That's marketing.3g = 3G 70kb
hsdpa = 3.5G 200-400kb
HSDPA (as well as HSUPA) is just a update of the 3G specs.
That's marketing.3g = 3G 70kb
hsdpa = 3.5G 200-400kb
Isn't it actually...?
gprs = 2G 7+kB/s (56-114kb/s) [wikipedia]
edge = 2.5G 20+kB/s (236.8kb/s) [wikipedia]
etc, as 1b ≠ 1B, 8b = 1B![]()
I wonder why it didnt have a Front camera from the start. Any old japanese phone does...
That's marketing.
HSDPA (as well as HSUPA) is just a update of the 3G specs.
Possible, but unlikely. The video chat would be a HUGE bandwidth hog on the cellular network, not to mention the battery. They could possibly limit it to Wi-Fi only, but that doesn't seem like Apple's style to complicate things like that.
gprs = 2G 5kb
edge = 2.5G 20+kb
3g = 3G 70kb
hsdpa = 3.5G 200-400kb
hsdpa in the uk is at 1.8MBits, moving upto 3.6MBits this year, I myself have experienced the glory of 1.8MBits on my old Toshiba g500, its the onlything that lets my iphone down.
ordinary 3g has speeds about 0.7Mbits I think
Everything that Apple has done over the last few years should prove to everyone that it pays to wait unless you absolutely need the product immediately.
dont be petty it was obvious I know my sh it
![]()
3G (or UMTS) is just an umbrella name for the likes of HSDPA, HSPA, HSUPA etc.
Evidently you don't.
3G (or UMTS) is just an umbrella name for the likes of HSDPA, HSPA, HSUPA etc.
I had an idea like this in that Jan. to Jun. waiting time but a little different:
the camera would be on a turnable wheel sort of thing. it would face outward for pic/ video & inward for pics(photo booth)/ video/ video chat. also a mic would be on the wheel. I don't think that apple would put 2 cameras in a cell phone that they are trying to make as small and thin as the can. I know that in the pic the camera is way too small that was my mistake when I was making it. But its more about the idea.
Better add more meat to the camera wheel, because all your images will be your fingerprints.
I had an idea like this in that Jan. to Jun. waiting time but a little different:
the camera would be on a turnable wheel sort of thing. it would face outward for pic/ video & inward for pics(photo booth)/ video/ video chat. also a mic would be on the wheel. I don't think that apple would put 2 cameras in a cell phone that they are trying to make as small and thin as the can. I know that in the pic the camera is way too small that was my mistake when I was making it. But its more about the idea.
If you are going to be that picky, then I will as well.
"3G (or UMTS)" isn't an accurate use of 3G.
3G = umbrella name for any "3rd generation" cellular network technology. The actual IMT-2000 standard includes air interfaces for W-CDMA (UMTS, HSDPA, HSUPA), CDMA2000 (1xRTT, EV-DO), TD-SCDMA, and 802.16e-2005 (mobile Wimax).
Most common 3G tech :
UMTS "classic" (384kb/s) = UMTS revision '99
HSDPA = UMTS rev v.5
HSUPA = UMTS rev v.6
EVDO Rev.0 = CDMA2000 EV-DO
EVDO Rev.A = CDMA2000 EV-DO
EVDO Rev.B = CDMA2000 3X
If you are going to be that picky, then I will as well.
"3G (or UMTS)" isn't an accurate use of 3G.
3G = umbrella name for any "3rd generation" cellular network technology. The actual IMT-2000 standard includes air interfaces for W-CDMA (UMTS, HSDPA, HSUPA), CDMA2000 (1xRTT, EV-DO), TD-SCDMA, and 802.16e-2005 (mobile Wimax).
Most common 3G tech :
UMTS "classic" (384kb/s) = UMTS revision '99
HSDPA = UMTS rev v.5
HSUPA = UMTS rev v.6
EVDO Rev.0 = CDMA2000 EV-DO
EVDO Rev.A = CDMA2000 EV-DO
EVDO Rev.B = CDMA2000 3X
... as well as TD-CDMA/UMTS-TDD (IMT-TD), TD-SCDMA (IMT-TD), EDGE (IMT-SC) and DECT (IMT-FT)."3G (or UMTS)" isn't an accurate use of 3G. 3G = umbrella name for any "3rd generation" cellular network technology. The actual IMT-2000 standard includes air interfaces for W-CDMA (UMTS, HSDPA, HSUPA), CDMA2000 (1xRTT, EV-DO), TD-SCDMA, and 802.16e-2005 (mobile Wimax).
this would be amazing. ever see those cisco commercials and think, iChat can do that... I want that on my iPhone!?
yeah tap that azz winterspan tap it hard
abrooks student 101 pwned.
(sorry if you gonna act like a child so will I muhahaha)
As for a front-facing camera, this might not require a lens: Apple has a patent in place which describes a way for a display's pixels to capture an image in front of them, rather than a traditional camera lens:
Apple Integrated Sensing Display