Got a tip for us?
Let us know
Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
40mm vs 44mm Apple Watch S4 - Which will you get?
- Thread starter justinf77
- Start date
- Sort by reaction score
It’s the other way around mate and only women wear space grey watches.
Got S5 SSSB 40mm, fine for me, I mostly read notifications and stream audio to airpods so not sure what’s the point (other than battery life) to go with the bigger one for me. Smaller watches are classier plus when used in rough situations one can add an Otterbox/Rhinoshield case and still keep it pretty compact.
My vote goes to the 40mm. Currently I have S2 (42mm) that I got in 2018. I wouldn't have gotten the 42 otherwise but a special offer was too good to pass (249€, about 282 US dollars) so I bought my very first Apple Watch in 42mm 
Now, I've been eying AW S4 offers as it's leaving the markets for good. Finally, I found my next watch: S4 Nike+ 40mm (SG with black sport loop). And the price is almost as good as last time: 314,90€ which makes about 356 US dollars. Although I'm downsizing, I know I will be more than happy with the 40mm 'cos already sometimes my 42mm feels a bit big (wrist is: left 145mm, right 150mm lol what?). Of course if the 44mm would have been priced like this, I've would have gotten it but surely complained how big it is lol X)
I guess my new AW motto is: "when there's a great offer, the size of the watch doesn't matter"
Now, I've been eying AW S4 offers as it's leaving the markets for good. Finally, I found my next watch: S4 Nike+ 40mm (SG with black sport loop). And the price is almost as good as last time: 314,90€ which makes about 356 US dollars. Although I'm downsizing, I know I will be more than happy with the 40mm 'cos already sometimes my 42mm feels a bit big (wrist is: left 145mm, right 150mm lol what?). Of course if the 44mm would have been priced like this, I've would have gotten it but surely complained how big it is lol X)I guess my new AW motto is: "when there's a great offer, the size of the watch doesn't matter"
I'm looking to finally upgrade from my first gen Apple Watch. I have a 42mm and I'm trying to to figure out how that compares to the newer models sized 40 and 44mm. Is it right that a 5th gen 40 mm has a slightly bigger screen than an older 42mm but the 40mm is overall 2mm shorter? I'm trying to decide without actually trying it on since I'll order online.
After a long consideration, decided to go with the 40mm as the 44mm makes it feel like I am wearing a gadget, whilst the 40mm looks much like a watch on my wrist.
however, can anyone be kind to recommend a say 20mm width strap for the Apple Watch, I kinda think 22mm looks too thick.
however, can anyone be kind to recommend a say 20mm width strap for the Apple Watch, I kinda think 22mm looks too thick.
The 5+ year debate goes on
For me, a few people here have hit the nail on the head where they’ve said that if you want to use your watch as an everyday gadget, the bigger watch is the way to go.
It has more space to display UI elements, bigger touch targets etc.
Whereas, if you want to use it primarily as a smart fitness watch, then the 40 inch case is probably more proportional & subtle for most.
However, even for regular date/time/moveable bezel mechanical dive watches, 44-46mm is pretty normal nowadays.
I would say that large watches have become more common, for two simple reasons:
That most people want to show off their possession.
And a larger watch face just looks better (although context is everything: a large watch face might look OTT on some people’s wrists).
They don’t need to be that large: the Rolex Submariner that Sean Connery wore in Dr No had a 36mm case.
So as always, there really is no wrong or right answer, there’s just a variety of factors - except I don’t think it’s helpful to say that the 40mm version is the one for women!
For me, a few people here have hit the nail on the head where they’ve said that if you want to use your watch as an everyday gadget, the bigger watch is the way to go.
It has more space to display UI elements, bigger touch targets etc.
Whereas, if you want to use it primarily as a smart fitness watch, then the 40 inch case is probably more proportional & subtle for most.
However, even for regular date/time/moveable bezel mechanical dive watches, 44-46mm is pretty normal nowadays.
I would say that large watches have become more common, for two simple reasons:
That most people want to show off their possession.
And a larger watch face just looks better (although context is everything: a large watch face might look OTT on some people’s wrists).
They don’t need to be that large: the Rolex Submariner that Sean Connery wore in Dr No had a 36mm case.
So as always, there really is no wrong or right answer, there’s just a variety of factors - except I don’t think it’s helpful to say that the 40mm version is the one for women!
The 5+ year debate goes on
For me, a few people here have hit the nail on the head where they’ve said that if you want to use your watch as an everyday gadget, the bigger watch is the way to go.
It has more space to display UI elements, bigger touch targets etc.
Whereas, if you want to use it primarily as a smart fitness watch, then the 40 inch case is probably more proportional & subtle for most.
However, even for regular date/time/moveable bezel mechanical dive watches, 44-46mm is pretty normal nowadays.
I would say that large watches have become more common, for two simple reasons:
That most people want to show off their possession.
And a larger watch face just looks better (although context is everything: a large watch face might look OTT on some people’s wrists).
They don’t need to be that large: the Rolex Submariner that Sean Connery wore in Dr No had a 36mm case.
So as always, there really is no wrong or right answer, there’s just a variety of factors - except I don’t think it’s helpful to say that the 40mm version is the one for women!
Indeed lol. It’s one of those debates that really shouldn’t be a debate as there is no right answer which is better. It depends on taste, size of wrist and general preference. I’m a bloke and the 44mm looks a bit silly on my wrist so I have now had 2 40mm AW’s. Some of my mates have 40mm’s and some have 44mm’s. I don’t think I’ve ever heard anybody away from Mac Rumours suggest either is better? I mean it’s one thing someone insisting their preference is the best but we’ve even got people here suggesting the size is gender specific!
As much as I prefer the comfort and fit of the 40mm on a 7" wrist being 69" tall, the screen was much clearer on the 44mm with many of the background and reading stats while moving. I use the watch mostly for activity monitoring (running, weights, walks, boot camp, bike rides, etc), so needed the extra battery life over an arm ornament. 40mm is a nice option for mostly looking at time, but the 44mm is definitely a must when reading metrics, etc on the move or stationary.
As ancient as these posts are, they are fun to read through and VERY helpful. It was initially a challenge to decide which watch size would be suited better for my needs. I focused on functionality over aesthetics in the end for my usage case scenario.
As ancient as these posts are, they are fun to read through and VERY helpful. It was initially a challenge to decide which watch size would be suited better for my needs. I focused on functionality over aesthetics in the end for my usage case scenario.
Attachments
I’ve always had the 38/40mm as I am a woman with small wrists but yesterday I bought the 44mm and I love it!
Wirst about 17,5 cm
S4 40mm, steel with milanese band.
Looks ok?
S4 40mm, steel with milanese band.
Looks ok?
I want to buy an Apple Watch but i want to know what size you recommend? My wrist size is 19 centimeters
My wrist isn't too large. It's 6 3/4. I need to have a band that you can put in the correct hole for wrist size. The magnetic kind, I have always, kept loosening up, if your in any kind of movement activity. I have a good leather band that works extremly well. The smaller size would have been better, it is good for seeing, the 44.
[automerge]1594579685[/automerge]
Looks good. I have a Milanese. If I'm moving my arm around in a atletic activity it will loosen up, all you have to do is wash the milanese off and your good to go.Wirst about 17,5 cm
S4 40mm, steel with milanese band.
Looks ok?
Thats a personal coice. My small 17 cm wrist, does ok with the 44 mm, but it's rather large on my wrist.
What’s your wrist size ?View attachment 805434 I went to the Apple Store today to try the sizes/colours etc. I didn't notice that much difference between the two sizes on my wrist tbh. I've attached photos I'd really appreciate a second opinion
I have 7 3/4" wrists so the 44mm s5 was the perfect choice. For all you metric system users that's 197mm.
Last edited:
This my my Apple Watch Series 4 44 mm vs series 5 40 mm video, it's Turkish but i think it will give you an idea. My wrist is 19 cm-> almost 7,4 inch
Hi guys,
I’m currently using a Series 3 Ceramic Edition, 42mm. I’ve got a chance of getting a nice deal on a Series 5 Ceramic 40mm. How has anybody coped going from an older 42mm to a newer 40mm??
My only real problem is that I’m using the Apple Stainless Steel space black link bracelet, 42/44mm. That won’t fit, will it?
I’m currently using a Series 3 Ceramic Edition, 42mm. I’ve got a chance of getting a nice deal on a Series 5 Ceramic 40mm. How has anybody coped going from an older 42mm to a newer 40mm??
My only real problem is that I’m using the Apple Stainless Steel space black link bracelet, 42/44mm. That won’t fit, will it?