Okay, I think you're being way, way too negative about this trade. What do injuries to previous Clippers' players have to do with anything? That's not any kind of indicator that knee injuries will happen to Chris Paul, they don't correlate at all. Unless you're insinuating their home court causes them, which is ridiculous.
Clippers fans have something to be excited about. No offense, but it sounds like sour grapes to me.
Actually it's not sour grapes. The Clippers have to win a few championships before I'll actually consider them to be legitimate rivals to the Lakers. I'm not particularly concerned about that. And even if I were, at least there would finally be a local rivalry to be interested in.
No, my skepticism is based on 25 years of seeing the Clippers screw up every good move they've ever made. Until Blake Griffin arrived, there wasn't much to be excited about. I like Griffin a lot and I want him to do well. I hope Paul does well too because he's a talented, hard-working player who's fun to watch. But there have been several Clipper teams that got some people excited, like this might be the year when they really do something, and then it doesn't happen. You'll excuse me if I don't believe it until I see it.
How about a short list of injuries that ruined the careers of the Clippers' best player at the time. None of these players were ever the same afterward and were never productive for the Clippers again:
Bill Walton - bad feet
Norm Nixon - blows out his knee
Marques Johnson - neck injury
Danny Manning - blows out his knee
Ron Harper - blows out his knee
Loy Vaught - back injury
Elton Brand - ruptured Achilles tendon
Shaun Livingston - every ligament in his knee. Do yourself a favor and don't do a Youtube search for this one.
These are just the injuries, the bad luck events that are possibly made worse by the training staff of a cheapskate owner, but probably not. I could provide a much longer list of terrible trades, dumb draft picks, and repulsive Donald Sterling stories if you'd like.
Again, I'm NOT saying that I don't want Paul to succeed. I'm saying that all of this sudden optimism about the Clippers is delusional. Let's maybe see how the season goes first? See if they make the second round of the playoffs for the second time ever? How about we try that?
And "as a Laker fan", I'm actually more annoyed that the David Stern decided to circumvent the CBA that was signed less than 48 hours before he rejected the Paul/Lakers trade than anything else. They couldn't create rules preventing wealthy teams from getting top players, so Stern just arbitrarily did it himself. It makes the whole NBA look very bush-league.
From a basketball perspective, I'm not sure the Paul trade would have improved the Lakers. He already has knee issues. It's unclear how well he would have co-existed with Kobe, who has never played with a star point guard. The Lakers are switching to a new offensive system with a new coaching staff. It's going to be a fluky, chaotic season because of the compressed schedule and lack of training camp. Every team is just going to muddle through to make the playoffs and hope everything comes together by then.
The only Lakers' move that annoys me is the Odom giveaway. And even that doesn't outrage me because I knew that with the more punitive luxury tax of the new CBA, the Lakers were going to have reduce payroll over the next couple years in some way. But the Lakers' highest priority needs to be staying in contention while Kobe is still productive. I think he has three more seasons at the most. After that they can blow the team up and start over, but until then they need to surround him with as many pieces as possible to contend. Since it doesn't look like they will acquire Howard either, it now appears that they gave away Odom for practically nothing. Maybe they have a plan that will work out, but for the first time in a few years, I'm not optimistic about their chances.