Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
People say Apple isn't innovating anymore, but this is true innovation. Putting chips like this into mainstream devices that most consumers use and most other companies in our daily lives can actually have a stab at implementing to make our lives better. Sure, Android had NFC first, but nobody cared or could realistically find it supported locally outside of big cities until Apple Pay and the likes were launched. Hope this is the same for indoor navigation (e.g. at airports you've never been to before, to find the gate quickly)..
 
  • Like
Reactions: Abazigal
I'm sure someone has already said this, but do you think the 'R' in R1 probably stands for Reality? A reality coprocessor sounds pretty exciting.
 
The headphone jack being removed, yes, but the iPhone X included an adapter - why take that away? Not everyone wants to listen to overpriced Beats or Bose wireless headphones.
The current iPhones come with a set of EarPods. They connect to the lightning port and sound ok. So, no need to buy wireless. What’s the issue?
 
How can I disable this tracking device. The impact on the battery having a processor unit activated 24/7 will be there.
You apparently are not aware of the fact that iPhone’s have had an always on motion coprocessor for years since the iPhone 5s and that having this coprocessor saves power and increases battery life. No amount of bolding can hide your ignorance.
 
  • Like
Reactions: adrianlondon
So, might these tiles, in addition to having tracking functions, act like NFC tags and allow you to set ‘modes’ when you are near?

Get in your car and you have the option of shifting into driver mode (Maps app, Podcast app). In work mode, you’re asked if you want to only be interrupted when you have openings in your schedule, etc.
 
This sort of thing is critical for AR to work properly.

And whether or not anyone believes this yet, AR is going to be the next big thing in computing. it is the mobile killer app. Once AR is feasible, the desktop or laptop PC is pretty much done for a huge number of workers. So many workers are doing manual data collection and data entry that could be done via automated methods with an AR platform.

This will kick off inside of 5 years.

Why stop there? Have robots replace the workers. Automation will be one of the ways there will be less “workers” in society, so I don’t think you’re thinking this all the way through
 
The headphone jack being removed, yes, but the iPhone X included an adapter - why take that away? Not everyone wants to listen to overpriced Beats or Bose wireless headphones.

I would imagine Apple did their research and recognized that many of their users no longer used wired headphones so the adapter was a waste of money. Sounds like they made a business decision. Sure, not everyone wants to use wireless headphones, but there is no doubt that wireless is the future. Other companies are moving on too. I suppose if someone really really needs it, there are plenty of options out there, just seems like a silly sticking point.
 
Seriously: Why can't Apple make an edge-to-edge display for its phones?!?!?!

Is it because their design team is too lazy?
 
Going through your posts is all one has to do to prove you're wrong.

The original poster made this basic statement:

No discussion of Bluetooth whatsoever.


You followed up with this post:

So as per your usual tactics you tried to narrow the tracking feature down to being based on Bluetooth only (even though the OP didn't mention Bluetooth). You conveniently ignored the fact that Apple is using multiple additional sensors, adding in an IMU, relying on cameras AND using the AoA and AoD features of BT 5.1 and combining them all together for tracking.

After this @mdriftmeyer pointed out that Apple is on the board of the Bluetooth group and contributes technology to the BT standard (along with several other tech companies). You apparently didn't like that and responded with this ridiculous post:

So you've done yet another pivot. This time you're arguing whether Apple is the only one responsible for contributing these features when nobody ever stated that. As usual, you're fabricating things others said and arguing against those fabrications instead of arguing against what people actually said.

And after all that you have the nerve to type this out:

The OP can claim this is an Apple innovation because they have developed a method of using multiple technologies to achieve a single function. They mentioned "Tile", which is a Bluetooth only based device. As if I need to remind you, Apple is using Bluetooth along with numerous other technologies and making a single co-processor to handle all this information. I'd call that innovation. You're the one who needs to sort your story out.



I see I'm not the only person who noticed this behavior of yours.

So... where's all that innovation again?
 
The opposite of saying it’s not innovation and keep repeating and people believe? Everyone has their personal definition of innovation.
I'm not saying the new features on the new phones just announced lack innovation...but my sense is overall it's an incremental improvement...don't get me wrong I'm still gonna get the 11 pro max...it may have been better to change the strategy and announce a less incremental new model every two years..
 
  • Like
Reactions: I7guy
Why stop there? Have robots replace the workers. Automation will be one of the ways there will be less “workers” in society, so I don’t think you’re thinking this all the way through

You can accept where this is going and prepare for it, or stick head in the sand and be surprised by it.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.