Snow Queen loveWhat the heck is a white heart?
[doublepost=1527864082][/doublepost]Seems like toilet roll and leg emoji will be useful.
Snow Queen loveWhat the heck is a white heart?
STILL no :eyeroll:
Please explain why you’re pointing the finger at Apple. Emojis are adopted by the Unicode Consortium, of which Apple is just one member. I’m not hearing anyone say the Oracle is too preoccupied with emojis. Maybe more blame should rest with, oh, Emojipedia, which is a full voting member. Or Huawei, who’s so interested in them that they copied Apple’s animoji. Not the kind of comment I’d expect from a moderator.Apple seems too preoccupied with emojis
Well done!But where are the Macs? Fire Tim Cook! So glad this is what Apple has been spending their resources on. How about fixing the bugs first? Apple has lost its way. Only morons use emojis. Watch bands!
That should cover all the bases.
That gun emoji debacle had to be the dumbest thing of all time.Oops, better nerf that axe before somebody (or their feelings) gets hurt!
This isn't about something coming out or someone getting something, this is just what's being proposed/discussed for the next Unicode standard update.OH BOY!!!! YES!!! FINALLY NEW EMOJI. It feels like it's been at LEAST a few months since I got some new ones!!!!11!!11!!1!!!1
It’s amazing how fast a year goes by... faster and faster the older I get!OH BOY!!!! YES!!! FINALLY NEW EMOJI. It feels like it's been at LEAST a few months since I got some new ones!!!!11!!11!!1!!!1
You're implying we won't see these emojis. Come on man, of course we will.This isn't about something coming out or someone getting something, this is just what's being proposed/discussed for the next Unicode standard update.
YEAH MAN!@@@!!! They're really pumping these out!!!11!!It’s amazing how fast a year goes by... faster and faster the older I get!
I’ve disabled the emoji keyboard on my iPhone.
Has anyone else?
I wasn't implying anything about that, just saying it's not what this article is about (and speaking of actually seeing these, it won't be anything even close to a couple of months before any of these emojis might even make an appearance, given that it would still be sometime into 2019 before any of them are even approved to be part of the Unicode standard).You're implying we won't see these emojis. Come on man, of course we will.
[doublepost=1527879768][/doublepost]
YEAH MAN!@@@!!! They're really pumping these out!!!11!!
Yup, every June the Unicode consortium adds new emoji, and in September Apple becomes compliant with the standard.YEAH MAN!@@@!!! They're really pumping these out!!!11!!
Apple is the 800 lb gorilla. If Apple wanted to curb the proliferation of emojis, they could do it. The truth is, unless they publish a paper explaining how they were against increasing the number of emojis, they're all for it. Point me to the OracleRumors forum, and I'll express my displeasure with the preoccupation of emojis there.Please explain why you’re pointing the finger at Apple. Emojis are adopted by the Unicode Consortium, of which Apple is just one member. I’m not hearing anyone say the Oracle is too preoccupied with emojis. Maybe more blame should rest with, oh, Emojipedia, which is a full voting member. Or Huawei, who’s so interested in them that they copied Apple’s animoji. Not the kind of comment I’d expect from a moderator.
Yeah, Apple is just a bit player in the larger emoji scheme of things.Yup, every June the Unicode consortium adds new emoji, and in September Apple becomes compliant with the standard.
If Apple didn’t update, you wouldn’t be able to receive the new emoji your friends with Android might send you. And posters here at MacRumors would complain that Apple can’t even update emoji on time (“since Jobs died” / “under Tim Cook” snark semi-optional).
Pardon us but this is ridiculous. Those poor sheep like Facebook and Google and Netflix and Microsoft and IBM, those penny-ante players, those poor bit-part actors reluctantly going along with whatever the Big Bad Boss Apple wants! You must’ve been in the meetings.Apple is the 800 lb gorilla. If Apple wanted to curb the proliferation of emojis, they could do it. The truth is, unless they publish a paper explaining how they were against increasing the number of emojis, they're all for it. Point me to the OracleRumors forum, and I'll express my displeasure with the preoccupation of emojis there.
Yeah, Apple is just a bit player in the larger emoji scheme of things.![]()
If you type a message and push the emoji button, it will highlight words in golden text and when you tap on them it will give you options to replace words with emoji. This in no way saves time when writing a message as the original short set of emoji did, but neither does a search interface.I can't ever find the emojis that I want to already. We need a vastly better UI for finding them - having a single keyboard with 600 characters scrolling by is completely insane.
I suppose there's probably a third party keyboard that makes this a lot easier, isn't there? If not, maybe I should just program one...
If you type a message and push the emoji button, it will highlight words in golden text and when you tap on them it will give you options to replace words with emoji. This in no way saves time when writing a message as the original short set of emoji did, but neither does a search interface.
Not Apple. The Unicode Consortium. One working group in the consortium keeps approving the addition of new emoji to Unicode, and Apple and every other computer maker then has to go implement them. The anger / frustration / annoyance directed at Apple (over this matter) is entirely misplaced.Apple seems too preoccupied with emojis
Can we please put disclaimers in these articles stating that Apple is adopting the Unicode standard in order to prevent the chicken littles from crying about "Apple wasting their time with emojis" when its not even Apple creating them, they're just simply adopting them (which is actually very important).