Sidebar Sidebar
Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

2011 Mba Owners, share your ssd model and display model here

This is what System profiler says:
APPLE SSD TS128C:

Capacity: 121,33 GB (121.332.826.112 Byte)
Modell: APPLE SSD TS128C
Version: CJAA0201
 
bp1000 said:
The thing is nobody has proved that 1 is better than the other.
Click to expand...

Hence "if" :p. I don't really care, honestly. I highly doubt I would notice any difference. I am certainly far too lazy to return a computer to try my hand at a parts lottery :p
 
For the SSD discussion:

The easiest way to prove that Samsungs are better than Toshibas is
to post some benchmarks. So instead of just posting what you've got run the
harddrive test in XBench 1.3 and post your results.

I'll give it a go with my toshiba in a few hours when i'll get more time.
 
ApplePu said:
For the SSD discussion:

The easiest way to prove that Samsungs are better than Toshibas is
to post some benchmarks. So instead of just posting what you've got run the
harddrive test in XBench 1.3 and post your results.

I'll give it a go with my toshiba in a few hours when i'll get more time.
Click to expand...

Well, it has already been proven many times, so it's a fact, the Samsung SSD is faster.:)
 
I ran bench on my tosh ssd

Write: 228.90MB/Sec [4K blocks]
Read: 201.66MB/Sec [256K blocks]


Thought read was mean't to be faster than write but seems fairly quick
 
bp1000 said:
People have claimed the samsung benches faster but i haven't seen any results myself yet. The concept was started by a few people here but i haven't seen any evidence yet.

I really truly don't think there is going to be much different between the SSD's or the panels, minor differences maybe, not major ones.
Click to expand...

I have no idea which panel is better and I don't think there is any hard proof for it.

About the SSDs: the Samsung is clearly the faster one. Anandtech shows it very clearly. Benchmarks on Storagereview and Laptopmag indicate the same.

But I do agree that it may be hard to perceive the performance difference in real life (without using benchmark software).
 
Kehletten said:
Well, it has already been proven many times, so it's a fact, the Samsung SSD is faster.:)
Click to expand...

well i've not seen any proof black on white. especially not for the 256gb models. it could be a whole different story. and why trust some reviewers when we can test it on our own in the machines we care about? so instead of just speculating and complaining we can proof where the differences are and then everyone can decide for his own good if he wants to swap out his air until he gets the desired parts.
 
So can we start posting benches with xbench, i posted my results above from my toshiba ssd.

Will be more interesting to compare real performance.
 
Here's the Xbench for the Toshiba 128gb SSD

ts128c.png
 
I'm not sure how to get the display info but I have the base 13 and the ssd is the SM128C.
 
OMG!

I just discovered I have a panel manufactured by Mars, Inc., in a factory that processes nuts, (Snickers). Should I be concerned?!

My Panel Serial # is:

MMMM229282YUMMY201CHCLAT22
 
Apple II said:
13" i7/256

LTH133BT01A03
SM256C

I have hit the lottery, yes?
Click to expand...

If you have to ask the internet, then you've proved this is ridiculous. It should be very obvious if your components are 'superior.'

There are no differences in components. Period.
 
bp1000 said:
I ran bench on my tosh ssd

Write: 228.90MB/Sec [4K blocks]
Read: 201.66MB/Sec [256K blocks]


Thought read was mean't to be faster than write but seems fairly quick
Click to expand...

U have the 64gb right? I am wondering if the 64gb vs 128gb vs 256gb are all the same speed when tested.?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.
Top Bottom
Back