Here's a fourth guess: OLED iPhone. The display would be small, 3.5", so the size limitation would not be an issue. Component pricing would seem to be the biggest setback, especially while maintaining the current pricing on the consumer side. Although, with such a small size and an order quantity of a few million, perhaps a reasonable price could have been reached.
Note that the product strings for the iPhone and iPod touch show 3,1 and 2,2. Maybe 3,1 will use OLED while 2,2 will use the regular displays.I just can't imagine OLED in laptops (large displays) for at least a couple more years. iPhone/iPods- soon. Maybe this will give apple something to put into the new line of iPods next fall, since they have pretty much maxed out the thinness, and capacities are already sufficient. We'll see. Anticipation!!
Seems likely to begin with the iPhone/Touch - over the top wonderful t'will be!If they do come out with an OLED iPhone that would simply be over the top wonderful.
Very likely.Really? I think it's likely in the next year or two.
hmm so what real world improvements could be see from such a technology being in the portable range??
power reductions?
sharper images
flexible screens?
clear screens??
what else is possible?
INCREDIBLE zombitronic
MacBook Pro Touch ? Kind of like zombitronics awesome mockups - but having a touchscreen - the ability to swivel the screen around 180, then fold so the back of the screen is over the keyboard, and it's folded into a tablet? ala
http://www.gigabyte.com.tw/Products/Notebook/Products_Spec.aspx?ProductID=2835 ?
Just to be clear, I didn't make the mockups, I just posted them. I don't want to take credit away from the guy who did them, because they are pretty incredible.
The swivel method is kind of cool, but I think the flexible screen is cooler. You still get a tablet form, but you can have it as a half-size tablet or a full-size tablet. The downside is that the screen is exposed, unlike the swivel method. From what I understand, OLEDs are pretty durable, though.
haha i thought not (no offense) - they look amazing though thanks for posting them do they improve res rates at all?? what about contrast ratios? hmmmm.. (wishes one was rich)
Resolution; not that I know of. They are very high res, but I haven't read about anything insane. Contrast ratios; absolutely. A black pixel is off so it's as black as the screen, itself. With no back light needed, there's nothing to illuminate the black part of the screen, leaving it darker.
Do OLED screens flicker? I think they do because in a video I saw of the optimus maximus the keys were filckering.
Doesn't OLED have low resolution ATM?
Doesn't OLED have low resolution ATM?
Thanks!Yes and no.
- OLED displays have typically little pixels that emit red/green/blue light themselves.
- So OLED displays generally do not need any backlight.
- And because pixels light up themselves (rather than like with LCDs where a backlight is blocked with a 'black' pixel) OLEDs do not suffer any light-bleed.
- As a result they have perfect contrast ratios as pixels switched off are truly black.
- Also black pixels hardly consume any power, so the darker the screen the less energy it uses, unlike LCDs where the backlight is always on so constantly uses the same amount of energy.
- Since there is no need for a backlight OLED displays are also very thin, typically around 1mm for the complete display, some as thin as 0.3mm!
- And finally because pixels light themselves the viewing angles are 180 degrees horizontally and vertically. There is no color shift at even extreme angles. Unlike the current 17" MBP which exhibits a rather extreme color shift IMHO with poor viewing angles.
However, you are right insofar as there are white colored OLEDs too, currently used for experimental lighting. Philips is hugely involved in those.
So it is conceivable to do a 'cheap' OLED by using a white OLED backlight with traditional LCD panel in front.
Yet this is not what is typically understood as 'OLED display', as an OLED/LCD setup loses most of the benefits, except perhaps thinness.