Disappointing if true.
I'd be shocked if it was true for all models.
Besides the board pictured means nothing really, it could be an engineering sample or a development platform.
Disappointing if true.
hahaha. oh jeeze. nobody told, you, huh? you dont need to close programs to "speed up" your iphone. thats an absolute myth. the system auto-suspends background apps w/ the exception of music/location processes. your manual closing does absolutely nothing except make you feel better.
but dont take it from me. take it from people who know more than you do:
http://www.speirs.org/blog/2012/1/2/misconceptions-about-ios-multitasking.html
http://daringfireball.net/2012/01/ios_multitasking
It's not going to change anything.
Computers have reached an upper limit on resource requirements. That's why CPUs are about the same speed now as they were 10 years ago.
The only difference now is the lower power.
Get used to 1GB for phones. You're going to be seeing it for the next 10 years.
So it's not a problem as long as you limit yourself to "one or two" tabs? LOL. Problem solved!I'll add my anecdote: my Air has never had a problem keeping all my tabs. More than one or two for sure.
I'm surprised at how many MR posters still care so much about specs cos as seasoned Apple users, I would've thought they would know by now that better specs does not always equal a better UX.
Case in point, my sister's Note and my HTC both have better specs than my iPhone 5S, but you'd never know it cos they feel less responsive and the lag is noticeable. And I've never met an iPhone user who complained about the lack of RAM in his/her device.
The iPad OTOH... I would agree that more RAM would noticeably improve the UX... better web browsing experience and allow for more sophisticated apps and better looking games which would more than offset the slight decrease in battery life IMO.
I'm surprised at how many MR posters still care so much about specs cos as seasoned Apple users, I would've thought they would know by now that better specs does not always equal a better UX.
The iPad ... I would agree that more RAM would noticeably improve the UX... better web browsing experience and allow for more sophisticated apps and better looking games which would more than offset the slight decrease in battery life IMO.
The larger machine might come with 4GB to cover all those pixels.From my experience, I think the device can handle adequately one OS update and not much more. It would then run into performance issues and frequent crashes. For those of us have the iPhone 5, it came with the iOS 6 and then I updated to iOS 7. With iOS 7, there was more of a RAM hit for sure, but it was ok. However, I expect a lot more sucking of RAM with iOS 8. That's why I said to myself I won't update the iOS than 7.1.3.
Nonetheless, I imagine not everyone has 133 apps on their device like I do so this may not be an issue for those who run very few apps.
As a possible thought, maybe the 4.7 inch iPhone will be the low end model and the upcoming 5.5+ inch model will be the higher end and that's where you definitely would need the extra RAM ro run the larger screen.
For Apple not to double the RAM two years after introducing the iPhone 5 with 1 GB RAM would simple be baffling. In any event, form most consumers, they won't know about the RAM or care much about it. Their focus will be on whether they should get the 16 32, 64, or 128 GB model.
Oh no, your browser reloaded? Thats awful! #1stworldproblems
Please, go buy an Android phone with 48 cores and 24GB of RAM. If all of you guys would do this, I wouldn't have to stand in line for hours on launch day! Win-win!
Fine by me! Ive never once had a memory issue with any of my iDevices including the iPhone. People who feel the need to have 16 browser tabs and 42 apps all open at the same time on their PHONE are absurd and need to buy a tablet or a laptop.
I don't care what the RAM is. It's a spec number--a marketing point.
I care how well the device performs, and what battery life it gets.
More RAM helps performance (in some cases: reloading stuff into RAM less) but software efficiency to NEED less RAM can achieve the same kinds of benefit.
More RAM hurts battery life (all other things being equal) but software efficiency to NEED less battery can help.
There's a balance: the most efficient OS, tools to make 3rd party apps the most efficient, the least power-hungry hardware, and just the right amount of RAM.
Where is that balance?
I won't pretend to know. But I also won't assume that other phone makers have the ideal balance (they can't even do what Apple can with the OS).
I hope Apple has found a good balance for each device. Only tests will tell us: how well does this device perform? What battery life does it get?
THAT is what matters. Not a number alone.
I'll add my anecdote: my Air has never had a problem keeping all my tabs. More than one or two for sure. (I'll also add that I wouldn't much care if it DID have that limit: I occasionally use tons of tabs to "save something for later" in a lazy/easy way. I don't care if one of those old tabs takes 1 second to refresh when I finally get back to it. The number of tabs I'm actually using NOW, at a given moment, switching back and forth, is more like 2 to 4.)
That said, the iPad has battery to spare, so why not go for more RAM there? I don't object to 1GB on the phone, but I'll support those who complain if the iPad doesn't get more. I'll be surprised if it doesn't.
EDIT: I also can see merit in the future-proofing argumentgiving us MORE RAM than most people need could well be a benefit some future day. However:
- You still suffer the reduced battery life now, and forever. There's no free lunch. Less RAM = more battery time. (I'd be curious to know how much, but am led to believe from tech podcasts that it's a significant drain from some phones.)
- Some developers will be "lazy" about USING more RAM (even if not really needed) and then you're right back where you started. It could help them (which isn't all bad) more than it helps you the user.
- If people are comparing Apple RAM to other companies' RAM... then they'd better not bring up future-proofing because Android devices get abandoned before you're done with your 2-year contract! We can say iOS 9 or 10 would probably benefit from some RAM "elbow room." We can't say that your new Android phone will see much benefit from 2 to 3 major releases of Android into the future: you probably won't ever get it!
Apple had an all-time R&D spending record last quarter.
So it's not a problem as long as you limit yourself to "one or two" tabs? LOL. Problem solved!
I currently have 33 tabs open on my iPad air and can still open up more tabs.
I currently have 33 tabs open on my iPad air and can still open up more tabs.
Funny to see people criticize products they don't even have or use.
Ios 8 beta 5
iPad Air.
I currently have 33 tabs open on my iPad air and can still open up more tabs.
Funny to see people criticize products they don't even have or use.
Ios 8 beta 5
iPad Air.
I currently have 33 tabs open on my iPad air and can still open up more tabs.
Funny to see people criticize products they don't even have or use.
Ios 8 beta 5
iPad Air.
I currently have 33 tabs open on my iPad air and can still open up more tabs.
Funny to see people criticize products they don't even have or use.
Ios 8 beta 5
iPad Air.
I'm not convinced that the image shown even indicates that the iPhone 6 will have 1GB of RAM.
From what I see on the image, this is what is printed:
H9CKNNN_KTMR_R
Now, let's compare this against the below:
http://www.skhynix.com/products/mob...nfo.ramKind=33&info.eol=NOT&posMap=MobileDDR3
1) H9CCNNN4GTMLAR (4Gb = 512MB)
2) H9CCNNN8JTALAR (8Gb = 1GB)
3) H9CCNNN8KTALBR (8Gb = 1GB)
4) H9CKNNN8GTMPLR (8Gb = 1GB)
5) H9CCNNNBLTALAR (16Gb = 2GB)
6) H9CCNNNBPTALBR (16Gb = 2GB)
7) H9CKNNNBJTMPLR (16Gb = 2GB)
8) H9CKNNNBKTMRPR (16Gb = 2GB)
9) H9CKNNNBKTMTDR (16Gb = 2GB)
10) H9CKNNNBPTATDR (16Gb = 2GB)
11) H9CKNNNDATMRPR (24Gb = 3GB)
12) H9CKNNNDATMTDR (24Gb = 3GB)
Row's 1-3 and 5-6 can be eliminated since they start as "H9CCNNN..." rather than the 'H9CKNNN...' we are looking for.
So far this leaves the following:
4) H9CKNNN8GTMPLR (8Gb = 1GB)
7) H9CKNNNBJTMPLR (16Gb = 2GB)
8) H9CKNNNBKTMRPR (16Gb = 2GB)
9) H9CKNNNBKTMTDR (16Gb = 2GB)
10) H9CKNNNBPTATDR (16Gb = 2GB)
11) H9CKNNNDATMRPR (24Gb = 3GB)
12) H9CKNNNDATMTDR (24Gb = 3GB)
After the 1st letter in question (8 or is it a B?), the sequence continues with what looks to be "KTM", so let's look at what that leaves us: Lines 7, and 10-12 can be removed as well, so we now have this left:
4) H9CKNNN8GTMPLR (8Gb = 1GB)
8) H9CKNNNBKTMRPR (16Gb = 2GB)
9) H9CKNNNBKTMTDR (16Gb = 2GB)
Looking at the remaining three digits, it looks like R_R (looks like a 'W' in between, but that doesn't match up with anything above), so looking at what we are left with, we just have:
8) H9CKNNNBKTMRPR (16Gb = 2GB)
The above leads me to believe that the iPhone 6 will indeed have 2GB of RAM; and continues the "tradition" of doubling/increasing RAM every form factor change. I don't know why it looks like a 'W' in the pictures, as opposed to a 'P' above, but this is what I have so far.
The above makes sense to me, but let me know if someone sees anything I may have done wrong.
I used "face palm" too early -_-
Look up IPC and quantum tunneling. Also, read about transistors and how they get hotter as the node shrinks and number of transitions increases. Oh, and 3D chip manufacturing processes and heterogeneous computing (think OpenCL).
Also, computers don't use resources, OS's do.
After all that, tell your mom to slap you for the last 2 sentences you wrote.
You miss the point. If you open say...4 to 5 tabs on Chrome, and you start switching between those tabs, you will find that the Chrome is reloading the contents when you click on the tab again. If your phone have enough memory, it shouldn't need to reload anything.
That is one of the MOST annoying "feature" on iphone.
In fact, I am starting to suspect whether if iphone 6 will have enough memory for me to play H265 encoded movie. If iphone 6 only have 1G ram and no higher end model have an option with 2G ram, this is REALLY bad for a techie user.
I agree with you here. I can see that happening, to an extent. Although its a much different discussion for the iPhone than for the iPad. I just don't see iPhones being meant as a platform for cutting edge games. The iPad, yes. And a lot of comments I have read here today are from people that have said they are willing to give Apple more of a pass in re the iPhone than they are the iPad. Seems crazy that te iPad would not have more.