Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Personally, I find the 21" iMac a bit too small.
I'm hoping a redesign means they go (back to) 24" and 30" sizes.

The standalone display for the upcoming MacPro could then be a 8K resolution at 32 or 34"
 
  • Like
Reactions: Dezlboy
May of course not...since its too close to the WWDC...so its going to be an March event or WWDC

Apple doesn't have a deep need to launch iMacs during WWDC. At this point Apple has four operating systems to cover at WWDC ( macOS , iOS , tvOS , watchOS ). If there is absolutely nothing substantive to say about four operating system then there is something colossaly wrong with their implementation strategies. When there was only one or two OS then sure fill something of the rest of the keynote with some hadware if had to flush out the time. That isn't a problem at this point. If anything the large dog pony show they do is actually too long.

In past, there has been some new hardware component drops to the market not because of WWDC but far more due to CompuTex ( which is a big major general PC hardware focused convention. ). In years past Intel (with little competition) would queue up their desktop / laptop releases for late May/ early June so that there was fresh, 'bleeding edge' stuff to show at Computex. They could afford to sit and squat to relatively arbitrary (to the hardware development process ) deadline of a annual conference so to make a bigge marketing splash. WWDC typically follows a week or so after Computex (it is more so a secondary indicator if coupled to hardware introductions. )


At this point there is more competition and their fab timelines aren't as regular. Intel has a logjam now on their 14nm process that should start to clear in March-April timeframe (adding new capacity and should be online by then). There is little upside to Intel waiting if fab is ready to go. Neither for AMD ( waiting around for Intel fab act together is kind of looney. The lead they have for 2019 product is going to close over time. )

Furthermore, June-Sept is a highly dubious time for Apple to release new hardware ( which typically needs new OS additions to be complete). From June-Aug Apple should be far more focused on getting the bugs identified in their beta release of the yearly OS for late Sept-Early October. Not chasing down new hardware quirks but far more focused on the hardware they got for the new OS they are getting ready to release ( and wrapping up any 'loose ends' on the OS they are about to push into the "no new substantive features" status. ). New hardware and new software means have two moving targets to track. That is generally not going to lead to better stability for either subsystem. ( The increasing flakey releases by Apple over the last couple of years isn't particularly surprising. )

If the hardware just happens to finish at the same time (e.g., the major component suppliers are pushing them into that corner) then fine. they should try take measures to step out of that. But for Apple to "seek out" to deliberately push hardware into the next macOS beta window is at the very least dubious and probably a bad practice. November-April would be a better place to put more Mac product releases (and to do more of them. Not hit the snooze button for 3-6 years at a time. )


Picking WWDC as a release point is like a "broken analog clock". It is 'correct' about twice a day. On these forums from January to May it is increasingly throw out as something to attach just about anything non iPhone to as a 'safe bet' . Product xyz is important to Apple will attach it to WWDC because that is where important stuff goes... ... all the while completely ignoring that WWDC is a developers convention and the yearly OS updates are previewed there. (and now that there are many more of them. )

Apple built a multimillion dollar theater. They can do a dog and pony product intro with a major Internet broadcast any month they want to with a simple short stroll from their executive offices.
 
Last edited:
Apple doesn't have a deep need to launch iMacs during WWDC. At this point Apple has four operating systems to cover at WWDC ( macOS , iOS , tvOS , watchOS ). If there is absolutely nothing substantive to say about four operating system then there is something colossaly wrong with their implementation strategies. When there was only one or two OS then sure fill something of the rest of the keynote with some hadware if had to flush out the time. That isn't a problem at this point. If anything the large dog pony show they do is actually too long.

In past, there has been some new hardware component drops to the market not because of WWDC but far more due to CompuTex ( which is a big major general PC hardware focused convention. ). In years past Intel (with little competition) would queue up their desktop / laptop releases for late May/ early June so that there was fresh, 'bleeding edge' stuff to show at Computex. They could afford to sit and squat to relatively arbitrary (to the hardware development process ) deadline of a annual conference so to make a bigge marketing splash.

At this point there is more competition and their fab timelines aren't as regular. Intel has a logjam now on their 14nm process that should start to clear in March-April timeframe (adding new capacity and should be online by then). There is little upside to Intel waiting if fab is ready to go. Neither for AMD ( waiting around for Intel fab act together is kind of looney. The lead they have for 2019 product is going to close over time. )

Furthermore, June-Sept is a highly dubious time for Apple to release new hardware ( which typically needs new OS additions to be complete). From June-Aug Apple should be far more focused on getting the bugs identified in their beta release of the yearly OS for late Sept-Early October. Not chasing down new hardware quirks but far more focused on the hardware they got for the new OS they are getting ready to release ( and wrapping up any 'loose ends' on the OS they are about to push into the "no new substantive features" status. ). New hardware and new software means have two moving targets to track. That is generally not going to lead to better stability for either subsystem. ( The increasing flakey releases by Apple over the last couple of years isn't particularly surprising. )

If the hardware just happens to finish at the same time (e.g., the major component suppliers are pushing them into that corner) then fine. they should try take measures to step out of that. But for Apple to "seek out" to deliberately push hardware into the next macOS beta window is at the very least dubious and probably a bad practice. November-April would be a better place to put more Mac product releases (and to do more of them. Not hit the snooze button for 3-6 years at a time. )


Picking WWDC as a release point is like a "broken analog clock". It is 'correct' about twice a day. On these forums from January to May it is increasingly throw out as something to attach just about anything non iPhone to as a 'safe bet' . Product xyz is important to Apple will attach it to WWDC because that is where important stuff goes... ... all the while completely ignoring that WWDC is a developers convention and the yearly OS updates are previewed there. (and now that there are many more of them. )

Apple built a multimillion dollar theater. They can do a dog and pony product intro with a major Internet broadcast any month they want to with a simple short stroll from their executive offices.

Very well articulated. Agree 100%.

The notion of WWDC being a likely hardware release point is an outdated notion from a time gone by.
 
Wow, so WWDC 2017, so less than 2 years, was completely software?
Jesus, very accurate. If there is no spring event, than there will be over 90% chances to have hardware presentation (not necessary release product) on stage
 
Wow, so WWDC 2017, so less than 2 years, was completely software?
Jesus, very accurate. If there is no spring event, than there will be over 90% chances to have hardware presentation (not necessary release product) on stage

Rest assured, Apple will hold their own event. Whether its in April, September, or some other time.
Its precisely the reason they built that giant auditorium on their own campus.
 
I think we'll see the iMac refresh at WWDC available for purchase a few weeks later, and a preview of the so-called modular Mac Pro that will be set for pre-order around the same time but will begin shipping in the falls. If Apple is serious and they believe it'll great mass hype and if the drones are willing to bite on the typical Apple fodder, then Apple will need to begin manufacturing ahead of time to meet demand. Provided it isn't a DoA product.
 
I think we'll see the iMac refresh at WWDC available for purchase a few weeks later, and a preview of the so-called modular Mac Pro that will be set for pre-order around the same time but will begin shipping in the falls. If Apple is serious and they believe it'll great mass hype and if the drones are willing to bite on the typical Apple fodder, then Apple will need to begin manufacturing ahead of time to meet demand. Provided it isn't a DoA product.

Argg, why do people keep talking about WWDC? Apple has their own giant hi tech auditorium for announcing hardware now.
WWDC is a software event. They only announced hardware there for years because it was a convenient space. Now they have their own (better) space.
I’ll bet anyone here $100 they wont release major hardware at WWDC anymore.
 
  • Like
Reactions: apolloa and xgman
Rest assured, Apple will hold their own event. Whether its in April, September, or some other time.
Its precisely the reason they built that giant auditorium on their own campus.
That auditorium is for the small events, under 1000 seats, not for WWDC where they need over 5000
So Steve jobs Theater is for eventually March and September/October events
[doublepost=1547743787][/doublepost]
I’ll bet anyone here $100 they wont release major hardware at WWDC anymore
"Apple has their own giant hi tech auditorium for announcing hardware now."
You are contradict yourself in the same comment , that is saying a lot that you dont believe in your own believing
 
That auditorium is for the small events, under 1000 seats, not for WWDC where they need over 5000
So Steve jobs Theater is for eventually March and September/October events
[doublepost=1547743787][/doublepost]
So now from software only, you are on "not major hardware"
HHhahah...100$ for what? what is major hardware?! you must be specific otherwise...

‘major hardware’ = computers.
And, given the low priority traditional computers now have at apple, I would guess they would feel a 1000 person auditorium is just fine for any mac annoucements.
 
  • Like
Reactions: orbital~debris
Dear, you said "Apple has their own giant hi tech auditorium for announcing hardware now."
So any hardware, than after few sentences you said major hardware...maybe tomorrow you will come around
macs are still loved by people that goes to WWDC...developers coders etc
And to present new imacs and the new mac pro is too low for an event even for the Steve Theatre
I hate 1 hour event, and i bet everyone who is going there hate it too...but WWDC soft+hardware for 2-2.5h is about love
 
Dear, you said "Apple has their own giant hi tech auditorium for announcing hardware now."
So any hardware, than after few sentences you said major hardware...maybe tomorrow you will come around
macs are still loved by people that goes to WWDC...developers coders etc
And to present new imacs and the new mac pro is too low for an event even for the Steve Theatre
I hate 1 hour event, and i bet everyone who is going there hate them too...but WWDC soft+hardware is about love

Thats all great, my love. I just dont think they’ll use wwdc to announce macs anymore. Just my belief. So dont worry your pretty little head about it.

The good thing is, unlike so many other silly back-and-forth debates here on macrumors, we'll find out in the next 5 months or so if I'm right. If I'm wrong, you can rain down all the 'I told you so's' you want on me and I'll just have to take it :)
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: orbital~debris
My guess is they want to release it as soon as it's ready. They'll send them out to reviewers with an embargo.
 
Hey guys, I really want to buy an Mac this year.

Do you guys really think they will add a i9 9900k to the iMac? I doubt it, but that CPU would be perfect for my needs.

I use Cubase 10 alot with many sample libaries. I think any kind of iMac Pro or Mac Pro 7,1 would be an overkill for audio. Best would be the 2019 iMac.
 
I bought an iMac at the end of 2018. Should I have waited for the new version coming out this year?
 
I bought an iMac at the end of 2018. Should I have waited for the new version coming out this year?
depends. if you needed it then its fine, keep it. If you could wait then its better to wait as you can then decide if you want the new one or get the old one discounted.
But you might be waiting a while so it really is up to you.

I'm waiting but some people don't. The saying is - if you need it then get it, if you don't then wait. IT really IS that simple :)
 
  • Like
Reactions: MandiMac
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.