone software. Maybe they will get to it eventually. Just because you make up numbers for weather or stock application use doesn't mean that they are less popular.
2. Apple believes that MMS is a crappy way send pictures and video. MMS does have interoperability issues and is extremely limited compared to email. Why support MMS if they believe something else is better suited for the task? "Just because everyone else is doing it" isn't always the best policy.
The free phones have been doing MMS for the last decade instead of email because they are crappy. MMS was developed because all these phones were too limited to support internet messaging standards. It also provided a way for the carriers to charge you on a per message basis. An (expensive) iPhone is capable of handling messaging in a better way. Why prop up an inferior standard that is more expensive?