Your refutation doesn’t really imply anything to my post and lacks substance. Let’s break this down:
It’s common knowledge, the ceramic is _not_ nearly as popular due to the exorbitant price point as the aluminum would be, simply because consumers aren’t willing to spend that much on a casing material, So put yourself in the minority of a demographic that actually would spend _that_ much on a smart watch with the ceramic, when most retailers wouldn’t even carry that specific model in their store, let alone the stainless, simply because of the popular/cheapest model, which would be the aluminum. Rather you choosing to not purchase a Series 4 because it doesn’t offer ceramic, that’s your prerogative, but it doesn’t change the fact that consumers are attracted to that specific casing, when they don’t care about that or even understand the direct advantages, especially when all the Apple Watch models are operating the same watchOS.
[doublepost=1550503585][/doublepost]
The Hermès models are more exclusive, so you would likely have a higher resale value due to just the branding, the caveat being it would have to likely be sold online versus locally to achieve the the most amount of profit. Most consumers when opting for an Apple Watch used, probably would just opt for the aluminum if anything or they are not aware what the advantage would be to the Hermès model, but Hermes watches if you search eBay, that’s a decent value, and seem to sell rather quicker, because of a broader audience that’s looking for that _specific_ watch. My older stainless watch was kind of in a similar situation, where it sold instantly versus it took much longer locally.
