Yeah I think it was fairly clear that wasn't the poster's motivation in clinging onto his 6S.Also saved money.
Yeah I think it was fairly clear that wasn't the poster's motivation in clinging onto his 6S.Also saved money.
I don't think that's accurate. I think only Pro's will have OLED this year (based on my memory of leaks throughout the year). But also, the iPhone 7 and 8 were both LED, and they are larger than the rumored 5.4" non pro phone.
Apple could bring out an iPhone Audio Pro model, with not just a jack, but a very high quality jack and DAC. It would be hilarious as all the "jack is dead" crowd rushed to buy it, and all the other phone makers rushed to copy it.The line/phones out in Macs an iPhones have been getting continually worse in terms of analogue audio quality. The one in the original iPod Shuffle (the white USB stick thingy) was surprisingly good and that's actually what I still use (with various decent headphones) to check an audio engineer's work on the go. Having no screen distraction is a bonus.
Anyone working with audio on a Mac has a little audio interface where they can plug in monitor speakers and high impedance headphones.
I like to listen to a podcast with a 15 minute timer to fall asleep (think of it as ASMR), so I have one bud in one ear, volume to minimum and phone charging at the same time. With lightning headphones, I would not be able to charge overnight (or is there an adapter?) and with Airpods I'd constantly lose them. And I'm not too comfortable with having a bluetooth device right in my ear every night for 8 hours, I assume they're on standby and just listening for the phone's signal after a while of no audio though.
The new SE is same size as iPhone 7 and 5.4" will be smaller than that.
[automerge]1594044827[/automerge]
Honestly my SE1 battery life is fine on iOS 13. Are you using SE1 or SE2? If you are using an SE1 I suggest you check your battery health. It's about $50 for new battery from Apple.
Fear not. Apple isn't shipping a port-less iPhone anytime soon.I have my doubts about getting the 5.4” iPhone 12, or waiting to the rumored port-less 5.5” iPhone 13. Why? Because iPhone 13 will have (reportedly):
- Much better cameras, with nearly 50MP and a revolutionary new technology
- LTPO Screens to allow always-on displays
- Probably a much faster A15 SoC, built on the same 5nm but probably with an all new architecture to diferentiate it from the iPhone 12
- Due to not having a port, the battery can be bigger, thus, better batter life.
On the other hand, I don’t want a port-less iPhone because I like to plug it in to charge while I’m using it, and because I like to perform clean installs of iOS (DFU Restores) and I doubt I will be able to do this on a port-less iPhone. So... What would you do?
Apple recommends new battery at 80%, but as you probably power user I’d get battery service now. Should be good for a year at least then.Its at 85% but dunno if that's good or bad. I bought this phone about 2 years ago. Frankly after updating to ios13 all the battery issues started. Hope ios14 fixed the issues, otherwise gotta get a battery replacement. Does yours get through the day okay?
Fair.Yeah I think it was fairly clear that wasn't the poster's motivation in clinging onto his 6S.
Wow that's patience. Shame as you missed out on 3 years of having a fantastic (not perfect) phone whilst you were waiting. I'm going to be sad to leave my X.
To be honest I am on my 4th iPhone 6s. I intentionally did not upgrade for these reasons:
- portability matters to me more than screen size
- headphone jack is still a big plus for me, because I switch on regular basis between different devices including my mac and the battery time of wireless earbuds is currently not enough for me (I go through days where I have 8 hours straight of remote business meetings)
- I use the device often on a table and lacking functionality of faceID in this mode is a setback for me
I think that the FaceID issue will be solved with this iPhone iteration and that longer lasting wireless earbuds will come out by the end of the year.
My two cents
Dude why are you still on a 6S though if an iPhone 8 literally has the same dimensions, touchID, but with better battery life, process, and camera. You realize there are headphone adaptors for the lightning port right? The iPhone 8 comes with one: https://www.apple.com/shop/product/MMX62AM/A/lightning-to-35-mm-headphone-jack-adapter
I think Apple listened to the significant numbers who said “Small one, please.” Looks perfect, and my original SE is showing its age, so timing might be perfect, too.Sounds nearly perfect. Can’t wait.
Both of the new Pros (6.1/6.7) increase in size over current Pros (5.8/6.5). Maybe the LiDAR takes extra space or power, or maybe they just want to give customers the bigger (but more expensive) screens they want and are willing to pay for.Agree, and count me among them, as long as Apple doesn’t decide that people who want a smaller form factor also want a less capable camera system, less storage, or some other deficit. Naturally I’d accept shorter battery life since the battery will in all likelihood be smaller.
I think Apple listened to the significant numbers who said “Small one, please.” Looks perfect, and my original SE is showing its age, so timing might be perfect, too.
This iPhone 5.4 is like the Second Coming to me. Hallelujah, it's happened, in an era of large and extra large. Give me non-Pro, I'm fine with that.
Or somebody could just make a USB-C-based very high quality jack and DAC that plugs into the USB-C port of future iPhones.Apple could bring out an iPhone Audio Pro model, with not just a jack, but a very high quality jack and DAC. It would be hilarious as all the "jack is dead" crowd rushed to buy it, and all the other phone makers rushed to copy it.
Agreed! It’s the only phone I still have that I didn’t sell or trade in. Definitely the best one for me in my hands. If only my battery still lasted, I would still be using it.Can’t wait!!! Still using the original SE and this looks perfect!
Sigh, you say that as if "very high quality" is something USB-C could do, but not a jack. The jack already is a "very high quality" connector, it's still around after 140 years because it is cheap, durable, small, high quality, and "just works". The jack is also still used in all the Audio Pros' other audio equipment, so putting USB-C in the phone only creates a problem of needing to either duplicate your high quality, expensive, headphones with both types, or...... dongles!!!!!! The only true reason Apple dumped it from their phones is so they could sell overpriced AirPods in droves (and boy was that successful for the profit line! - but not so successful for the Audio Pros).Or somebody could just make a USB-C-based very high quality jack and DAC that plugs into the USB-C port of future iPhones.
You made it sound like people would rush to that Audio Pro iPhone because it would enable high quality audio. But that is false, you already can have that via an external DAC/ADC. Adding a jack is about convenience, not about enablingSigh, you say that as if "very high quality" is something USB-C could do, but not a jack. The jack already is a "very high quality" connector, it's still around after 140 years because it is cheap, durable, small, high quality, and "just works". The jack is also still used in all the Audio Pros' other audio equipment,
Yeah I am saying that some people would rush to it. And some wouldn't. I think there are significant numbers in both camps. However, I'm not saying that the main reason people would choose the Audio Pro iPhone with high end DAC and high end jack, would be because current iPhones with only bluetooth or lighting connectors have slightly lower quality audio than a jack (and yes they DO). I'm mostly saying it because of the high number of people with high quality headphones with jacks, including almost all Audio Pros, but also all the wannabes. What I originally suggested was that Apple could release an Audio Pro iPhone with a high end DAC and jack; along side it's normal line of non-jack iPhones. And I was speculating that if they did release such a phone, as long as it wasn't deliberately compromised in other ways (such as with lower quality cameras), then there would be a lot of people who are currently in the "jack is dead" crowd who would jump on the Audio Pro bandwagon and go and buy high end jack headphones because it would become the new prestigious thing. Apple could even release a line of various high end Apple Audio Pro wired headphones to go with it (and a new line of high end Audio Pro bluetooth headphones while they are at it - thus possibly adding to their bottom line, rather than undermining their successful AirPods line). And then.... everyone would be happy!You made it sound like people would rush to that Audio Pro iPhone because it would enable high quality audio. But that is false, you already can have that via an external DAC/ADC. Adding a jack is about convenience, not about enabling
high quality audio. You used the wrong argument.
I’m also confused why people that got Lightning Earpods in the box would feel pressured to buy AirPods?
I'm not sure you have heard the term 'naked robotic core'. It refers to distilling something like an iPhone to a somewhat minimal core that is most universal in that it can be adapted to a lot of different use cases by adding things. One example would be a battery case. People who want a somewhat slim phone can use the phone as is, those wanting more battery life can add a battery case. The alternative to this approach would be either a heavier and thicker phone that would be overkill for a significant portion of the users in regard to battery life, thus forcing them to carry a heavier and thicker phone than strictly necessary given their battery needs. Or selling two different phones (with different battery capacities). While the latter avoids trapping people into something they don't want or need it adds fragmentation, in particular, if extended to all kind of demands: a 'battery+' phone, an 'audio+' phone, etc..Yeah I am saying that some people would rush to it. And some wouldn't. I think there are significant numbers in both camps. However, I'm not saying that the main reason people would choose the Audio Pro iPhone with high end DAC and high end jack, would be because current iPhones with only bluetooth or lighting connectors have slightly lower quality audio than a jack (and yes they DO). I'm mostly saying it because of the high number of people with high quality headphones with jacks, including almost all Audio Pros, but also all the wannabes. What I originally suggested was that Apple could release an Audio Pro iPhone with a high end DAC and jack; along side it's normal line of non-jack iPhones. And I was speculating that if they did release such a phone, as long as it wasn't deliberately compromised in other ways (such as with lower quality cameras), then there would be a lot of people who are currently in the "jack is dead" crowd who would jump on the Audio Pro bandwagon and go and buy high end jack headphones because it would become the new prestigious thing. Apple could even release a line of various high end Apple Audio Pro wired headphones to go with it (and a new line of high end Audio Pro bluetooth headphones while they are at it - thus possibly adding to their bottom line, rather than undermining their successful AirPods line). And then.... everyone would be happy!
You can't add a jack with a phone case.I'm not sure you have heard the term 'naked robotic core'. It refers to distilling something like an iPhone a somewhat minimal core that is most universal in that it can be adapted to a lot of different use cases by adding things. One example would be a battery case. People who want a somewhat slim phone can use the phone as is, those wanting more battery life can add a battery case. The alternative to this approach would be either a heavier and thicker phone that would be overkill for a significant portion of the users in regard to battery life, thus forcing them to carry a heavier and thicker phone than strictly necessary given their battery needs. Or selling two different phones (with different battery capacities). While the latter avoids trapping people into something they don't want or need it adds fragmentation, in particular, if extended to all kind of demands: a 'battery+' phone, an 'audio+' phone, etc..
Of course you can (first Google result). Just like with a battery case it is not the most space-efficient way.You can't add a jack with a phone case.
That really is a horrendous solution, and you know it. Over and out.Of course you can (first Google result). Just like with a battery case it is not the most space-efficient way.