Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Originally posted by jbembe
The price isn't too bad, if it was under $200 I would have felt a little burned seeing as how I got the 40 GB 2 months ago.

SAME HERE!!!

Gee if it was about value why not strap an XRAID to your back and enjoy that $3/Gig value, you could carry a million songs everywhere you go. You could christen it the iHump.

How many times could you fly around the world without hearing the same song with the iHump??

Great IDEA!

LOL
 
biking

maybe in a few years I'll take up biking - but then I can just strap my powerbook (or a G5 for that matter) on the rat-trap - no need for a memory-deprived iPod mini. on the other hand, I live in NYC and the potholes here would cause more jostling to the iPod than running!
 
$249 may sound a lot when you compare the 4gb to a 15GB, but when you compare it to similar size, mid to high quality products elsewhere, it's right on the mark, and product differentiation is enough to make the iPodmini a product in its own right. But none of this makes sense if you arent in the target market (hence why no applause from the Mac faithful at the conference most of whom stuck their hands up when asked who had an iPod) the ones who all have the cash and or the requirements for 40gigas.

30% more of the potential market (with less demanding technical requirements than developers and rumor forum posters) are suddenly going to take a serious look at an Apple iPod - rather than ogle at one and think wouldnt it be luvly but its too big for me - Now the iPod is not an exclusively mega giga MP3, and when these extra 30% of punters look at comparable size storage products they will see ample evidence that "small form factors cost more" and they will see that iPod minis are very similarly priced or exactly the same price - and looks ways they wont see anything to better the coolest and ultra reliable iPod mini.

Apple arent in the low end market for anything, if u want an Apple product you have to suffer a bit to get it. That's why, IMO, Mac owners are dare I say proud of their hardware, because it cost more than they wanted to pay, but they certainly got more than their money's worth. The wow factor comes with an iPod mini, not with a Dell whatever it is, or that other RCA thing that weighs 3 pounds.

And working on the current exchange rates, the £142 starting price in the UK ( before the hidden extras get added on for not being in the USA ) that aint so bad, especially when my mate tells me he is looking to spend £200 on a fancy flash player all of 256MB big!
 
Re: iPod UK price?

Originally posted by TMA
I had a look at Apple UK's website (www.apple.com/uk) and can't see any mention of the iPod mini.

I'm curious, and scared, to see what Apple are going to charge in the UK for this. We already pay a hell of alot more than the USA for almost all Apple hardware, standard iPods included. Apple better not think that $249 = £200+ or i'll be one pissed little bunny. At current exchange rates it should be around £140 (http://www.xe.com) I actually think this is an ok price for what you're getting although a cheaper 2gig model might have been nice.

Finally, I personally would pick this over the cheapest standard iPod. The size and practicality of the unit is more important to me than the size of the hard disk (oeeerrr sounds abit kinky 😉 )

Edit: ERRM I'm slightly worried that the iPod mini isn't going to appear on Apple uk at all! Perhaps i'm just being paranoid.

Didn't Steve say it wasn't availible worldwide until April. Maybe the do not want international orders yet.
Just a guess.
 
Originally posted by allonzoallegro
Do other sports have as much problem with using the iPod as runners do? I've never even bothered to try and use it when training, just from the number of people who have said you just can't job with it (since it's a hard drive)...

Just wondering.

The problem with running is that you are never at a point of no-jarring for more than half a pace. The iPod is "safe" for running because it doesn't spin up the HD when it is being knocked around, and when the HD spins up a whole bunch is read into RAM so that it can spin down again and sleep for a few minutes (I forget how much RAM it has). If you go through that entire buffer without giving the HD a moment of serenity to do its thing, then the music has to stop until you do.

Some other sports tend to be less intensive, allowing time every couple of seconds for the drive to spin up and down.

Of course, this is all just in theory. In practice, I haven't seen anyone who' been able to make their iPod skip.
 
Re: Re: Low end MP3 Market?????

Originally posted by humangod
maybe "you" want to read what i said and try to comprehoend it before you run your mouth off. i said steve wanted to go after the low end cheap-o mp3 player market. any flash player IS a low end mp3 player. what i said was exactly correct. now shut up.

steve showed a graph representing the mp3 players.. he showed the rest of the market that apple does not own. he said apple wants to get into that market.

how is a 50 dollar off ipod going to do that?

oh boy, you told me to shut up....you are so angry...I'm so scared....settle down dude....steve DID NOT say he was going after the cheap o MP3 player market....go back and watch and you'll see there are three slices to Steve's pie....he stated that he was not interesting in going after the low- low end market, but the middle market....you are the one saying flash based players are the low end market....steve was more precise about the players he wanted to go after with the mini....besides how is a 199$ flash player necessarily cheap??? That's still way beyond what you want to spend yet you continue to claim this is part of the el cheap-o market....get your facts straight, calm down and stop telling people to shut up, it's just rude and unbecoming.....
 
Originally posted by uv23
Nice but still too expensive. For the $50 differential, there's no reason for me to buy this over the 15gb iPod.

very true...i would have preferred 199 usd

i still think the product with it's thinness and small size is a beautiful and amazing product

there were no major computer announcements, for the masses, but i think the mini ipod was worthy enough for the likes of mwsf

great job, apple
 
new mini-ipod pricing...

....I can't figure out the whining on the price ---- my take is that the "cost" of ipods is only a small part the hard disk component and the final price has little relationship with the *size* of the hard disk.

For example, a quick scan of the OWC site for internal drives reveals:

40 GB drive - $66
80 GB drive - $74
120 GB drive - $99
180 GB drive - $175
250 GB drive - $319

...now based on everyone's complaints/logic why would anyone buy a 40 or 80?

.....remember, it's not the size of the ship (disk), it's the motion of the ocean! ...and its the ipod's motion that costs...
 
Does anyone have any idea what the battery life is like on the iPod mini? I looked at Apple's tech specs and it appears that it has the same battery life as the regular iPods (8 hours).
 
Originally posted by billyboy

And working on the current exchange rates, the £142 starting price in the UK ( before the hidden extras get added on for not being in the USA ) that aint so bad, especially when my mate tells me he is looking to spend £200 on a fancy flash player all of 256MB big!

I bet my bottom dollar he will only have a pound change from his 200 pounds when the ipod mini is launched in the UK.

On a side note, with the current exchange rates it is now cheaper to buy a return flight from london to new york, go to an apple store in NY buy a 15" powerbook, go out for a nice meal, stay in a hotel and go home the next day than buying the same powerbook in a UK store
 
Re: Re: iPod UK price?

Originally posted by pjkelnhofer
Didn't Steve say it wasn't availible worldwide until April. Maybe the do not want international orders yet.
Just a guess.
You are correct AFAIK.

iPod Mini = Released in Feb for the US market
iPod Mini = The good for nothing rest of the world has to wait until April (only 3 months to wait for this over priced beauty!!!!)

..it just beggars belief...🙄
 
Re: Re: iPod UK price?

Originally posted by pjkelnhofer
Didn't Steve say it wasn't availible worldwide until April. Maybe the do not want international orders yet.
Just a guess.

Didn't see the keynote because I was at work, but if that's true then 🙁 🙁 🙁 🙁 🙁 🙁

Perhaps it'll be available to us around the same time as iTMS i.e in time for next Xmas 🙁
 
Does anyone beside me think that the iPod mini's look isn't as good as it could have been? It looks like they shrunk the ipod slightly, then lopped off the sides. The sides of the wheel are too close to the edges (rounded sides) for my taste. For the scroll-wheel UI, I think the iPod mini looks a bit too tall and narrow.

My 2 cents.
 
is this Flash based?

Is this flash memory based, or just a small hard drive?

I guess skip protectionimplies a hard drive, but i thought maybe the armband implied it was more sturdy and for jogging.
 
Originally posted by uv23
A lot of people are talking about the price of the mini being justified because it is going up against the high-end flash market. But if it is indeed hard drive-based, then in reality it is not competing at all; it exists only in an awkward purgatory. It will suffer all of the same problems that the iPod suffers in "active" listening conditions, such as running, working out, etc. There is a lot more forgiveness regarding shock, vibration, and movement from solid state media than there is from hard drives.

Hmm. Well, actually, the smaller 1" drives tend to be rather robust with regards to shock and vibration issues. Smaller platters, spinning slower == less tendency to wobble and crash into heads.

Granted, solid state will always win out with that regard (for obvious reasons) ... on the other hand, the high-end flash market is dominated by players with horrible design gaffs that guarantee breakage long before the internal HD of a minipod might start showing its age. Look for reviews of Rio and RCA's and Creatives "high-end" players. The workmanship is shoddy, yet masked by ignorant design (like unprotected flash-card slots and flimsy joysticks and USB slot covers so thin you can see through them which tear after two round-trips).
 
Originally posted by mullmann
Afraid you've got it backwards. Jobs has repeatedly said that there is little to no profit to be had in the software (music). The profit is all in the hardware.


That sounds disturbing like what IBM told Bill Gates. "sure take your silly software...we will rake it in with the hardware"
 
Originally posted by jettredmont
The problem with running is that you are never at a point of no-jarring for more than half a pace. The iPod is "safe" for running because it doesn't spin up the HD when it is being knocked around, and when the HD spins up a whole bunch is read into RAM so that it can spin down again and sleep for a few minutes (I forget how much RAM it has). If you go through that entire buffer without giving the HD a moment of serenity to do its thing, then the music has to stop until you do.

Some other sports tend to be less intensive, allowing time every couple of seconds for the drive to spin up and down.

Of course, this is all just in theory. In practice, I haven't seen anyone who' been able to make their iPod skip.


Mine skips - I don't use it for running anymore and I'm not going to buy another one with less memory that also skips. I guess I could stop during my run and wait a few minutes for the RAM to re-fill - but that would spoil the whole run - I'm sticking with the radio now.
 
Re: is this Flash based?

Originally posted by BOOMBA
Is this flash memory based, or just a small hard drive?
I read somehere here that it is a small hitachi hard drive, maybe like the IBM microdrives? I dunno.
 
NeatGekko

NeatGekko, I am dining on crow pie. After you posted your prediction, I made fun of newbs who make bold predictions. But you were utterly correct in what you said. I hope you continue to serve the MacRumors community. 🙂

P.S. The best way to go about it is to send your intelligence discreetly to MacRumors. Now that you've proven your authenticity, anything you share can become a headlining story (as long as you maintain a winning record, of course). This is a much better way to be believed than if you simply make "voice from the dust" posts within the discussions.
 
Originally posted by jettredmont
The problem with running is that you are never at a point of no-jarring for more than half a pace. The iPod is "safe" for running because it doesn't spin up the HD when it is being knocked around, and when the HD spins up a whole bunch is read into RAM so that it can spin down again and sleep for a few minutes (I forget how much RAM it has). If you go through that entire buffer without giving the HD a moment of serenity to do its thing, then the music has to stop until you do.

Some other sports tend to be less intensive, allowing time every couple of seconds for the drive to spin up and down.

Of course, this is all just in theory. In practice, I haven't seen anyone who' been able to make their iPod skip.

(I forget how much RAM it has).

they have 32 mb
 
iPod mini Capacity Specs

Capacity


4GB, 15GB, 20GB or 40GB hard disk drive(1)


Holds 1,000, 3,700, 5,000 or 10,000 songs in 128-Kbps AAC format(2)

Stores data via FireWire or USB 2.0(3) hard drive
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.