I do not believe anyone has mentioned the benefits of larger ram size even if you dont ordinarily go above 8gb useage. Well besides resale value.
Even if your applications dont "need" more than 8gb of ram, the system will cache more recently accessed files and code libraries. This will return a "fetch" faster than if the system has to go all the way to the SSD for the data. SSD is fast, but not as fast as DDR1600. Also recall that the memory controller is on the CPU for these chips. The SSD is controlled by the chipset. So that introduces latency even if the two subsystems were equivalent in speed.
I am also wondering if the much larger icon size and desktop size due to Retina display will gobble up more ram. Even with the video card handling graphics duties, the CPU still has to manage the gui items. And then there is graphics switching going on too.
Even if your applications dont "need" more than 8gb of ram, the system will cache more recently accessed files and code libraries. This will return a "fetch" faster than if the system has to go all the way to the SSD for the data. SSD is fast, but not as fast as DDR1600. Also recall that the memory controller is on the CPU for these chips. The SSD is controlled by the chipset. So that introduces latency even if the two subsystems were equivalent in speed.
I am also wondering if the much larger icon size and desktop size due to Retina display will gobble up more ram. Even with the video card handling graphics duties, the CPU still has to manage the gui items. And then there is graphics switching going on too.