Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
The 12" iPad Pro doesn't have a toggle to switch the true tone on/off as far as I can tell. I know there is an option on the new 10" iPad to enable or disable the true tone but the 12" iPad doesn't have that switch.
Maybe that's because the big iPP doesn't have true tone?
 
On the same note, just cause someone can afford it does not make it better. Why assume that people that are critical .....cannot afford it? Silly.

For me the price is not an issue at all. Stupid protruding lens on a device that is suppose to be lying on its back is the deal breaker. Even if it cost 1/2 of the air 2 that is daft to me and I would not buy it, bad design.


Bingo. It is silly. As silly as assuming that people supporting it are "desperate"
 
  • Like
Reactions: CE3
When I had the Pro, there was really no visible difference between its display and my Air 2.

Same for me too. I have (had) both the 12.9 and 9.7. I returned the 9.7 iPad Pro. My iPad Air 2 Display seems very close and I personally was not a fan of the true tone display.
 
$100 for A9X SoC and improved graphics, quad-speaker system, Apple Pencil capability, Smart Connector for Apple keyboard, best display in the industry PERIOD, SSD-based memory controller for incredible read/write flash storage performance, 12MP camera with True Tone flash, 5MP front camera with Retina flash display...

And this doesn't justify $100 more???

Get off your high horse.
I agree 100%. This is called an iPad Pro for a reason. The pros who need these features in a standard sized iPad will be all over this. Does the average consumer need all of this? Well A9X maybe but all of the rest, no, if you are only consuming data. The pros will pay the $100 more for this and see that it is monet well spent.
 
  • Like
Reactions: MagMan1979
Great LCD display? Certainly.

Better than OLED displays? No.

Best tablet display? No.
Better than some OLEDs? Yes.

It's important to point out that LCD/OLED/Whatever, its a MASSIVE range of quality and specifications depending one what specific panel is used.
 
  • Like
Reactions: blackcrayon
I whole heartily disagree:

1) Pencil support is worthless w/o an additional $100 Apple Pencil. Further, it's to Apple advantage to encourage users to buy another accessory. Why should any owner have to foot the bill to include support? That cost should at least be sunk into the cost of the pencil, not the device, unless Apple is going to open the feature up to 3rd party manufacturers -- then put the tax on the 3rd parties who can then push it off on consumers through their product.

Imagine if Apple included camera flash support in iPhones, but not the flash itself -- that was an extra $100. Would you be cheering how awesome the iPhone was because it could support a camera flash?

2) Keyboard support: Honestly? Before Apple made keyboards a jillion and one other companies did. There is nothing wrong with a b/t keyboards that pre-date the Smart Connector. And again, Smart Connector benefits Apple mostly.

3) Better speakers: "Better," is a meaningly term here. They are still button sized. I don't think anyone is going to give a presentation on their iPad with these speakers, better that they may be. The Air 2 speakers are not that great. Apple owed it to customers to do better. But bottom line here is that speakers cost pennies. I don't see where a $100 bump comes into play.

4) More base storage? Only if you are a Kool-Aid drinker. The previous $599 Air 2 WiFi model had 64GB. So for the same $599 consumers are losing 32GB. Keep in mind the wholesale cost difference between 32GB and 64GB is $1 or so.

5) Best screen anywhere. As I previously said, the screen on the iPad 3 was miles ahead of the iPad 2's screen and there was no price increase. So I'm not sure you how justify a price hike from a good retina screen to a better one when Apple didn't raise prices from non-retina to retina.

Pencil support requires a significant rework of the display stack and given how good Apple's implementation is, it's worth the $100 ($200 with the separate pencil purchase) alone because there is NO other stylus on the market that performs like this.

Bluetooth keyboards suck. I've owned a bunch of them. They are all heavy - typically as heavy as the iPad if not heavier. There is often lag with fast typing. You have to charge them. And even the extremely expensive ones tend to break at the hinges after a few months of regular use because a hinge that is durable enough to be used like a laptop is a lot bigger engineering challenge than these companies are up for at least at the price points they are looking to hit.

The Pro/non-Pro lineup for the iPads is clear. If you want Pencil and native keyboard support, and the best of all other features, you get the Pro. If not, you get the Air or the Mini. Nobody is complaining that the MacBook Pro is more expensive than the MacBook Air or that Apple is doing anything fishy there. Time to get over it.
 
I used it for about 20 minutes. The display is nicer than the Air 2. I would come nowhere close to saying it's a "significant upgrade". IMO marginally better is a more accurate description.
 
Apple improves the screen technology in the new iPad Pro such that the professionals at DisplayMate say, "The display on the iPad Pro 9.7 is a Truly Impressive Top Performing Display and a major upgrade to the display on the iPad Air 2. It is by far the best performing mobile LCD display that we have ever tested, and it breaks many display performance records."

And yet, most of the comments regarding this notable achievement are negative. Sometimes I just don't understand people.
I agree. This screen is objectively (in many categories) to be the best mobile screen in the world. In some categories this is the best screen in the world. This screen is the new standard.
 
I agree. This screen is objectively (in many categories) to be the best mobile screen in the world. In some categories this is the best screen in the world. This screen is the new standard.

New standard for LCD displays, we all know OLED tops it and the Galaxy tab S still has the best tablet display ever and it was released in 2014.
 
On the same note, just cause someone can afford it does not make it better. Why assume that people that are critical .....cannot afford it? Silly.

For me the price is not an issue at all. Stupid protruding lens on a device that is suppose to be lying on its back is the deal breaker. Even if it cost 1/2 of the air 2 that is daft to me and I would not buy it, bad design.

The camera doesn't make it rock or anything while on its back, just so you know. You won't notice it at all.
 
While impressive, the screen improvements don't justify an upgrade form an iPad Air 2.

I haven't seen a single improvement to the iPad Pro that makes it worth $100 more than previous models when they launched. The sprinkling of Pro-like features is scarce enough that the "Pro" label on the device is overstating it's capabilities.

I continue to say iPad is the best tablet line out there and if getting a new tablet the iPad Pro is the best you can get. If upgrading, consider waiting unless you got a mansion full of money to blow.

At this time I'm not planning on getting an iPhone 7. I'm more likely to get an iPhone 7S in 2017. But I'm happy to see continued improvements that will make the phone experience better.
 
Pencil support requires a significant rework of the display stack and given how good Apple's implementation is, it's worth the $100 ($200 with the separate pencil purchase) alone because there is NO other stylus on the market that performs like this.

Bluetooth keyboards suck. I've owned a bunch of them. They are all heavy - typically as heavy as the iPad if not heavier. There is often lag with fast typing. You have to charge them. And even the extremely expensive ones tend to break at the hinges after a few months of regular use because a hinge that is durable enough to be used like a laptop is a lot bigger engineering challenge than these companies are up for at least at the price points they are looking to hit.

The Pro/non-Pro lineup for the iPads is clear. If you want Pencil and native keyboard support, and the best of all other features, you get the Pro. If not, you get the Air or the Mini. Nobody is complaining that the MacBook Pro is more expensive than the MacBook Air or that Apple is doing anything fishy there. Time to get over it.

I'm not suggesting that either the Pencil or Smart Connector isn't great technology, but rather t's a tough sell charging extra (over the previous 9.7 flagship MSRP) for mere support and little else. Apple's margins on iPad are quite healthy even if they have to bear an extra buck or two building in support for their own proprietary peripherals. And certainly it will make that back and then some selling Pencils and keyboards.

And the comparison b/t the laptop lines is misplaced too. I'm not comparing unlike product w/ unlike products like MB vs MBP. I'm comparing last years 9.7 flagship with this years 9.7 flagship. Go back to my original post for reference as to why the Pro 9.7 doesn't merit a $100 price increase IMHO.
 
i came to the 9.7 pro from an iPad 3. after 4 years and 3 models in between, i would characterize the quality difference as "barely noticeable"

thats not to say it isn't a fine display, and i'm sure there are measuring devices that highlight the improvements, but to the casual viewer i wouldn't say its anything to clamour over.

also, all these supposed colour space improvements, and yet the main thing people notice, be it a yellow, blue, purple or green colour cast (even with true tone disabled), are generally cited as "pickiness, acceptable manufacturing tolerances, etc..."

The fact people complain about the color says more about people being used to the bluish tint of most LCD, especially TV's and screens. They complain the same when I switch them from standard to movie movie on their TV (or if they see mine that is properly calibrated). They often find it too

The casual viewers watch low rez crap on their phones, they're not a discerning bunch and for them, the Air 2 is AOK.
They often can't really discern bad contrast, bad colors (they bought badly over saturated screens for years), bad everything. They barely can see the difference between SD and HD.

That's why Apple had problem getting them to upgrade and making an Air 3 with a slightly better everything (but no true tone and pen support), would have been pointless for those people who are still happy with their Ipad 2.
[doublepost=1460490839][/doublepost]
While impressive, the screen improvements don't justify an upgrade form an iPad Air 2.

I haven't seen a single improvement to the iPad Pro that makes it worth $100 more than previous models when they launched. The sprinkling of Pro-like features is scarce enough that the "Pro" label on the device is overstating it's capabilities.

I continue to say iPad is the best tablet line out there and if getting a new tablet the iPad Pro is the best you can get. If upgrading, consider waiting unless you got a mansion full of money to blow.

At this time I'm not planning on getting an iPhone 7. I'm more likely to get an iPhone 7S in 2017. But I'm happy to see continued improvements that will make the phone experience better.

What a pointless post. What is your point? That paying $.30 a day extra to get the pro if you keep it 3 years, needs a mansion? A device that's much cheaper than the C64 was (50% less when inflation adjusted), without a screen and tape deck that millions bought (all mansion dwellers I guess).

Your own assessment, especially about the economic of this, are pretty weak.

Considering it's marketed to those that are ready pay that "high" quarter a day price for this privilege, it's even more ludicrous.
 
I'm just here to say: "I WANT NEW THINGS AND I DONT WANT TO PAY FOR THEM!"

serious whats wrong with you people. if you dont think you're able to spend 100 bucks for the extra features, then save yourself some dough and by an Air 2, which they even dropped in price. whats the freaking problem?

if you already have an Air 2, why in gods name do you believe you're supposed to upgrade it? it works fine.
 
[doublepost=1460490839][/doublepost]

What a pointless post. What is your point? That paying $.30 a day extra to get the pro if you keep it 3 years, needs a mansion? A device that's much cheaper than the C64 was (50% less when inflation adjusted), without a screen and tape deck that millions bought (all mansion dwellers I guess).

Your own assessment, especially about the economic of this, are pretty weak.

Considering it's marketed to those that are ready pay that "high" quarter a day price for this privilege, it's even more ludicrous.

Anybody who buys a new tablet every year has extra money laying around to do so or they are putting themselves in debt. Ita not that someone needs a mansion. It's that it's a big waste of money for the minor updates between years.

Wtf cares about a quarter a day price? Ok. The iPad is the high end of tablets. But that doesn't mean iPad customers should be expected to spend more. The industry just forces them to and so the numbers show that people are willing to spend and the indiustry spins it like a want.

Plainly stated my post is to say upgrade only if you have money to waste. Buy if you have the money and wand the best tablet on the market.

Wtf are you judging the worth of my post? Get outta here with that ********.
 
  • Like
Reactions: AppleScruff1
i'm not sure if anyone else can answer this... but... heres the thing. I bought the ipad pro 9.7. I bought the 128gb, but returned it a week later for the 256gb.

When i was using the 128gb ipad pro 9.7, the screen's glass felt really sticky. It was REALLY rough, and can barely swipe anything without the feeling of your finger being sticky. I thought it was a 'NEW ipad' thing that goes away after a bit of use. However, it would not go away. After a few days of heavy use, and looking absolutely ugly with finger prints and dust, i cleaned it with a micro fibre cloth (no liquid) and was still really sticky. In the end, no matter how much i cleaned it, it just wouldn't get clean. It felt like a really rough surface.

I returned it for a 256gb, and already have a screen protector ready to put on. I have one for my iphone, and feels absolutely amazing. Easy to clean, and feels like really nice smooth glass. Anyways, i opened up the new 256gb ipad, and omg the screen feels absolutely different. It felt like my iphone 6 plus screen. Or normal glass screens on devices. I thought the new non-reflective screen tech was what made it feel ******, but wasn't. The screen looks exactly the same, after some test in regards to reflectivity, quality, and usage. I could find nothing different. However, the screen is easy to clean, i can wipe dust and finger prints off easily, and my fingerprints dont smudge on the screen as easily too.

Does anyone know why? My bro's ipad pro 12" has the same sticky ****** screen, where he ended up getting a screen protector to make it no so sticky too. I also tried an ipad air 2 before and had the same ****** screen, but returned it due to the speakers giving me a headache.

PS. Despite what people say, i love the ipad pro 9.7. I mean, i'm still a little pissed off about a few things, like no USB 3 for the lightning port, and costing more than usual. However, i'm upgrading from an ipad 3rd gen (the first retina ipad) and its a HUGE upgrade for me. I already had money saved up for w/e 9.7 ipad that was being released this year.
 
While impressive, the screen improvements don't justify an upgrade form an iPad Air 2.

I haven't seen a single improvement to the iPad Pro that makes it worth $100 more than previous models when they launched. The sprinkling of Pro-like features is scarce enough that the "Pro" label on the device is overstating it's capabilities.

I continue to say iPad is the best tablet line out there and if getting a new tablet the iPad Pro is the best you can get. If upgrading, consider waiting unless you got a mansion full of money to blow.

At this time I'm not planning on getting an iPhone 7. I'm more likely to get an iPhone 7S in 2017. But I'm happy to see continued improvements that will make the phone experience better.

I definitely agree with your first point. If you're coming from the Air models, the display alone is not a reason to upgrade at all. However, if you draw, design, or take notes and want to use one of the best styluses on the market, it's a great update. If you make music, listen to music, or watch lots of video on your iPad and want better stock speakers, it's a great update. If you don't have a 6S, or just want a better camera and 4K video options on your iPad, it's a great update. And while the Air 2 is no slouch, if you want a faster processor, it's a good update.

Whether or not it's worth the extra $ or waiting a few months for discounts and sales to appear is for the individual to decide.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Tycho24
That is great. Now I can view my loRes photos from my iPhone 4S with even more pixelation resolution.

How is that?
Did you miss the part that this has the EXACT same resolution as the 3rd gen iPad, the 4th gen iPad, the iPad Air & the iPad Air 2?

Your "joke" fell REALLY flat.
 
Speaking to a friend who works at flagship Apple store, the new iPad "pro" sales not doing well at all. Lack of innovation and £100 price hike taking its effect. Shame
 
Need a really good docking station with Large battery. Otherwise I will continue to use my Macbook Pro 17" with 16 gigs, 1 TB SSd, non-glare screen. Would buy larger iPad. Also, should have phone capabilities. And for God's sake, a cassette player built in for all us old guys. A built-in mirror to see what's sneaking up on you from behind. A lease plan similar to iPhone program. After 2 years I would want a new one.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.