U have the 64gb right? I am wondering if the 64gb vs 128gb vs 256gb are all the same speed when tested.?
U have the 64gb right? I am wondering if the 64gb vs 128gb vs 256gb are all the same speed when tested.?
Why, because someone on teh interwebz says so?If you have to ask the internet, then you've proved this is ridiculous. It should be very obvious if your components are 'superior.'
There are no differences in components. Period.
Let me just interject into this thread:
The SSD speed is completely moot IMO - like anyone will ever notice a 20% or even 40% benchmark difference IRL
BTW run those benchmarks a couple of times and look how huge the variability is (it is on my 160GB Intel X25 G2). Now, the actual thing to discuss is the display.
Anyone have a calibration setup to be able to talk about the brightness, eveness and gamut or are we just gonna have 3rd rate accounts of people that went to an Apple store?
I know there are some reviews on the MBA13 2010 (Anandtech, notebookreview) that have some real measurements, but it's not clear which screens they got in theirs.
With regards to the display i have clipping on the red and green channels which in digital photography are the easiest colour channels to clip. The LG clearly over saturates and thus has problems with the highlight colour channels.
However, after calibration i'm pleased with the improvements. Photos look superb, lovely contrast, sharpness and colour replication, better than many monitors i have used. So in the real world, i really don't see the problem.
Again we are just benchmarking without any consideration of real world use and guessing and assuming.
If you have to ask the internet, then you've proved this is ridiculous. It should be very obvious if your components are 'superior.'
There are no differences in components. Period.
Ended up switching my 11" MBA for a 13" MBA..
Got Samsung SSD but a LG Monitor. Oh well, I don't notice the difference anyways.
Here's the 128GB Samsung bench mark, i had 10+ apps open though since I was installing stuff while doing this benchmark. I'm impressed.![]()
What SSD/Display did you have before?
After seeing those Benchmarks the Samsung isn't dramatically better
Keep in mind, the one's posted of Toshiba was 256GB and mine was only 128GB. There could be a difference because the more space you have on SSDs, the faster they usually are (at least sand force controllers acted like that)
additionally, my tosh wasn't busy with other tasks during benchmarking...
would really like to see a benchmark of the 256gb model, lazy folks![]()
Honestly though, the difference is like maybe a half a second MAX. Real world vs Bench Mark I would not be worried. My Windows Development PC has a Intel 510 SSD and I only noticed a small speed boost when upgrading from an Intel X-25M. And the bench marks had the 510 winning by a lot more.
additionally, my tosh wasn't busy with other tasks during benchmarking...
would really like to see a benchmark of the 256gb model, lazy folks![]()