I'm not a fan of Tim, but looking at their upper management team, who's better? I can't see anyone; the last thing Apple needs is someone worse in charge.
Sure....freak everybody out...Great job man
I'm not a fan of Tim, but looking at their upper management team, who's better? I can't see anyone; the last thing Apple needs is someone worse in charge.
How was blaming China dishonest when the Chinese market is the problem?Blaming the Chinese market seems nothing less than dishonest.
The problems are self-incurred by its outrageous pricing and really, really stupid marketing decisions (soldered-on RAM and SSDs).
You can screw all people for some time, and some people all the time, but not all people all the time.
I agree in that Mr. Cook should step back. The bean counters and marketing guys are way to powerful within Apple imo. An innovation-driven company like Apple should be headed by a nerd (kinda like Jobs himself was), ideally a computer scientist. Amongst the Apple execs Craig Federighi seems best suited.
Anyway, no bean counters or marketing personnel, please, those are the ones that put Apple in this position. Eerily, Jobs predicted this would happen sooner or later
There were plenty of build quality problems under Steve Jobs too. It’s just Apple wasn’t nearly as big as it is now and social media didn’t exist to amplify things.It is more about reality and bad decision making than simple math.
1. The build quality of apple had used to be superior, but there is no evidence that is still the case, under Tim. The keyboard failing in MacBook pro's, the MacBook pro's unable to run at advertised speeds due to bad design, batteries were not replaced by generosity, the iMac mini starting at 800 despite having no new tech, no longer having a graphics cards and a low end processor (there are videos showing how to build a better version that runs mac os for under $300), bent iPads etc etc etc etc
Just like my bank account after christmas...
Because the Chinese market really isn't the problem, at least not the only problem. Its the prices going up unreasonably across the whole product line. Its users being disgruntled with soldered on SSDs and RAM (not to forget glued on batteries.). Lack of interfaces (USB A. SD Card). Going backwards at times (Mag Safe).How was blaming China dishonest when the Chinese market is the problem?
Come on, we have the first openly gay CEO, that's important! Go Tim! Diversity and inclusion.
Apple used to be so incredibly thoughtful— Even the unboxing was exciting because Apple packaged its products in novel ways like a bento box of thoughtful design.
I don’t know if that user-centric thinking is as in evidence today. FaceID is not good if you’re in a business meeting or at a dinner and you want discreetly to check your phone on the fly.
The design of the MPB, while sleek elegant and killer in its day, doesn’t work with the reality of current super hot chips.
The MBP bar thingie is not more useful than function keys.
iTunes has become a mystery beyond mastery when it comes to simply using it (in my opinion).
Apple used to be like a high end hotel, full of thoughtful luxury user details. You pay a lot but you’re taken care of. You don’t have to buy dongles. You can upgrade your room later if you desire. You have the best view with everything right where you need it and can find it.
I actually don’t think apple’s prices are too high. That’s not the problem. The problem is that they need to focus a bit more on the luxury user experience.
Just one consumer’s opinion!
I’m going to take a guess that Tim Cook knows more what the problem is than you do. You’re basically projecting your gripes on to this announcement when there isn’t hard evidence to support it.Because the Chinese market really isn't the problem, at least not the only problem. Its the prices going up unreasonably across the whole product line. Its users being disgruntled with soldered on SSDs and RAM (not to forget glued on batteries.). Lack of interfaces (USB A. SD Card). Going backwards at times (Mag Safe).
And its the sole focus on iPhone sales while neglecting other product lines, in particular the Mac. Its the lack of diversity. No, this is not about China. Its about failure on the management part, lacking innovation and locking down hardware in an attempt to screw the customer.
The failed revenue target is hardly a surprise. Its actually as expected. And I'd be surprised if this trend would again turn anytime soon
Hard evidence like what?I’m going to take a guess that Tim Cook knows more what the problem is than you do. You’re basically projecting your gripes on to this announcement when there isn’t hard evidence to support it.
Not if that 35% drop was irrational. Nothing has happened to Apple that would justify that drop. Even with this downturn, they absolutely print money. APPL trades at far less than it should based on Apple’s earnings. They are irrationally held to an insane standard that somehow doesn’t apply even to stocks that should be comparable, like Amazon.Don’t worry; the apologists out there will have you believe this is a necessary ‘adjustment’, or simply a small ‘blip’.. if it was any other company they’d be laying of staff left and right after dropping 35% in value!
This forum is a tiny fraction of owners of Apple products.Hard evidence like what?
Sure, its all opinions. Sure, the Chinese market may have left something to be desired.
But if you follow this forum you'll notice: never have there been so many statements actually agreeing on Apple's pricing going astray.
People have been waiting for years for an upgraded Mac mini. People still wait for a decent Mac Pro. Speaking of: the actual Mac Pro is now 5 years old. Now that's unbelievable, don't you think?
There is no doubt that Apple missed to diversify its product line. It was to be expected that the smartphone marked one day reaches saturation. Apple's approach to mitigate this - by increasing prices - clearly failed.
And it seems there is no plan B.
If Tim Cook is so much more knowledgeable - why did this happen? Apple's customer actually beg for product updates, would be willing to spend their money, but Apple denies to deliver. Or delivers products so crippled that even the highly loyal Apple customer denies purchasing.
THAT is evidential.
I tend to believe the numbers posted by Apple indicate that more potential customers follow the path discribed.This forum is a tiny fraction of owners of Apple products.
I've been long in Apple since the mid 1990s, I've made my money several times over even at today's price levels. MacDann
Not true. The 150 mio investment DID NOT SAVE APPLE. It is an often repeated myth - a myth nonetheless. When MS invested, Apple still had about 1.2 bn $ cash reserves and would very likely have survived anyway. (also see https://www.cultofmac.com/567497/microsoft-investment-saves-apple/)You do remember that point in 1997, when–barring a $150 million cash loan from Microsoft that Jobs had to personally ask Gates for–Apple was about to declare bankruptcy? That loan also negotiated away Apple's right to sue Microsoft over macOS copyright infringements. Not exactly a winning position to be in.
no company can innovate around a trade war.
This.
I'm surprised it lasted as long as it did. Tim Cook's Apple, is not the Apple I used to care about, that's for sure.
I’m going to take a guess that Tim Cook knows more what the problem is than you do. You’re basically projecting your gripes on to this announcement when there isn’t hard evidence to support it.
While Greater China and other emerging markets accounted for the vast majority of the year-over-year iPhone revenue decline, in some developed markets, iPhone upgrades also were not as strong as we thought they would be. While macroeconomic challenges in some markets were a key contributor to this trend, we believe there are other factors broadly impacting our iPhone performance, including consumers adapting to a world with fewer carrier subsidies, US dollar strength-related price increases, and some customers taking advantage of significantly reduced pricing for iPhone battery replacements.
I’d be buying shares here.
Apple is spending close to $14B/yr on R&D, including AR and VR.
You would be buying shares if what? If you had money? If you were currently on Earth? If dogs were allowed to make stock purchases?
I would never take investment advice from someone who started a sentence "I'd be buying..."