"Phone" is nowhere near the top 25 things you do with that device, so I'd rather see them make a clean break.How about Apple Phone?
"Phone" is nowhere near the top 25 things you do with that device, so I'd rather see them make a clean break.How about Apple Phone?
This year's Haptic button isnt going to stick around. Early reports say it's an odd duck. It'll get replaced next year by a better solution.We'll think again honey! Because this years home button is exactly a real one. It looks like one. They secretly covered it up. It'll be a shocker !!
You might be on the wrong site, this is macRUMORS.
But if they have courage, it will happen next year.
[doublepost=1473814733][/doublepost]
But the design flaws aren't really design flaws.
It does seem like iPhone 7 is merely a placeholder. It's getting decent reviews... every new iPhone does, but next year's Anniversary Model is bound to be far better. It'll be easy to wait and pass on the 7.There's going to be a lot of people who can't afford a new phone every year who are already regretting buying the iPhone 7 before they've even bought it!
not if they sell it for 5000Ceramic? The ceramic for the Watch takes a long time, if Apple's marketing materials are to be believed (they say it takes days to make the case). If true, that's unworkable for iPhones at this time.
Graphene you say? Tell more, the benefits, pros and cons!
Sure they arent. Pure coincidence they eliminated the slate black color on the 5s, went for a stronger aluminum on the 6s and made 4 antenna strips on the 4S.
Sure, but the new model is basically an iPhone 6s minus the aux. It's biggest improvement is basically the A10. Other than that, nothing amazing, and I personally think it's not worthy of being called an iPhone 7.Can we have some time to actually use the yet to be released model before the speculation about the next model begins?
Wow that means no bezels at all. I doubt it a bit though because as much as I rail against bezels, we still need some minimal bezels at the top/bottom.
I wonder if it is radio transparent also and would allow for uninterrupted wireless communications through the device.Wikipedia:
Graphene has many extraordinary properties. It is about 100 times stronger than the strongest steel. It conducts heat and electricity efficiently and is nearly transparent.[3] Graphene also shows a large and nonlinear diamagnetism,[4] even greater than graphite, and can be levitated by Nd-Fe-B magnets. Researchers have identified the bipolar transistor effect, ballistic transport of charges and large quantum oscillations in the material.
Scientists have theorized about graphene for decades. It has likely been unknowingly produced in small quantities for centuries, through the use of pencils and other similar applications of graphite. It was originally observed in electron microscopes in 1962, but only studied while supported on metal surfaces.[5] The material was later rediscovered, isolated and characterized in 2004 by Andre Geim and Konstantin Novoselov at the University of Manchester.[6][7] Research was informed by existing theoretical descriptions of its composition, structure and properties.[8] High-quality graphene proved to be surprisingly easy to isolate, making more research possible. This work resulted in the two winning the Nobel Prize in Physics in 2010 "for groundbreaking experiments regarding the two-dimensional material graphene."
I saw first things of this made for high end racing bikes which looked very promising and might change the whole race bike industry to move from carbon to graphene. Bikes could be manufactured weighting no more then 3Kg still stronger than ever. The most common problem with carbon racing wheels is heat dispersion, carbon is not able to do this like steel and aluminium; graphene seems to solve this issue while being lighter and stronger than carbon, steel or aluminium. The future looks bright!
So where does the front-facing camera and speaker for phone calls go exactly?
They need to put the front camera as long as the earpiece so a minimum bezel is necessary at least on the top.
I'd say a bezel half the size of current one could be enough and since they like symmetry we can expect the same bezel on both sides. I'd be happy with that, even half of current bezel size would be a huge step forward. Can't wait to see next year's model!