Doesn't mean they couldn't pull an iPhone-like move by announcing it first and shipping it later.
Yeah, no.
Doesn't mean they couldn't pull an iPhone-like move by announcing it first and shipping it later.
If these are real, I'll buy a Zune.
It would make sense just to use the same iPod case but just update the OS and possibly use flash instead of a hard drive...
Wouldn't it be cool just to update the 5G iPods to the 6G OS/interface???
I also think that if they did release the 6G iPod (large capacity) with an interface like that people will be pissed. Especially because the iPhone's iTunes interface makes that look like an antique. Shame on you Apple is this is real. Although, I too could definitely see it on the Nano.I see the Nano keeping the wheel but all this R&D to get the iPhone out suggests that an iPod with a HDD and no Phone would be an easy build for them and wipe out the competition for large capacity audio players.
Its a waiting game now...
It really wouldn't. They've been riding this design for far too long. It needs to change, significantly. And the Zune interface looks great - but they don't have a click wheel, and that's the dealbreaker.
I also think that if they did release the 6G iPod (large capacity) with an interface like that people will be pissed. Especially because the iPhone's iTunes interface makes that look like an antique. Shame on you Apple is this is real. Although, I too could definitely see it on the Nano.
Anything less than multi-touch in the new iPod, and there will be a lot of very angry people who will start considering alternatives. Apple should be careful of taking its iPod marketshare for granted. The click wheel a new device will seem antique and would be the wrong move.
Like it or not, the click wheel died as the dominant interface for (regular) iPods the moment iPhone came out. It's too intuitive and downright cool to hold back. If Apple cripples the new iPod by holding out on multi touch to try and milk its consumer base more, I can imagine a lot of people who will seriously consider alternatives.
Anything less than multi-touch in the new iPod, and there will be a lot of very angry people who will start considering alternatives. Apple should be careful of taking its iPod marketshare for granted. The click wheel a new device will seem antique and would be the wrong move.
Like it or not, the click wheel died as the dominant interface for (regular) iPods the moment iPhone came out. It's too intuitive and downright cool to hold back. If Apple cripples the new iPod by holding out on multi touch to try and milk its consumer base more, I can imagine a lot of people who will seriously consider alternatives.
in the 'playing now' video, the battery status gains power. hmm..
That analogy doesn't fly (pun intended) because there really isn't anything better than the jet engine for planes even 50 years later.What would be the alternative - a Zune?
The clickwheel works great - so why not keep the costs down and use it?
It's like saying that airplanes need to stop using those "jet engines" - "jet engines" are soooo 1960's...
in the 'playing now' video, the battery status gains power. hmm..
Indeed. This video would be easy to fake in the new FinalCut Pro Suite. Motion comes to mind as the application used. At least they stuck to an Apple product to create the fake.
Bull. The click-wheel allows a continuous smooth motion when scrolling. The "flicking" is a throwback to any other MP3-player interface where you have to do repetitive abrupt motions.Also, once Apple introduced multi-touch, the click-wheel ceased to be the best interface.
Obviously "best" here is subjective. The click wheel and multiple menus just doesn't cut it for me now.Bull. The click-wheel allows a continuous smooth motion when scrolling. The "flicking" is a throwback to any other MP3-player interface where you have to do repetitive abrupt motions.
Anyway, why did this EVER reach front page? It's just ridiculously sloppy. These fakers should study the iWalk hoax for a lesson in how to make believable fakes.