Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
WTF APPLE!!! i am planing on moving from pc to apple and was looking to buy a new laptop, so i was intrested in the 17" macbook pro and heard about the keynote so i held off and now to find that the 17" version has not been upgraded with the new graphics or anything :( very dissapointed ... might just get the 15" model then.

should I hold off or just buy the 15" ????

I've been a Mac user for 15+ years now....Currently using a 15" PB.... I use it as a desktop mostly with a 22" monitor attached, (I like screen real estate).
And I've been waiting for the 17" MBP refresh for months now... So, yes... a difficult decision... wait , or just buy the 15"????? (with the DVI adapter cable as well)

I do like the 17" Apple still has on their site... Now standard with 4GB memory, and a 320GB HD... sweet... ;) But I'd kick myself for not waiting a few months after the 17" gets it's makeover... decisions, decisions !!!!!:eek:
 
Maybe a stupid question, but for all of you guys that have the last gen. of 17" MB pros, couldnt you just change the screens out to make the new one have matte?
 
I've been eagerly waiting for a refreshed 1920x1200 17" since June, and - despite the sexiness of the unibody construction - I am appalled by the new MBP mandatory high gloss displays. I have to decide now whether to plonk down $3K on the current, end-of-cycle 17" with a faulty 8600M nVidia GPU (the primary reason why I did not buy one earlier in the year) with a nice, design-friendly matte screen, or to wait til 2009 for an odiously ultra-high-gloss 17" with less outdated specs and a more stable (hopefully) GPU.

I had hoped to purchase a new notebook before the end of the year, but in the absence of a psystar-style non-apple alternative to run OSX on, I appear to be stuck in a lose/lose situation.

Guess I have to check out the new 15s physically in a store to figure out whether the gloss is as horrific as it appears in online, and do more research on that 8600M to decide whether or not buying and old 17 is risk I can afford to live with. As a 'pro' user (graphic designer), I'm feeling extremely let down by apple right now.
 
I've been eagerly waiting for a refreshed 1920x1200 17" since June, and - despite the sexiness of the unibody construction - I am appalled by the new MBP mandatory high gloss displays. I have to decide now whether to plonk down $3K on the current, end-of-cycle 17" with a faulty 8600M nVidia GPU (the primary reason why I did not buy one earlier in the year) with a nice, design-friendly matte screen, or to wait til 2009 for an odiously ultra-high-gloss 17" with less outdated specs and a more stable (hopefully) GPU.

I had hoped to purchase a new notebook before the end of the year, but in the absence of a psystar-style non-apple alternative to run OSX on, I appear to be stuck in a lose/lose situation.

Guess I have to check out the new 15s physically in a store to figure out whether the gloss is as horrific as it appears in online, and do more research on that 8600M to decide whether or not buying and old 17 is risk I can afford to live with. As a 'pro' user (graphic designer), I'm feeling extremely let down by apple right now.

If you can wait for the new 17"
Or if you have the money, simply buy the new 15,4" and use a bigger matte monitor to work professionally
 
I've been eagerly waiting for a refreshed 1920x1200 17" since June, and - despite the sexiness of the unibody construction - I am appalled by the new MBP mandatory high gloss displays. I have to decide now whether to plonk down $3K on the current, end-of-cycle 17" with a faulty 8600M nVidia GPU (the primary reason why I did not buy one earlier in the year) with a nice, design-friendly matte screen, or to wait til 2009 for an odiously ultra-high-gloss 17" with less outdated specs and a more stable (hopefully) GPU.

I had hoped to purchase a new notebook before the end of the year, but in the absence of a psystar-style non-apple alternative to run OSX on, I appear to be stuck in a lose/lose situation.

Guess I have to check out the new 15s physically in a store to figure out whether the gloss is as horrific as it appears in online, and do more research on that 8600M to decide whether or not buying and old 17 is risk I can afford to live with. As a 'pro' user (graphic designer), I'm feeling extremely let down by apple right now.

I am pretty much the same position. But having tried out a few of the new models in the stores now, I'm no longer worried about the gloss (but then I'm not a graphic designer). The main sticking point is that if you really want 1920 x 1200, then 1440 x 900 is a very long way short. Indeed the hi-res screen has 78% more pixels.

For that reason I am most likely going to get the 17", 8600M notwithstanding.
 
K @ the people telling us complainers to "go in and check one out in the store and it wont be that bad."

I did, and yes its that bad. It looks the same as the iMac screens, which yes, everyone complained about when it was released and yes, Apple did not fix the problem. However they do offer the cinema displays, which solves the problem, in a sense, for a desktop user. Although it did cost atleast 600 more dollars to fix their problem. And yes, I can go and buy a cinema display right now to accompany my new shiny notebook but that doesnt solve the problem for people like me. I am a notebook user, not a desktop user, we are different. I am mobile. I do actual work in many different places, in the office, at home in the living room, in my home office, and i cant be lugging my cinema display with me everywhere i go. Not to mention when your out on the road anytime before 5pm its bright out and you cant see your screen as well as you could see a matte screen.

The truth is that glass can be made anti-glare with different kinds of blasting and yes, would probably cost a few more dollars to make, and I'll pay it, whatever, let me have the option to get what i want.

All the people who want choice in screens, leave feedback at http://www.apple.com/feedback/macbookpro.html and go into the store like i did today and complain. I went in pretty early today and they said that i wasn't the first one to whine about the glossy screens, and that most of employees there preferred the matte screen and hoped for its return.

Be as cynical as you want, if Apple gets enough complaints from many different avenues they may give us an option with the new 17" MBP in a few months.

Again the feedback page is:
http://www.apple.com/feedback/macbookpro.html
 
(And of course, they have to do it when I'm ridding myself of my Macs).

Fine, if you do not like Macs get rid of them all. Make your setup all PC if you want to (if dislike Macs that much).

Your name should be mosx#2 maybe instead. :p
 
They had what is probably the best design ever for laptops, other than easy access to the hard drive the old mac book pros were a perfect balance of form and function, sometimes things should just be left alone.
I was hoping for the same old and great design with better components, blue ray and 1920 x 1200 on the 15" in MATT maybe a couple of tweaks to the casing but not the lame rounded corners black plastic and a mirror. I think this design works for the macbook but not for the pro. I hope the new mbp's go the way of the cube...
 
I hope the new mbp's go the way of the cube...

They won't, because they are spectacular laptops.

There are always a few people that just don't like change. These new models and the design technology are going to be with Apple a long time. They have invested a lot of money into the milling plants and are proud of their achievement.

I doubt that they will change everything because a few people can't get past glossy displays.

Besides nearly every PC laptop vendor is using glossy displays as well, so if you don't buy Apple because of the display the PC version is no better for you.
 
Besides nearly every PC laptop vendor is using glossy displays as well, so if you don't buy Apple because of the display the PC version is no better for you.
today i have taken my 4 years old glossy screen sony vaio down to the apple store to compare the glare and the difference was just incredible. sony= almost no glare macbook pro= mirror!
i just dont understand apple engineers...
this cant be the future can it?

edit: here is a pic of the new glossy screen somebody else added on this forum
 
This might sound optimistic, but I think the 17" is gonna get a bigger overhaul than expected. The 1900 x 1200 is the only size screen that can allow editing in 1080 high def, so I doubt apple is dumb enough to phase out the 17 just yet. Also, I think quad core and possibly blu-ray are easy to see for the 17's full upgrade (hopefully in January). the 17's screen, again, is the only macbook big enough for blu-ray anyway, and quad core is perfect for the upgrade to snow leopard.

Again, optimistic, but so is matte making a comeback on the new mbs :(
 
today i have taken my 4 years old glossy screen sony vaio down to the apple store to compare the glare and the difference was just incredible. sony= almost no glare macbook pro= mirror!
i just dont understand apple engineers...
this cant be the future can it?

edit: here is a pic of the new glossy screen somebody else added on this forum

You notice in this picture that the screen image is nearly all black. Well of course the image is going to mirror in an all black image with a camera focused on the surface reflection.

Why didn't he take a photo of a bright white image with the display brightness turned up? Maybe because then you would not have seen a reflection at all.

I do understand everyones concern over not having a matte screen choice. But I don't see Apple changing this one, because they are using glass over the entire screen, surround, and isight camera. They would have to go back to pressed aluminum housing and strengthening brackets and bring back the aluminum bezel.
 
You notice in this picture that the screen image is nearly all black. Well of course the image is going to mirror in an all black image with a camera focused on the surface reflection.

Why didn't he take a photo of a bright white image with the display brightness turned up? Maybe because then you would not have seen a reflection at all.

I do understand everyones concern over not having a matte screen choice. But I don't see Apple changing this one, because they are using glass over the entire screen, surround, and isight camera. They would have to go back to pressed aluminum housing and strengthening brackets and bring back the aluminum bezel.

Please read this comment:
actually apple could use beadblasting to etch matte everywhere on the glass piece except the display window and really look great.
 
Please read this comment:

Yeah, I read it. But I am not sure that will work. How would it be to have a halo of smooth glass around a textured glass. Wouldn't the transition be strange.

Also will the matte texture screw up the screen display when it is raised above the actual lcd display by the thickness of the glass. Usually the matte coating is applied directly to the display.
 
today i have taken my 4 years old glossy screen sony vaio down to the apple store to compare the glare and the difference was just incredible. sony= almost no glare macbook pro= mirror!
i just dont understand apple engineers...
this cant be the future can it?

edit: here is a pic of the new glossy screen somebody else added on this forum
Haha, Sony's anti-glare glossy screens are unbeatable. :D Apple seems to use always the cheapest stuff. A new highend notebook with a nVidia chipset and a GeForce 9600... lol

Yeah, I read it. But I am not sure that will work. How would it be to have a halo of smooth glass around a textured glass. Wouldn't the transition be strange.

Also will the matte texture screw up the screen display when it is raised above the actual lcd display by the thickness of the glass. Usually the matte coating is applied directly to the display.

They don't need to use a matte textured glass, they could just use smooth anti-glare glass.
 
The new/unreleased 17" can't go the way of the cube because it's been evolving since the first Al Powerbooks. The cube was a one off product that never caught on. The PB/MBP 17" has been selling well for years.
 
Will Apple remove the FW800 port from the 17" version since they seem to going backwards here??? Just like deciding to exclude the FW400 from the Macbook which the previous version offered. There are still MANY Audio/Visual customers who rely on FW based products! :apple:

haha here's the kicker though: the $1000 White version still has Firewire 400. So there quote "crappy, budget, low-end model" has better connectivity than the fancy new ones. You obviously don't get a decent graphics option with the "old" model, but it's still funny that their least expensive laptop still has the (one of about two) things that sets the new MB and MBP apart.

Man, I think I still love my 1.5 y.o. MB even more now :D
 
What a joke, waited 6 months for update and it never happened. Just bought a OCZ Whitebook for $2600 (T9500, dual ATi 3870, 4gb RAM).
 
Not to derail, but does anyone here remember $10,000 IIfx' and $7900 IIci's? :eek:

I had both. In terms of Apple being noncompetitive in price, you could point to a more recent example - the G5 tower against the then-PC equivalents.

The tech is cheaper these days, but Apple is trying to get some R & D back on the new manufacturing process, hence the prices aren't "bargain basement" like most thought/expected.

There is no 'new manufacturing process'. True, Apple may be the only one doing it en masse specifically in the computer market, but there's a good reason for that to (not) be when considered from an engineering standpoint.

Apple doesn't cater to the bargain basement shopper, the days of the "Performa" are/were long over.

Perhaps you forget how much Performas used to cost in relation to other PC's - they weren't even bargain basement then, but at least they were still built solidly inside and out compared to the competition, unlike now perhaps - where it's just the outside that seems to count.

Fine, if you do not like Macs get rid of them all. Make your setup all PC if you want to (if dislike Macs that much).

Your name should be mosx#2 maybe instead. :p

As I said kabunaru, that's what I'm in the process of doing. I've pretty much had it with 'all form, little function'.

I don't know who mosx is, but my thought is that the less you know what you're actually doing, or at the more inanely nerd level the more hung up on tweaking the Apple OS you are, the more you'll appreciate the Apple way - and the comments I see on this board seem to strongly reinforce this.

These days I'm pretty much kicking myself daily that I wasted so much time and money - which is very likely more than the people participating in this thread have ever spent on Macs - since '05 on trying to make this work. With the benefit of hindsight, what we have now could have been achieved better with around a quarter of a million dollars' worth of kit and services under Windows / OSS, not more than triple that.

There are many elements of how Apple works that I like and I remained in two minds about this for a long time, but the practical upshot is that the solutions offered by Apple are just too compromised and ultimately ineffective for someone with my level of experience, capability and resources - even for casual at-home use in many circumstances.

I'll be glad to see the back of my XServes sometime in mid-2010, which will likely be the last of my "Macs" in regular use - although seeing as I've switched many people who I deemed too incapable to be trusted around Windows machines and they're very happy, I'll likely still need to keep one or two around to be able to help them out.
 
Core i7

By the time the new 17" MBPs release, Core i7 should be released...I wonder if this current delay will force Apple to forgo current processors for the Core i7?
 
What if the 17" ends here?

What a joke. You can't tell me Apple couldn't have released these yesterday.

And the wait continues...

If Apple really wanted to go against their we are only building smaller rather than better current frame of mind then a new 17" model would have come out. Apple is going low-end only now. It seems to be the reason that Steve Jobs reason for ending the Clones was because the Clones only wanted the higher end & skipped the low end. So does this make Steve Jobs filling in the area Apple wanted filled? Apple is filling in the low end, but we are not allowed to have Clones to fill in the lacking mid-range & high-end. Where are the new 17" & a 19"+ laptops? They are MIA.
 
17"???

I also hope that the Macbook Air gets the glass trackpad and the black boarder with the all glass to bring it in line with the rest of the computers.

We all know the 17" is coming, it's just a matter of when.

Do we know that the 17" is coming. It is like the 240 GB iPod Classic. It is too big under the current Stve Jobs & his current only smaller & lighter will be built. We'll hear that the 17" was too big & no one would purchase one. That they were too small a group for Apple to continue to sell one. When the current non-updated 17" models run out the 17" user can just go to the Apple refurbished market or to the much, much larger Windows market. Goodby so long after all you are the professional market & we are just a consumer electronics design & sales company. We do not have the time or the energy to waste on you any longer. That is the feeling that I have been getting from Apple of lately, actually years now, but much more so of lately.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.