Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

Which connector is your new unibody Macbook pro

  • Sata I - 1.5Gbit

    Votes: 218 69.6%
  • Sata II - 3.0Gbit

    Votes: 95 30.4%

  • Total voters
    313
Not much. They are talking about the speed at which the hard drive can send data through the connector cable to the computer. 3.0GBit SATA can send 300 Megabyte per second, 1.5GBit SATA can send 150 Megabyte per second.

However, that is the speed at which data can be sent through the cable. The hard drive cannot actually read data from the disk at that speed. That is at the moment limited to maybe 80 or 90 Megabyte per second. So at the moment, 1.5 GBit SATA vs. 3.0 GBit doesn't make much difference for a laptop. It would make a difference if you connect a RAID drive to a MacPro that can exceed the 150 Megabyte per second limit of 1.5 GBit SATA.

For comparison: Firewire 400 has a maximum of 50 Megabyte per second, Firewire 800 has a limit of 100 Megabyte per second. So Firewire 400 _does_ actually slow a fast external hard drive down.

The people that find this SATA-I discovery very worrisome, are the people looking to add an SSD drive. Most people know that their platter drive isn't going to cap out SATA-I.
 
Just been on the phone to the apple store regarding the SATA interfaces on the macbook pro 13" they confirmed it should be 3.0 and note 1.5. They have checked there models in store on display and out of 5 systems two reported 1.5 and the rest 3.0. They couldn't explain what the difference was but they did say 1.5 was the cheaper option which would make sense. Need to get onto to Apple support regarding this as my macbook is in the air on route.

I went for the 13-inch: 2.53GHz
 
hmm thanks guys. i see my first gen mb is running at 1.5 with the wd 500gig 5400 (got earlier this year)

In your case it won't make any difference. Any traditional hard drive is incapable of exceeding SATA1 limitations.

The fastest SSDs like Intel and OCZ Vertex are slightly limited by it though.
 
Some benchmark by a user here also showed that his Vertex 250 GB is showing a 110MB/s sequential read maximum. This is strange as that's more than half the speed loss from the advertised o OCZ.

I figured the only way this is possible is if the SATA controller is capped at 1.5 Gb/s, rather than the 3 Gb/s it is supposed to have.

Linky: Click me
 
Some benchmark by a user here also showed that his Vertex 250 GB is showing a 110MB/s sequential read maximum. This is strange as that's more than half the speed loss from the advertised o OCZ.

I figured the only way this is possible is if the SATA controller is capped at 1.5 Gb/s, rather than the 3 Gb/s it is supposed to have.

Linky: Click me

Apple has some explaining to do. Welcome to 5 years ago.
 
Great

I was planning to upgrade my new baby with a SSD drive a little later. I hope this isn't true. You know what they say about something sounding too good to be true and I thought the 13 MBP sounded perfect for me.
 
I just checked my 13" MBP 2.26 and it also displays 1.5 for the SATA connection.
 
I just checked my 13" MBP 2.26 and it also displays 1.5 for the SATA connection.

i just got off the phone with apple,

the 2.26 carries the 1.5gbit connector and he couldent tell me a anything about the 2.53, except that some have 1.5 and some 3.0
 
i just got off the phone with apple,

the 2.26 carries the 1.5gbit connector and he couldent tell me a anything about the 2.53, except that some have 1.5 and some 3.0

so retarrded. i wonder what we can do about this since nowhere on apple's website did they show this major difference.
 
i just got off the phone with apple,

the 2.26 carries the 1.5gbit connector and he couldent tell me a anything about the 2.53, except that some have 1.5 and some 3.0

Well apparently I have one of the 2.53 that has a 1.5 :mad: Guess I'm going to be making a trip back to the Apple store. Although, if they have no way to know which has what, they'll probably not be helpful.
 
i will recall apple a few times, to make this info is accurate...sometimes i get different answers every-time...but it looks to be this way :*(
 
Brand new 13" MBP, installed a Western Digital Black 7200RPM 320GB HD and it's reporting Sata 1.5 when it's a Sata 3 drive.

For a 7200 rpm drive, SATA 1.5 vs. SATA 3.0 doesn't really matter. You'll never hit the maximum transfer speed. For a 1.5 Gb connections, that's ~120ish MB/s. No 7200 rpm hard drive transfers faster than 100 MB/s...

If true, is is only an issue with SSDs.
 
1.5 Gigabit is confirmed by apple engineering

I just got off the phone with Apple engineering and they are confirming that the speed on the 13 inch mbp is 1.5 Gigabit, not 3.0 as previous gen was.

They said that cost was probably the deciding factor for this which makes absolutely no sense since it is the same chip.

So there you go. Like it or not.
 
Really horrible move

If this is true I am so sad for apple today.

Come on. Drop the price, but also take out standard features?? I guess this is the new face of apple. Cancelled SSD order till further notice. Man these guys are slick!
 
Is there no one at apple that thought this might be a problem? And what sort of weird manufacturing process randomly puts different parts in some the laptops?

this will be a total crapshoot for anyone that wants to install an ssd.
 
Is there no one at apple that thought this might be a problem? And what sort of weird manufacturing process randomly puts different parts in some the laptops?

this will be a total crapshoot for anyone that wants to install an ssd.

using up stock from somthing possible?

hard to say with apple....maybe they scrapped the 3g at the end
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.