Apple is executing some products exceptionally well, but others poorly. The MacBook lineup is currently a mess, and they need to streamline that. Get the teams working on each model actually talking to each other!
It's really quite a simple fix. Ditch the 13" MacBook Pro with M2. If Apple did this, it would make things immediately less confusing. The 15" MacBook Air has been rumored to replace this product but we'll see about that.Apple is executing some products exceptionally well, but others poorly. The MacBook lineup is currently a mess, and they need to streamline that. Get the teams working on each model actually talking to each other!
... and the single USB port. And the piss poor butterfly keyboard that sucked to type on even when it wasn't broken.People forget that outside of Intel the biggest problem with the 12 inch MacBook was the price.
Picked up one a 2015 for $350, wonderful little laptop! Very light and compact. Keyboard is not that bad. Just that it is way underpowered and was way over priced with only one port. One port would be "workable" if you were able to use the USB-C adpater with power to charge at the same time...but the laptop is designed not to be able to use power and HDMI etc. at the same time (probably would blow out the logic board). It is a laptop that is battery focused design (kind of like an macOS iPad), but Apple does not have any more batteries for replacement and therefore if we want to continue using it, we have to go with third party. VERY difficult to replace the battery since it is glued etc.Always wanted a 12” MacBook, but disliked that keyboard and felt it was just too under powered and a tad overpriced. All three things could be remedied now. Shame If the don’t move forward with it.
12" Macbook could not take over the spot because it was way underpowered and the price point at the time of launch was way too expensive. Now with the power of the M-series, they might be able to get the price point that they want and have the small form factor be successful. Too bad.The M1 Air (1.29kg) is the same weight as the previous Intel Air (1.29kg). The M2 Air is slightly lighter (1.2kg). I did a rough extrapolation for a 15” MBA and it would still be lighter than the 14” MBP.
Air means different things in Apple’s product naming scheme. In iPads it seems to mean the middle of the line product. In laptops it has often but not always been the thinnest and lightest.
A thin and light 15” laptop would be the thinnest and lightest of the larger screen MacBooks, so you could make a case for calling it an Air. Apple could call it a MacBook (plain) but they seem to have settled on using the power of the ”Air” name after their failure to get the 12” MacBook to take over that spot.
Instead:
iPhone: 5,8" + 6,4"
iPhone Pro: 6,1" + 6,7"
MacBook Air: 12" + 15"
MacBook Pro: 14" + 16"
Air means different things in Apple’s product naming scheme. In iPads it seems to mean the middle of the line product. In laptops it has often but not always been the thinnest and lightest.
Macbook 12 for professional use. It's not an "entry" product.I don't see any need for a 12" macbook. The 13" mba is a great entry level product, imo. I'd rather see apple spend its human and material resources on other things. For what its worth, I'd also like to see the ipad lineup simplified as well.
I agree... looks like there is no more Apple we know, excitement ends with old gear like MacBook 12, MacPro 2013, iMac 1998, and Mac Mini G4. Sad story, but true. Now it's just a marketing machine.Apple is no longer able to design miniaturised hardware because its software literally sucks: with limited batteries they can't handle the energy absorption because the software is now out of hand, and that's why there are no more 38mm Apple Watch, iPhone mini, MacBook, and the iPad mini is increasingly out of Apple's plans.
To make adequate miniaturised hardware you need competent designers and capable engineers, the first ones Apple made them all run away, the latter it never had.
Apple pulls the rope because at the moment there is still room for exploitation of batteries, when the problem of resources for batteries becomes predominant Apple will not be able to make up for, because the only resource he has is to design huge hardware with minimal batteries (they have a weight, a volume and above all a cost), in the hope that it will be able to reach the goal of 12 months, that is, when the new most scarce but most expensive hardware is ready to replace it, in a cycle that believes infinite.
I’m just gonna watch this from the gallery, very happy with my M1 MBA and see no reason to upgrade it in the next several years. Besides, don’t really think Gurman “knows” anything about Apples plans.
He's just guessing now. No different than our discussions.
exactly, that portability is something else... that weight + the energy efficiency of apple silicon = perfectionExactly this. The M2 MacBook Air beats the stuffing out of the old 12" MacBook on every count... until you carry it around for a few minutes and realize that somewhere in that extra 0.7 pounds and ~1", you lost the ability to forget that laptop is there until you need it, almost like a comfortably pocketed phone. I would pay a hefty premium over the MBA to get that magical feeling back.