Sad thing, if we would stop buying when they do this they would stop.Apple care about one thing: money. They care not nearly a much for their lineup or their users. Greedy people.
Sad thing, if we would stop buying when they do this they would stop.Apple care about one thing: money. They care not nearly a much for their lineup or their users. Greedy people.
And I can go to a Porsche dealer and declare a mid-sized four-door sedan shouldn't cost more than this in 2023(!), but I can't expect him to give me a Panamera for that price.To be fair, people can still criticize one aspect of a product and still buy that product for various other reasons.
Victoria 3 when it came out would run pretty good on Mac’s considering 8gb and fanless it was actually kinda a miracle. But with 8gb the game would just crash after a couple hours. This wouldn’t happen on 16gb ram models. So yea. It’s a limitation sadly. I just go with the pro version of the chip for my paradox games and for now it’s the best option I got laptop wise (heat, fan noise, performance, screen). The Victoria 3 apple silicon version just hit beta so here’s hoping they do EU5 in AS as well.Yea, this is very true. Unfortunately, it doesn't seem that the GPU really responds to memory compression quite as well as the CPU does. I'm able to play games like Cities Skylines on an 8GB Mac (runs with about 7GB of swap usage when it runs), but I can't imagine something more graphically intensive would do very well.
When the GPU and the CPU share RAM, 8GB is kinda tight for graphics intensive tasks. Cinebench 2024 refuses to even run its GPU tests on such systems.
Here's my data:ither side: Show me your data, or nothing you say matters.
I'm not working with a few website. Graphic design, 4K editing, Emulation, file server, gaming, AND general web use. Either way, the point is that going from 96GB (+8GB of GPU's VRAM) to 64GB is the same hit it would be if I was on a non-Apple Silicon computer. By Borchers' estimation, my 64GB should be the equivalent of 128GB. It's not, it's the equivalent of 64GB. all of their compression and memory allocation techniques kind of basically just make up for the fact that I'm sharing VRAM with the main system. So it's break even 64GB.Dynamic caching has nothing to do with RAM usage.
Really? You need 96GB of RAM to work with a few websites? Don’t be silly.
MBP is no Porsche. Almost everyone in first world countries can afford a MBP but only a minority a Porsche.And I can go to a Porsche dealer and declare a mid-sized four-door sedan shouldn't cost more than this in 2023(!), but I can't expect him to give me a Panamera for that price.
A computer is no car. Ram is not horsepower. A photo or video e.g with the same format has the same size in windows macos Linux whatever.That's like saying 500 Horsepower is more than 250 HP without taking into consideration weight of the vehicle, gearing, intended use. Etc. It depends on what you're measuring; are you measuring speed? Torque? Fuel efficiency?
But hey, you've got math skillz. Indeed, the number 16 is bigger than the number 8.
This is true. I’ve personally held off in buying a new Mac since 2014 (iMac 5K). MBA 2012 replaced by Apple with 2015 model. I think Apple has got the laptop situation all wrong. Genuinely prefer my 2015 MBA with SD Card and MagSafe to any MBA now selling. I’d like more speed, but I survive. New machine is missing HDMI and SD Card, and frankly the wedge shape was a better design. It’s easier to pick up and carry and it feels perceptively thinner and smaller, and has a keyboard angled toward the typist with a very thin front to not hitting off your wrists. Secondly, the screen sizes are wrong. MBA should come in 12.9” 16:10 screen, and a 14.2” 16:10 machine. Don’t get me started on the iMac. So many things wrong with that machine it’s not funny. MBP suffers less than excellent battery life for wireless web. Base model MBP also should not exist. Pro should mean pro, no ifs or buts.Sad thing, if we would stop buying when they do this they would stop.
Exactly because even if they did go 16 base, they wouldn't lower the price. Then the people who only need/want 8 would be "forced" to pay $200 more for no reason like with the 15PM ending the 128GB. The two biggest issues in my opinion:The real issue is with 8gb you’re gonna be limited on games. I played a few that would crash every so often on 8gb but not on 16 with m series. Anyways who cares honestly. Let people buy what they buy and if it don’t work for them, let them deal with it.
Yes! I never did acquire the taste -- it all just tastes like sucking on charcoal for some reason.You don’t drink coffee AND you are a MANAGER.
LOL!Not sure if you should be allowed in the same room with a computer.
Sorry your car analogy doesn't work for computer based RAM. I like the analogy, it just doesn't work in this case.That's like saying 500 Horsepower is more than 250 HP without taking into consideration weight of the vehicle, gearing, intended use. Etc. It depends on what you're measuring; are you measuring speed? Torque? Fuel efficiency?
But hey, you've got math skillz. Indeed, the number 16 is bigger than the number 8.
I think I am going to try that the next time I am at the Apple Store.As long as Apple is ok with me saying that every $50 I give them is really the same as the $100 they asked for, I am all good.
Sadly, you are only defending Apple's problem like a fan boy."If you're a fan of Apple's æsthetic, there aren't many other products can compete. Take the iMac, for example. Its competition like the HP Envy and Lenovo IdeaCentre. While appearance is subjective, I think most people would prefer the iMac's look and color options. Also, consider the exclusive software features that integrate the Mac with the customer's iPhone or iPad. Suddenly, buying a computer from Apple is the most appealing option despite its high price."
Yeah man. How dare they make a good product. HP and Lenovo couldn't possibly compete!
I'm sorry, what? It's not Apple's fault that other companies are bad at visual design, and bad at cross-product integration. That's on everyone else.