Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Why does Apple still sell 13" MBP?

Because:
  • Supply chain issues mean it's better to continue making the same chassis they've been making for the last 7 years. The supply chain and manufacturing for this computer is a sure bet for Apple in these times.
  • Nothing else to slot in between $1200 Air and $2,000 14" MBP. Not until 15" Air comes out next year.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Tagbert
This is to be expected. My M1 Air utterly decimates the classic Mac Pro I'm typing on right now.
I mean to be fair, you're comparing a computer released in 2021 to one released in 2010. There is zero surprise here.

However, for workloads that require specific graphics and high core count workloads, higher-end Mac Pros ($7k+) will outperform most M1 and M2 devices by a wide margin due to the memory limitations.
 
  • Like
Reactions: MisterAndrew
Mac Pro base users be like in denial over this…

😄😄😄

D9DCF15F-984B-4838-963A-0C3AD56EA8E6.jpeg
 
Heck my MacPro 5,1 (2010) get decent scores compared to (2019 - 8 cores)
7000 vs. 8,000 on multi-thread - its only 12-14% slower - hardly noticeable.
(Yes I know single-thread is weak) but still not bad for a 12 year old computer with 14 year old CPU.
 

Attachments

  • Geekbench oct 28 2021.png
    Geekbench oct 28 2021.png
    67.4 KB · Views: 68
  • Wow
Reactions: wilhoitm
It’s an interesting comparison, but this is to be expected from a newer CPU. The latest Intel CPUs are also faster than the older CPUs in the Mac Pro. The Mac Pro is still significantly better than any MBP at accomplishing all sorts of demanding tasks on a 24/7 basis.
 
  • Like
Reactions: startergo
Click bait at its best.
Geekbench isn't real world.
Run real apps with large memory footprints for data and the application.
1. If they don't fit in real memory (remember you can't expand memory) you can cause excessive thrashing with swap.
2. Don't even talk about GPU performance. The M2 doesn't even come close to the graphics of a standalone card with more VRAM that the MacBook has RAM that is shared between system and graphics.
3. Thermals are going to kill the laptop. It might be good at a sprint but it will have a meltdown in a marathon.
 
I mean to be fair, you're comparing a computer released in 2021 to one released in 2010. There is zero surprise here.

However, for workloads that require specific graphics and high core count workloads, higher-end Mac Pros ($7k+) will outperform most M1 and M2 devices by a wide margin due to the memory limitations.
True. But, the fact that still amazes me is that the 2010 computer is THE top end and the 2020 computer is the very bottom. That’s how far we’ve come.

And to the old Mac Pro’s credit, I’ve tried to bog it down and failed. It handles my workload without the slightest flinch. It’s just mind boggling how big of a leap Apple Silicon really is.
 
  • Like
Reactions: wilhoitm
While fascinating that the CPU is so strong, the M2 isn’t even close. If I am buying a Mac Pro today it’ll be for the beefy GPU’s and because I need more than 128 GB of RAM. Oh and I’ll be using at least one PCIe slot for a dual 25 Gbps NIC.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.