Anyone considering the midrange or top-of-the-line Mac mini should take a careful look at the 21.5" iMac, middle of the line.
You get:
2.7GHz Quad-core Intel Core i5, Turbo Boost up to 3.2GHz
8GB 1600MHz DDR3 SDRAM - 2X4GB
1TB Fusion Drive
Intel Iris Pro Graphics
PLUS:
1920 x 1080 Display
Apple Magic Mouse
Apple Wireless Keyboard (English) & User's Guide
for $1,499 !
With the same ports, same WiFi.
The top Mac mini with a similar Dual-core config is $999 with a
Fusion drive too. And you will end up with more desk space, since the
system is tucked behind the iMac display.
The mini makes little sense anymore.
Unless you want a server Mac to go on a shelf with a bunch of other Macs.
I believe Apple is designing around Intel's CPU lines, and Intel isn't providing
processors that Apple can put into the mini at appropriate prices.
There is a reason there is exactly $500 difference between the two
machines.
Except what if I want those specs without the built-in monitor. The iMac is a nice machine -- I have one at home. But what if I don't want the included display? What if I want two identical 24" displays? What if I want to replace/upgrade the display before I upgrade the machine?
For some people, the iMac is a fine solution. But for me, I already have a 27" Apple Thunderbolt display and no room really for a second display (i.e., the iMac itself). In this situation, an $800 headless Mac is the solution I need.
While I'll probably replace my 2011 2.5GHz core i5 Mac mini with a new one, I'm seriously debating picking up a 2012 quad core off eBay instead. Either one will be a nice speed bump compared to what I have presently. Trouble is, I need 16GB since I frequently use a Windows VM along with other Mac apps.