Sidebar Sidebar
Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

Other A proxy to fix HTTPS issues on old versions of OS X

Macbookprodude said:
Does this work on Mojave ?
Click to expand...
It might work on Mojave—I think I ultimately decided against specifying a maximum OS, although I might be remembering wrong—but it is completely untested on anything newer than Mavericks.

May I ask why you'd want this on Mojave? 10.14 is still officially supported by Apple, and should be many years away from having https problems.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Strategia
Wowfunhappy said:
It might work on Mojave—I think I ultimately decided against specifying a maximum OS, although I might be remembering wrong—but it is completely untested on anything newer than Mavericks.

May I ask why you'd want this on Mojave? 10.14 is still officially supported by Apple, and should be many years away from having https problems.
Click to expand...
@Macbookprodude Perhaps a valid reason for using Squid is that proxying the traffic might improve it in some places and make connections faster. I experienced that myself: prior to using Squid even when there weren't any SSL issues iTunes and 3rd party apps (e.g. Cyberduck) had unexplainable problems every time they needed Internet access. iTunes (I talked about v. 10) was particularly slow to connect to iTunes Store as if someone would bottleneck the traffic: with that in mind, consider that where I live the Internet connection is one of the fastest in the world. Since the beginning of using Squid, many of these problems disappeared. If my understanding is correct using a proxy is built into any OS and is part of daily networking, so setting it up may be desired in the event such a necessity arises.
 
Last edited:
Well that was a giant waste of time. Although I was eventually able to build and even use Squid on Tiger, it crashes every few times I try to load a web page. Not stable at all. You'd be much better off running Squid on a different computer, and having Tiger connect to that.

Might still try Leopard at some point.
 
Last edited:
Wowfunhappy said:
It might work on Mojave—I think I ultimately decided against specifying a maximum OS, although I might be remembering wrong—but it is completely untested on anything newer than Mavericks.

May I ask why you'd want this on Mojave? 10.14 is still officially supported by Apple, and should be many years away from having https problems.
Click to expand...
Because as of now I am using the mac pro to try and set it up as proxy server, so i can use os 9.
 
Macbookprodude said:
Because as of now I am using the mac pro to try and set it up as proxy server, so i can use os 9.
Click to expand...
Ah, that makes much more sense! And I'd like to support that use case too.

Can you try it and let me know what happens? If it's outright blocked in the installer, I'll make sure to remove it next time I update it, possibly tomorrow. But I'll need testing help either way, because I can't virtualize an OS that recent from back here on 10.9. :3
 
Last edited:
Wowfunhappy said:
Ah, that makes much more sense! And I'd like to support that use case too.

Can you try it and let me know what happens? If it's outright blocked in the installer, I'll make sure to remove it next time I update it, possibly tomorrow. But I'll need testing help either way, because I can't visualize an OS that recent from 10.9. :3
Click to expand...
Well, I need to know what proxy server app to use ?
 
@Wowfunhappy : Well... progress with Leopard. It doesn't crash, and it does work, but i'm running in to a high cpu use issue. It's fine until i load a page or 2, then it spikes to 100% and stays there. Maybe you'll have better luck. Maybe my config is wrong. I did try on tiger as well, but as you mentioned it crashes almost instantly. So if we can get it stable on Leopard it does make leopard-webkit almost 100% usable again.

EDIT: Sweet. It was my config. I copied yours and edited it to point to /opt/local instead and it works great. Now we just need you to build it and package it with a nice installer like you did for early Intels. :)

squid-leopard-ppc.png
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: RogerWilco6502 and Amethyst1
wicknix said:
Well... progress with Leopard. It doesn't crash, and it does work.
Click to expand...
Great, glad to know it works!

Yes I will package, I got as far as getting a Leopard VM set up, but work has been busy and I spent last weekend on something else. But I want to make a universal binary!

I'm also really glad you were able to copy the config. You should be able to use that on all sorts of devices, with minor tweaks. When I initially suggested @Macbookprodude could use Squid for Mac OS 9 in the other thread, I didn't necessarily mean this package specifically—you could stick Squid on a Raspberry Pi and proxy through that!
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: wicknix and RogerWilco6502
vorob said:
Just tested on my mbp 2006 with 10.9, and it works. Thank you!View attachment 1739408
Click to expand...

Wonderful, glad to hear!

Just as a general note, outside of limited testing pretty please don't use this proxy to browse the web in Safari, at least not with Javascript turned on. Using a vulnerable web browser on a vulnerable OS is a bad idea, you need to have security somewhere in the chain. 🙂 Use a browser like Chromium Legacy instead!

Where this proxy is super useful is for other internet-enabled apps—Dictionary, NetNewsWire, QuickTime Player, etc!
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Amethyst1
Anyone have a clever name for this package? Trying to improve the overall presentation as I finish up this big update, and the name is vexing me!
 
Last edited:
Nobody actually cares but I need to vent somewhere, that I've officially decided I do not like compiling things on Leopard Intel. :mad:

So much stuff is subtly broken. Hopefully the MacPorts developers haven't gotten tired of my tickets yet...
 
Okay, I'm giving up on Intel Leopard support.
 
Last edited:
An updated download is (finally) in the first post. Changes include:
  • The underlying version of Squid has been updated to 4.14.
  • Add support for 32-bit versions of Snow Leopard.
  • You can now uncomment a single line in squid.conf to allow other computers on your network to use the proxy. Potentially useful for e.g. Mac OS 9.
  • The package can be installed on macOS 10.14 and above (untested).
  • The Dictionary patch works with Lion and Mountain Lion.
  • Build instructions are included.
Technically, this release also includes PowerPC support, but I've been told it does not actually work on real PPC hardware. I don't know why, and I'm more than a little annoyed about it!

If you install this over a previous version, remember to delete the old Squid certificate from keychain access first, and to reboot after installing.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: otetzone
Everything works fine except some weird bug in the Dictionary.app. It shows a restriction sign on its icon and when being opened it returns "You can't open the application Dictionary.app because it may be damaged or incomplete."
MBP 2012 OS X 10.9.5
Here's the log from Console, ~/Library/Logs - DiagnosticReports:

0x7fff85aa4000 - 0x7fff85acdfff com.apple.DictionaryServices (1.2 - 208) <A539A058-BA57-35EE-AA08-D0B0E835127D> /System/Library/Frameworks/CoreServices.framework/Versions/A/Frameworks/DictionaryServices.framework/Versions/A/DictionaryServices
 
otetzone said:
Everything works fine except some weird bug in the Dictionary.app. It shows a restriction sign on its icon and when being opened it returns "You can't open the application Dictionary.app because it may be damaged or incomplete."
MBP 2012 OS X 10.9.5
Here's the log from Console, ~/Library/Logs - DiagnosticReports:

0x7fff85aa4000 - 0x7fff85acdfff com.apple.DictionaryServices (1.2 - 208) <A539A058-BA57-35EE-AA08-D0B0E835127D> /System/Library/Frameworks/CoreServices.framework/Versions/A/Frameworks/DictionaryServices.framework/Versions/A/DictionaryServices
Click to expand...
Thanks, can you tell me what is in Dictionary.app/Contents/MacOS/ ?

Then, restore the app from a backup. I think I know what I did wrong.
 
Wowfunhappy said:
Thanks, can you tell me what is in Dictionary.app/Contents/MacOS/ ?

Then, restore the app from a backup. I think I know what I did wrong.
Click to expand...
Sure. There's an Unix Executable File called Dictionary_backup. And that's it.
You mean a Time Machine backup I figure.
 
otetzone said:
Sure. There's an Unix Executable File called Dictionary_backup. And that's it.
You mean a Time Machine backup I figure.
Click to expand...
Yep, just restore the original Dictionary app from Time Machine. And I'll fix the package so it won't try to patch a copy of the dictionary app that has already been patched previously (the source of the problem).

Edit: Bug fixed. (But otetzone, you'll still need to restore from Time Machine.)
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: otetzone
You must log in or register to reply here.
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.
Top Bottom
Back