For you is 40mm a way better in my opinion.
[automerge]1570379454[/automerge]
Both are okay, do you have other bands, e.g. leather or metal?
The 40mm looks better/bigger with non sportbands.
Just back from apple store with milanais band. I tried with 40mm (of my girlfriend) and mine (44mm). 44mm looks more professional but for everyday I guess 40 is better. At the same time 44mm looks more like a watch than iwatch. View attachment 867195View attachment 867197View attachment 867198
Yes I think like you jaytee86. Small watch looks like a tiny fitbit or other thing. Big screen with roman number looks like more a watch. I never used a regular watch but I know that looks like big and no elegant. With AW is looks like normal.
It depends also of screen.
my wrist is 165 and i choose the 40mm S5. I wanted it to look and feel like watch and just blend in with my arm and not stand out. curve with my arm more. It got me thinking, how big are rolexes and omegas? well on average, the largest Mens size rolexes are between 39 and 42mm. even the substantial omgea sea master is 42mm. I couldn't find any 44mm. so it gave me some added perspective that 40mm is really a terrific size. may help some in their decisions and feel more confident that 40mm is not small at all by watch standards. Now i do recognize 44mm having a larger screen which can display larger fonts making it easier to read since its a information focused watch, but for me, i would have to wear glasses to read either one so that was irrelevant for me and just focused on how the watch feels on my wrist.
Just back from apple store with milanais band. I tried with 40mm (of my girlfriend) and mine (44mm). 44mm looks more professional but for everyday I guess 40 is better. At the same time 44mm looks more like a watch than iwatch. View attachment 867195View attachment 867197View attachment 867198
Both 44!nice pics Fynd. It's the same size ? 40mm?
Between SS AW and or other one (black) the SS looks like more like a watch than a smart watch. Steel gives a classical look. But the other one looks pretty nice also. But I prefer traditionnel look.
Personally I think the 40mm looks better on you. 40mm on any wrist that's less than 165mm looks more like a standard watch. IMHO, the 44mm looks more like a gadget-o-matic-thing or a paroled's tracking device on medium/smaller wrists.For anyone torn between sizes that’s actually right in the middle like myself (163mm-ish) it’s worth noting that the lighter watches have a bit of a shrinking effect overall because of the contrast around the ‘dial’.
I’ve gone from SBTi to SBSS to SS now and think I landed on what’s best for me. Before getting the SS was considering the 40.
Personally I think the 40mm looks better on you. 40mm on any wrist that's less than 165mm looks more like a standard watch. IMHO, the 44mm looks more like a gadget-o-matic-thing or a paroled's tracking device on medium/smaller wrists.
Anyways you're the one who wears it and at the end of the day you should go with the size you like most.
Sorry, I had to edit the post. Both pics are of the 40mm S5. The way you take the pic actually makes a difference as these pics make the 40mm look fine on my wrist, but in person it looks smaller than this. lolI like the 42mm it looks like better than 44mm. But the second pics is more close.
Sorry, I had to edit the post. Both pics are of the 40mm S5. The way you take the pic actually makes a difference as these pics make the 40mm look fine on my wrist, but in person it looks smaller than this. lol
Thought I'd share a Nike Series 5 40mm on a 160mm wrist. Had the Series 3 42mm before this, but the 44 looked a little big. This one feels a little on the small side, but we'll see how it goes. Both pics are 40mm.