I'm trying to get some feedback from those that have bought the new 13" MacBook Pro as to whether the screen is updated from the one used in the early unibody MacBooks.
I'm one of those unlucky first adopters and this screen just isn't up to par with the beautiful 15" MBP's screen.
Yes it has been updated. The early macbook screens looked milky and did not have a great range of colours. This screen is much better, and the viewing angle has increased. I remember seeing pics of the old macbook in the dark slighly to the side, and you couldnt see the screen. I am very happy with this 13" screen.
As for other comments about the res, it is 1280 x 800 which is not that great, however it is roughly the same pixel density of all their external screens. So what does that mean? I means that if you plug in an external monitor and drag one window from the laptop to the external screen, the size of it stays the same. Where as if the res was higher on the laptop it would expand when you drag it to the external monitor.
While this might not be that interesting for most people, for me I simply cant work on a 13" screen alone, so I have a 23" at home and a 30" at work.
I do a lot of photography in the field so the portability is the main thing for me. I can do a shoot, dump my photos, then review when I get to either of my massive screens!! The SD card slot is a weird choice as most pro cameras (inc my 5d markII) use CF, however my wife's camera has SD.
The screen by it self is fine for email, web, etc etc, but if you need to work in hires get an external screen as well. If you want the the most portable Macbook Pro, then this is a great choice.
(this was typed on one using a 30" screen!!!)