Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Status
Not open for further replies.
Yeah, I agree completely. Playing for a team in the bottom half in the Premier League means learning to make the most of possession when you get it. I hope Hull Cit stay up and keep him. I think he could be an asset to the club and an asset to the national team. He scored against Spain, you know. ;)

EDIT:
Chelsea simply outplayed Arsenal. The Gunners are increasingly looking like a very talented but clearly flawed side - the only reason they are doing as good as they are is that they have quite a few pure quality players, but the team as a whole is not effective right now.

Normally I'd like to see Arsenal beat Chelsea but this win does open more of a gap between Man U and the title so I'll take that as a positive... :eek:

The big four are really strung out this season: Chelsea is essentially unchanged, United is noticeably worse, Arsenal and especially Liverpool are in danger of losing Champions League football.
 
And as a bonus, a certain young American found the net too for his first Premier League goal. :cool:

Has Fagan mistaken Altidore for Ferdinand?
 

Attachments

  • attachment-1.jpg
    attachment-1.jpg
    88.7 KB · Views: 55
The Gunners are increasingly looking like a very talented but clearly flawed side - the only reason they are doing as good as they are is that they have quite a few pure quality players, but the team as a whole is not effective right now.
Right now? When did they last look effective against the top two? When did they last win a trophy? They may play some lovely football, but they just can't win the big games.
 
Right now? When did they last look effective against the top two? When did they last win a trophy? They may play some lovely football, but they just can't win the big games.

True. Oddly enough, Liverpool has had more success than Arsenal in the last couple years in top four derbies. I am so pumped that we've beaten Man U three out of the last three. Probably the only highlight of this season for us.
 
I think Arsenal might win some more games if they took a shot or two. As much as I love to watch a team who score perfect goals, Arsenal simply don't score them often enough. RVP's injury has proved very costly indeed. That said, putting all your faith in one striker who has a proven record of injuries was not the smartest idea from Wenger. They dearly need(ed) another proven goalscorer. Arshavin is not a striker (although he is a super player), Bendtner is a pretty limited footballer (IMO), and Eduardo hasn't been on it since his injury.

Big night this evening. Live on Sky sports.... The Essex derby! Colchester vs (dirty) Southend. Our pitch is an absolute disgrace, so it looks like it'll be 'direct' football from us! Aidy Boothroyd is our manager and we have two big guys up front, so that will hardly be a surprise. I'm sure it'll be a feast of football, think Brasil '82.

I haven't got a telly, so I'll just have to spend the evening in my local. It's a 10 second walk so I don't mind too much... :D
 
I think Arsenal might win some more games if they took a shot or two. As much as I love to watch a team who score perfect goals, Arsenal simply don't score them often enough. RVP's injury has proved very costly indeed. That said, putting all your faith in one striker who has a proven record of injuries was not the smartest idea from Wenger. They dearly need(ed) another proven goalscorer. Arshavin is not a striker (although he is a super player), Bendtner is a pretty limited footballer (IMO), and Eduardo hasn't been on it since his injury.
While I agree, Arsenal have scored the same amount of goals as Chelsea in the PL this season, and only 1 less than Man U. Go figure :)
 
Everton 1-6 Arsenal, Arsenal 4-1 Pompey, Arsenal 4-0 Wigan, Arsenal 6-2 Blackburn...

But against the 'good' teams, not so pretty...
 
Arsenal scores a lot of goals, but if RVP was healthy they'd be scoring a lot more. Many of the pundits complain that they don't shoot often enough. I don't know if that's true or not - but I think their biggest weakness is still defense. They need to be better at shutting down the opposition.

Arsneal haven't won anything in several years, yet the supporters are still behind Wenger. I think that's the right attitude to have. If they sacked him they'd be very hard put to find a replacement of equal quality.

In MLS news, the new season's schedule is out and for first time every team will play every other team home and away. It's about freaking time! The collective bargaining agreement negotiations are still ongoing, I expect they will continue up to the 11th hour....

No word on when ex-Houston midfielder Stuart Holden will make a match appearance for Bolton. He's certainly not going to slot in with the ease Donovan has, but I hope to see him get playing time ahead of the World Cup.
 
I was going to lambast capoeirista for the state of Colchester's pitch, but it's actually helped give them the lead – the Southend players slipping on the sandy surface to let an eminently clearable shot (if it can be called that) trickle in.

plaj futbolu.jpg

Heh. High comedy at the Weston Homes Community Stadium. :p
 
That photo reminds me of the beach soccer world championships that were on last summer...it had been raining before that match I saw and the middle 2/3 of the pitch (the whole thing is only maybe 40 yards long?) was under water..it was the most boring football match I've ever seen, the water made it impossible to pass, so it was just a succession of long range shots over and over and over until someone put one in.
 
Wirelessly posted (Mozilla/5.0 (iPhone; U; CPU iPhone OS 3_1_3 like Mac OS X; en-us) AppleWebKit/528.18 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/4.0 Mobile/7E18 Safari/528.16)

I'm in a next to empty pub, and am the only person watching on the big screen. What an awful awful match and exactly as I predicted above, get it bang it long, but at least we're wining (just).

As for the pitch... Well I wholeheartedly agree. Dreadful. However the groundsman is top notch. I'm pretty sure he won groundsman of the year whilst back in out old stadium (the pitch was great, I should know, I used to fill in the divots at half time many years ago). What I heard this year and in the new stadium, is that during it's construction the undersoil got super compacted by the diggers etc and what with the position if the place and the weather we've had over the past month or two... Well it's a total disaster. We could do with a month or two of dry weather and no football... Oh wait it's February. :(
 
I have seen some truly truly terrible matches featuring Colchester United. Anyone who's followed their team in the GM Vauxhall Conference would understand.

Today however, despite the awful pitch, the misplaced passes, the long range shots going out for a throw in, players falling over etc. was an amazing game.

ONE TEAM IN ESSEX!! THERE'S ONLY ONE TEAM IN EEEEEESSSEEEEX!!!

Plus I saw my Mum (who, along with my Dad stewards at the games) on Sky Sports standing in shot behind a very disgruntled Steve "Like I say" Tilson.

Magic. Time bed.
 
Chelsea didn't simply outplay Arsenal, and I would've thought that was evident to anyone who watched the game. We competed, and played well, but had two problem. Firstly, we lacked a cutting edge, and secondly and more importantly, we had some terrible defensive mistakes. It doesn't matter how well you play, if you make defensive mistakes so stupidly, you can't win anything. Clichy left his post, letting Drogba score, and Clichy left Drogba alone on his left side on the break for the second. Simple really. We make those terrible mistakes, we lose. If we cut them out, then we are in a very competitive game, and in midfield and upfront we were not outplayed - we played well. Just stupid defensive mistakes. Clichy is terrible at the moment, and Almunia is just as bad. There lies the problem. With United the performance was bad. With Chelsea it was fine, just individual, isolated shocking defending.
 
I partially agree. But as a whole, I would still say that Chelsea outplayed Arsenal. In terms of holding possession and moving the ball around, Arsenal were more or less as good as they always have been. They were very adept at building attacks from the midfield and pushing forward. They pushed out wide and got behind the fullbacks.

But once they got to the 18 yard box it seemed like they ran out of ideas. Arsenal have nobody who can get their head on a cross like (and this will surely make you cringe) a Peter Crouch or Tim Cahill. So when crosses come in there's little chance you'll beat the Chelsea back line, who are all pretty strapping boys. I know, I know, the pundits are saying the same thing....but I do feel like Arsenal are missing something in the final third, someone to be a physical presence up front.

Don't get me wrong - I don't think Arsenal were dominated. But I think Chelsea's game plan worked better for them. They seemed very effective at blunting Arsenal's attack and Drogba burned Clichy almost every time he faced him. Arsenal had a couple of chances that could easily have been goals, so it's not like they didn't threaten.
 
Wow, no THAT's fandom. Fixed divots on the pitch years ago, parents are stewards....

I doff my cap to you capoeirista. ;)


Heh heh. Thanks. I've just reread my posts from last night. Damn you Guinness/iPhone auto correct!!:)

I'm off now to listen to Man City 3 Bolton 1.
 
Hmm... Arsenal. where to begin? Well, obviously I'm going to have to be careful what I say, lest XIII duff me up when he comes up here next month. :p

As the baker's dozen-monikered one mentions, defensive mistakes have once again proved costly for the Gunners. I know I've said this before, so I apologise in advance for sounding like a stuck record, but defensively Arsenal look very naive at times and this, combined with a set of less than impressive 'keepers who are clearly lacking in confidence, means that you just can't see them keeping a clean sheet in games against the likes of Chelsea or Manchester United. The full backs in particular seem to be struggling (Clichy especially was appalling against Chelsea), perhaps they're getting a bit too far forward a bit too often and are leaving gaps at the back that the likes of Drogba are all too able to exploit. I don't know.

Much has been said and written about the lack of a proven and potent striker – as I've said before though, I don't think that it's so much the goalscoring that's the problem (Arsenal have 60 goals in 25 league games, a fine return), but if they can get a capable forward in then that's so much the better. But Wenger has failed to do that this January, he's failed to strengthen defensively too beyond the addition of Sol Campbell.

Now, we all know he's not keen on throwing money around – quite the opposite, he's often mentioned the need to be prudent and sensible when it comes to transfers, and in all fairness he makes a good point. Spending huge sums of money is no guarantee of success as teams such as Liverpool prove, and although Arsenal are in debt their owings do at least seem to be manageable. But I'm not saying that he has to make a lot of big signings – a few sensibly acquired players to add ability and experience to the side are what's needed, and could have made all the difference.

Arsenal have the scouting network, the contacts, the reputation and the finances to attract quality players – and given that the team's shortcomings have been evident for a long period of time there's no real excuse for not addressing them. Look at the striker situation as an example. Robin van Persie was injured in mid-November and – wranglings with Dutch doctors not withstanding – it was clear that he was going to be out for a reasonable period of time. That gave Arsenal two-and-a-half months to identify, scout and acquire a replacement – but no signing was made. Yes, Marouane Chamakh is apparently interested in moving to the Emirates on a free transfer when his deal at Bordeaux expires in the summer, but that's not really addressing the current issue is it?

If buying is a problem for whatever reason, we're in a World Cup year – there are players across Europe who aren't playing as often as they'd like but who want matches under their belt to stake a claim for a place in their national teams. Couldn't one or two of them be brought in on loan at least as a short term measure?

Just a short time ago, everything was looking very rosy for the Gunners. But now they're out of the FA Cup (a competition that with Manchester United and Liverpool out you'd say they'd have been well placed to win) and have fallen off the pace in the Premier League. Yes, they're still in the Champions League but if Manchester United and Chelsea can dissect them so efficiently then Europe's elite clubs will be fancying their chances against them too.

Wenger has indicated in recent days that he feels a third-placed finish is a grander achievement than winning most trophies. If that's honestly what he thinks, then that's his opinion and he's perfectly entitled to it of course. But if I were an Arsenal fan I think I might be feeling a little frustrated that a season that seemed so full of promise looks like it may end with a whimper, especially if it's due to clearly identifiable problems that there's apparently been little effort to address.

Anyway, those are my thoughts from a neutral's standpoint. Naturally, I don't know the team or players as well as some here, but it just seems to me that the same old problems keep coming back to cost Arsenal dearly. Whatever we all think, one thing's for certain – with both teams needing a good result, tomorrow's match against Liverpool could be very interesting indeed...
 
...with both teams needing a good result, tomorrow's match against Liverpool could be very interesting indeed...

Arsenal should beat us, but Liverpool can perform on the day, especially of late. It could be a very interesting match...or a dull one. How's that for analysis? :D
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.