artifex
macrumors 6502a
Rootman said:That would be the long-rumored iRack.
Dude, I'm afraid to go there. Know what I mean?
Rootman said:That would be the long-rumored iRack.
Lord Blackadder said:Actually, the iMac name fits this computer well, since it conforms to the iMac principle: A cheap computer for beginner Mac users with maximum hardware integration ; this machine merely trades the integrated display for a lower price.
But to join the Name Game I'll submit "cMac" : "c" for Cheap, Consumer, Cost-effective Computing.
But then came the low times. Who could forget the pain of "Flower Power" or the agony of "Dalmatian?" Oh, the horror; the horror.I remember at a cocktail party in SoHo onceit must have been in the mid-90sSusan Sontag, Haruki Murakami and I spent hours debating the merits of Mac OS 8s new Platinum theme. Those were fine times, indeed.
dsharits said:True, you can get a Dell for $499, but it will be a low-end brick. If you compare Apples to apples (pardon the pun), you will actually see that the Macs are cheaper. For a Windows computer, you have to figure in the antivirus subscription, the repair bills and the headaches that will come from it, and see that Macs, which may cost a few dollars more to start out, will be far more cost effective in the long run. No antivirus, infinitely better software, and no headaches after being on the phone with India for three hours. It's even worse for businesses that lose business time because of computer problems. Also, the resell value is much higher on Macs than PC's. Show me a PC from 1999 that people are willing to pay $350+ for today. The B&W G3's sell for that much and more. I have a Beige G3 from 1997 running 10.3.7 with minor upgrades. Find me a PC from 1997 that can run XP with minor upgrades. You can't do it.
Daniel
Or not at all, as "announced" by Apple. It's a Moto phone. I think Steve will mention it, but that's all. It will not be available at Apple stores, or even on the website. It'll be Moto's name on the phone, Apple will be mentioned on the box (and buried in the maze of dopey menus somewhere on the phone itself).Damek said:BTW, I also think the whole Apple phone thing is going to disappoint people. It may be true that Apple & Motorola are working on such a device, but I highly doubt it'll show up this soon.
(snip)
The phone can come next June.
digitaleon said:There's another possibility - or perhaps dual use - for this device; thin client-esque devices that add processing with XGrid...
Thoughts?
powermac666 said:I thought it was hilarious.![]()
Perfect, Apple could start weeding out the riff-raff by grepping Mac Forums' posts for people who need smilies for comprehensionSiliconAddict said:It would help if there was.....![]()
The whole internet and typed text thing makes determining one's tone of voice just a tad difficult.
sjpetry said:I wonder what the name will be for the headless Mac?![]()
Damek said:Hmm... anybody else hear that whooshing sound? (It's the joke flying over CubaTBird's head.)
anonymous161 said:I think we are forgetting iMac Express![]()
Forty thousand points to jettredmont. One hundred forty thousand points, even though iCabod would be better suited for all those poor Dells which fall victim to the headless iMac. Too bad you can't work Brom Bones into the Mac naming scheme, eh?jettredmont said:iCabod
Rootman said:Wasn't there a rumor of a screenless iPod?
Along with a headless iMac, are we witnessing the end of the GUI? Are we ready for this? We freaked when Next and then Apple dropped the floppy drive. Let's not panic when Steve takes us beyond the bondage of the display.
Lepton said:They got it right about the begging and pleading alright. They should have done this AGES and AGES ago! Finally! I'm going to be very happy.
jettredmont said:iCabod
Mr_Ed said:...Everyone knows a Twinkie should be enjoyed with white wine...