That´s the memory i bought: G.Skill RipJaws F3-1886C10D-16GRSL
16GB ordered, we'll see how it works on its own without the 8GB and then I will order another 16GB. The iMac arrived a day early !
That´s the memory i bought: G.Skill RipJaws F3-1886C10D-16GRSL
16GB ordered, we'll see how it works on its own without the 8GB and then I will order another 16GB. The iMac arrived a day early !
Nice! Should run a geek bench and post results!
I just got off the phone with Kingston and the correct part number is now KTA-MB1600L/8G. The "L" means Low Voltage... Not mixed Voltage, Not 1.35v/1.5v. A day of reading blogs seems to confirm that the low voltage RAM fixes the problem in many or all cases.
Apple obviously changed the specs and if you think about it, it makes sense. The system is not supplying enough voltage to power all the modules properly when maxed to 32GB. Maybe at a lower amount of memory or with some of the modules not gobbling up a full 1.5v, but not at 32GB X 1.5v.
If you add 1.5V RAM to the stock Apple 1.35V RAM, as I have done, all of the modules will run at 1.5V and you should have zero issues.It is important to note that DDR3L memory modules can run at either1.35V or the standard 1.5V.
As mentioned, DDR3L 1.35V RAM is obviously fully supported, but so are standard DDR3 1.5V modules.
Good quality DDR3L is also more expensive, at least here in Japan. Aside from the voltage, the specs are identical. Again, DDR3L will run perfectly at 1.5V.
Personally, I'm not overly concerned with the minimal increase in power consumption on my desktop Mac anyway and I've had no heat issues to speak of.
Using 1.5V on new iMac ( 4 modules together ) will cause Kernel panic under Mavericks and BSOD under Windows.
While I can't dispute that claim from personal experience, having not populated all 4 slots with 1.5v-only modules, I find it highly doubtful that the voltage was the cause of your problems. While half of my modules are DDR3L, they are all running at 1.5v. Haswell has no problems powering 1.5V RAM.
Furthermore, on Apple's own technical specifications page for the Late 2013 iMac, they make no mention of low voltage RAM at all. In fact, they specify:
8GB (two 4GB) of 1600MHz DDR3 memory; four user-accessible SO-DIMM slots
Configurable to 16GB or 32GB.
Contrast this with the specs page for the Late 2013 rMBP and you can see they do clearly know the difference and specify (for example):
8GB of 1600MHz DDR3L onboard memory
Configurable to 16GB.
Even on the Memory Specifications page for the iMac, it's all about DDR3.
My personal opinion is that Apple started shipping iMacs in 2012 with the 1.35v RAM in order to streamline orders from their suppliers with the notebook line, for which the lower powered DDR3L has a far greater meaning.
At any rate, if you are experiencing crashes with all 1.5v modules, I think you're just dealing with incompatible RAM. The fact that it's 1.5V is circumstantial and irrelevant.
It has been proven that the iMac Haswel series can't provide enough power to 4 DIMMs at 1.5V.
There are dozens of threads and discussions here and on Apple Website related to Kernel panic with 32 GB or RAM. Crucial customers were most of the victims reporting this issue.
If you look at all vendors ( Crucial, Kingston, Samsung, OCZ etc.. ) All their iMac 2013 compatible Memory Modules are Low Voltage one.
What Apple says isn't what the system can do or can't. I learned to never trust everything I read.
My 2 cents..
Can you provide a link to this proof by any chance?
Could that not be evidence that the problem was Crucial and not the voltage?
This is true. I don't dispute it. It's not proof that the iMac doesn't support DDR3 RAM, however.
I'm not trying to call you a liar or discredit your opinion. I'm just asking if it wouldn't be in Apple's best interest to specify DDR3L RAM in their memory specs for the iMac if that was, in fact, required.
It would be no skin off their teeth to do so, and if it was a factor for increased stability, I would think it to be highly beneficial for them.
In the data sheets spec for Haswell from Intel it says "supports low power RAM", but that hardly means it doesn't support standard DDR3 at 1.5v.
Almost all of the issues I've seen on the web with Haswell and RAM voltage is OCing to 1.65v, as you mentioned.
I appreciate your opinions.
Ok where to start. Pardon my laziness but I'm making an effort at 3 AM digging all the threads.
Long story short. All the headache with Crucial customers was because the compatible RAM listed was SKU CT2C8G3S160BMCEU.M16FDD ( 1.35v/1.5V )
They replaced it with CT102464BF160B
8GB DDR3L-1600 SODIMM ( DDR3L 1.35V )
To be honest with you, the 1.5V modules are cheaper than the low voltage ones. We all know Apple; if anything, they would have shipped the late 2013 with 1.5 modules. In our case, the new iMac is shipped with DDRL3 ones.
I hope I convinced you.
From what i've researched iMac's can handle both 1.35 V & 1.5 V RAM.
I'd like to know if either voltages is a better option for the Haswell iMac's.
Could adding 1.5 V potentially harm the computer or is 1.35 V more of a power saving measure?
My hunch is the 1.5 V in an iMac would be fine and 1.35 V would optimise a MBP.
I had ordered Kingston HyperX Plug & Play 1.5V http://www.amazon.co.uk/gp/product/B008H7IGGI/ref=oh_details_o01_s00_i00?ie=UTF8&psc=1 due to it's low latency but know of a more expensive 1.35 V version. I'm wondering whether it's worth getting a lower voltage module set to optimise my computers lifespan.
Any advice or opinion would be really helpful.![]()
Well, I want to make an update on this matter and a mea culpa.
After everything I wrote previously in this thread and all the testing I did with the 1.5V RAM added to the Apple stock 1.35v RAM, I started to get random system lockups. They seemed like kernel panics, only I didn't get the on screen message. It just went grey and froze completely. It usually happened while using a Flash-based web conferencing tool for my job.
I removed the new 1.5v RAM and returned it. I have since ordered 16GB of DDR3L and it will arrive today so I'm hoping for better results.
However, I think the real problem may have been my attempting to run the Apple stock 1.35v RAM together with the 1.5v and not a total incompatibility with the higher voltage modules. I didn't have the time to remove the Apple stock RAM to try the 1.5v alone to test it but I suspect it would have been fine. I specifically bought this iMac with 16GB (2x8GB) so that I would only have to add 2 modules rather than replace any.
I will report back after I've added the 1.35v modules.
I would say that those who are running 1.5v only and have no issues have nothing to worry about but I'd strongly advise against mixing voltages. If you buy your iMac with the intentions of adding to the stock RAM, stick with DDR3L.
You should have listened to me![]()
This I did know, but I was under the mistaken impression that DDR3L also supported 1.5v.Mixing RAMs of different voltage will run them at the highest voltage.
I do know that mobile Haswell-based CPUs do not support 1.5v memory but isn't the i7 in the iMac (i7-4771 in my case) a desktop processor?As said earlier, it looks like the PS can't provide enough juice to all DIMMs at 1.5V.
But I think it is mistaken.This model is powered by a 22 nm, 64-bit "Fourth Generation" Intel Mobile Core i7 "Haswell" (4771) processor with quad cores (four independent processor cores on a single silicon chip, each with one thread).
Haswell iMac will suffer random kernel panic and crash if 4 DIMMs are running @ 1.5V
As previously said I installed 4 Corsair Vengeance DIMMs at 1,5v and no problems for the moment, if something happen I will come back there to share feedback.
Haswell iMac will suffer random kernel panic and crash if 4 DIMMs are running @ 1.5V
...
As said earlier, it looks like the PS can't provide enough juice to all DIMMs at 1.5V.
Can you check the voltage running across the module ?
1.35V/1.5V is different from 1.5V/1.65V