I don't think you ever win a championship via luck. That roster was pretty brilliantly constructed. I get your frustration about Lester, but the luck argument is pretty lame.
ever?
OMG, tell that to the Giants.
Yes, most teams get there through hard work and often being the best and having them from the start as the Yankees can attest to with so many championships.
On paper and during regular season there's nothing indicating that the Giants should even make it to postseason thus the poor showing at beginning of year with oddsmakers. Yes, in most cases a great team is brilliantly constructed, but does that mean having other team castoffs suddenly turn hot in October, or having mediocre or over the hill players step up, or having backups do the work when very key people are hurt? Who can predict that, and who would? Only people who knew absolutely nothing about baseball thought SF would get there simply because they
were great. No, there weren't great as the ERAs and batting averages of the entire year showed, but they somehow
played great together as a team and there's a big difference there.
I don't know if the emotional events of the marathon bombing or shedding the curse only ten years ago are factors to the success of Boston, but some teams have similar things happen that could be seen as devastating and that can drive them. Don't you think Hurricane Katrina and the way New Orleans had to band together put a certain spirit to home games during the Saints run to the Lombardi?
Over here for many years, Barry Bonds was almost everything for San Francisco but the team went on without him in 2009 leading into the big 2010 year. Many thought it was over for SF to get anywhere without Bonds who was key for the team getting to the 2002 WS. Other big years for SF recently were made without key stars (no Lincecum in WS rotation, and no Lincecum, Cain, or Zito in most recent WS rotation as well as being without big stars Scutaro and Pagan). Luck played a huge factor as the team made the biggest opportunities possible from the smallest errors of other teams who had their full cast of starters with better batting averages and lower ERAs. I think your 2013 Boston year was a miracle, not unlike SF's 2012 or 2014 and the usual suspects of teams most expected (LAD, Rangers, Reds, LAA, Washington, and Cardinals) didn't win the WS.
Sometimes the first thing people want to do is heap a lot of credit on Bruce Boche or consider him some sort of genius doing something different than other skippers. He will be the first to tell you how puzzled how well things turn out, especially in situations where the team is facing elimination. Through 2012 NLDS, NLCS, and 2014 Wild Card Game, the team faced 7 elimination games but won each of those 7.
That being said with your acquisition of the Panda and a big hitter from LAD, the Red Sox should be in pretty good contention. As long as you keep Panda from getting too fat (problem we had sometimes with him in SF), you should get a few extra games next year from him. Ramirez should also be worth a few extra games, too. If you go all the way, it will be because you spent well and did so with your crew of 2013 who should take their experience and have a nice addition of a couple of west coast guys. If you got Lester I would predict you go 100+ games.