For the record, I don't think Alabama ever deserved the #1 ranking. They had it because of their reputation, not because of talent. They were 12-0 with a schedule full of mostly mediocre teams.
Haha. Please.
EDIT:
My opinion is simple. To have a legitimate national champion, you need to let teams that have a legitimate claim to being the best in the land earn that distinction. This year, more than two teams had that claim and it's unfair to use some system no one likes to exclude those other teams. I'm not talking about just USC either. I am always critical of SLC but it's pure, unadulterated BS that Utah is not given an opportunity to show their mettle and play for a national championship. Same with Texas, same with USC. In a four team playoff, the winner is the last team standing and there would be little controversy. The only controversy would be who the 5th team that got left out was, but that's a hell of a lot better than what we have now.
Every sport has a playoff because it's important. As someone above me said, you don't just just let UNC play Duke every year for the NCAA championship because they're always ranked highly (let's just assume #1 and #2). A small play off is the best of both worlds: The regular season is hugely important as there would only be 4 or 8 spots to fill. Once those are filled, each team knows that they control their own destiny and the championship is theirs for the taking.
And therein lies the biggest part of the rub with the Utes as far as I'm concerned. You feel (and so do a lot of others after the sugar bowl ironically) that Alabama didn't belong. See the thing is, they did belong because they are in the SEC, the fact that they would have easily gone to the NC game this year combined with the fact that a lot of people are suddenly saying they didn't deserve to be in the NC picture pisses me off. So if Bama can get in when they "don't belong", Florida can get in with a loss to a then unranked opponent. Why can't Utah be even considered with an undefeated schedule and wins over a handful of top 25 (some of those top 15) teams. Now that we've beaten the team who was #1 for the biggest part of the season (though many are trying to diminish that by saying they didn't belong afterall) we should absolutely be given a shot.
If nothing else they should hold off on putting 2 teams in the NC game until all the BCS games have been played and look at records and schedules at that point. No doubt Utah would have to be in it if that were to happen. It would require 2 less BCS teams to get in though but I'm fine with that.
A playoff would still be better though!
SLC
A poll for Badandy (I kid)
I do find it funny, though, that California didn't vote overwhelmingly in favor of USC.
P-Worm
Of course not. We beat all of the other teams in California so often and are so cocky about it they hate us.![]()
Wow... you mean because alabama was ranked in the top 25 before the season.. then they beat teams with rankings. Medicore? Please define? Wow.... Sorry there reputation hasn't been good the past 7 years thank you very much, if not longer.
my top4 for a playoff would be:
1. florida
2. texas
3. oklahoma
4. utah
id have 5, to include usc and have the #1 bcs team get a bye
Bah! Stop this playoff talk! There's a GAME on tonight. Texas. Ohio State. Hell YES!
I shall drink one Shiner Bock every time either team scores (TD, FG, or Safety).
Hook'em!!!!![]()
![]()
None of the other games matter. The champion already played, Friday night in the Sugar Bowl.
None of the other games matter. The champion already played, Friday night in the Sugar Bowl.
SLC
that wouldn't work... #5 v #2, #4 v #3. then you have three teams left. #1 team gets two bye weeks?
8 team playoff is the best. you'll get at least 1/2 mid majors amongst the "big boys"
back to football though
i think i posted this but i forget. anyways i think a good compromise would be to use the bcs as we have it today to seed the top 6 teams for a playoff. have the 1 and 2 teams have a bye for first game
the reason i say 6 is so the bcs can use the same bcs bowls (5 of them)
so have say the 4 bcs bowls be of the following (the would rotate like they do now for both the round games as well as championship game)
Round one
6 vs 3: Rose
5 vs 4: Fiesta
Round 2
1 vs Fiesta champion aka 5vs4 game: Sugar
2 vs Rose champion aka 6vs3 game: Orange
Championship
the finalists of the round 2 games
i think that is a fair compromise with current system as really, 6 teams MAX have a legitiate claim to being the best team. usually far less most years
i dunno thats my opinion at least lol
your utah team is terrible. you play in a terrible conference against terrible teams. do you really want to go to a good bowl game and get embarrassed like hawaii did last year?
If you think your team could compete with bama, florida, texas tech, psu, osu, oklahoma, etc. you are out of your mind.
haha i still stand by the bad conference part.
and i wish bama woulda came ready to play and their all american o-line guy didn't get suspended for the game
Bah! Stop this playoff talk! There's a GAME on tonight. Texas. Ohio State. Hell YES!
I'm with you... hook'em horns!
Woof, Woof - Dawg![]()
Hook'em Horns! HA! You're funny! Just wait until the Buckeyes stomp all over the longhorns!!! GO BUCKS!![]()