Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Blaming the Chinese market seems nothing less than dishonest.

The problems are self-incurred by its outrageous pricing and really, really stupid marketing decisions (soldered-on RAM and SSDs).
You can screw all people for some time, and some people all the time, but not all people all the time.

I agree in that Mr. Cook should step back. The bean counters and marketing guys are way to powerful within Apple imo. An innovation-driven company like Apple should be headed by a nerd (kinda like Jobs himself was), ideally a computer scientist. Amongst the Apple execs Craig Federighi seems best suited.

Anyway, no bean counters or marketing personnel, please, those are the ones that put Apple in this position. Eerily, Jobs predicted this would happen sooner or later
How was blaming China dishonest when the Chinese market is the problem?
 
It is more about reality and bad decision making than simple math.

1. The build quality of apple had used to be superior, but there is no evidence that is still the case, under Tim. The keyboard failing in MacBook pro's, the MacBook pro's unable to run at advertised speeds due to bad design, batteries were not replaced by generosity, the iMac mini starting at 800 despite having no new tech, no longer having a graphics cards and a low end processor (there are videos showing how to build a better version that runs mac os for under $300), bent iPads etc etc etc etc
There were plenty of build quality problems under Steve Jobs too. It’s just Apple wasn’t nearly as big as it is now and social media didn’t exist to amplify things.
 
  • Like
Reactions: RandomDSdevel
How was blaming China dishonest when the Chinese market is the problem?
Because the Chinese market really isn't the problem, at least not the only problem. Its the prices going up unreasonably across the whole product line. Its users being disgruntled with soldered on SSDs and RAM (not to forget glued on batteries.). Lack of interfaces (USB A. SD Card). Going backwards at times (Mag Safe).

And its the sole focus on iPhone sales while neglecting other product lines, in particular the Mac. Its the lack of diversity. No, this is not about China. Its about failure on the management part, lacking innovation and locking down hardware in an attempt to screw the customer.

The failed revenue target is hardly a surprise. Its actually as expected. And I'd be surprised if this trend would turn anytime soon
 
Last edited:
Apple used to be so incredibly thoughtful— Even the unboxing was exciting because Apple packaged its products in novel ways like a bento box of thoughtful design.

I don’t know if that user-centric thinking is as in evidence today. FaceID is not good if you’re in a business meeting or at a dinner and you want discreetly to check your phone on the fly.

The design of the MPB, while sleek elegant and killer in its day, doesn’t work with the reality of current super hot chips.

The MBP bar thingie is not more useful than function keys.

iTunes has become a mystery beyond mastery when it comes to simply using it (in my opinion).

Apple used to be like a high end hotel, full of thoughtful luxury user details. You pay a lot but you’re taken care of. You don’t have to buy dongles. You can upgrade your room later if you desire. You have the best view with everything right where you need it and can find it.

I actually don’t think apple’s prices are too high. That’s not the problem. The problem is that they need to focus a bit more on the luxury user experience.

Just one consumer’s opinion!

The quality and innovation is still there. We can't help it if Intel couldn't deliver the cool six core chips we needed. ARM will solve that.

The Touch Bar is used by many people but yeah should be an option.

Apple's prices have risen because they have some smart people who know that we live in volatile times with unhinged politicians. If companies don't keep their profit margin high then they will be hurt by the political shenanigans happening right now. Look how many famous retailers are being damaged.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Ouch, everyone should have seen this coming. When a company makes their most money on smartphones , and less and less people upgrade that device every year. Most people don't upgrade their desktops, laptops, tvs, cars, etc each year. Same is happening now with smartphones as the reasons to upgrade are dwindling especially with the price hikes.


"The company has lost about $450 billion in market value since its peak of about $1.1 trillion last year."
 
Because the Chinese market really isn't the problem, at least not the only problem. Its the prices going up unreasonably across the whole product line. Its users being disgruntled with soldered on SSDs and RAM (not to forget glued on batteries.). Lack of interfaces (USB A. SD Card). Going backwards at times (Mag Safe).

And its the sole focus on iPhone sales while neglecting other product lines, in particular the Mac. Its the lack of diversity. No, this is not about China. Its about failure on the management part, lacking innovation and locking down hardware in an attempt to screw the customer.

The failed revenue target is hardly a surprise. Its actually as expected. And I'd be surprised if this trend would again turn anytime soon
I’m going to take a guess that Tim Cook knows more what the problem is than you do. You’re basically projecting your gripes on to this announcement when there isn’t hard evidence to support it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Abstract
I’m going to take a guess that Tim Cook knows more what the problem is than you do. You’re basically projecting your gripes on to this announcement when there isn’t hard evidence to support it.
Hard evidence like what?

Sure, its all opinions. Sure, the Chinese market may have left something to be desired.

But if you follow this forum you'll notice: never have there been so many statements actually agreeing on Apple's pricing going astray.
People have been waiting for years for an upgraded Mac mini. People still wait for a decent Mac Pro. Speaking of: the actual Mac Pro is now 5 years old. Now that's unbelievable, don't you think?

There is no doubt that Apple missed to diversify its product line. It was to be expected that the smartphone marked one day reaches saturation. Apple's approach to mitigate this - increasing prices - clearly failed.
And it seems there is no plan B.

If Tim Cook is so much more knowledgeable - why did this happen? Apple's customers actually beg for product updates, more than willing to spend their money, but Apple denies to deliver. Or delivers products so crippled that even the highly loyal Apple customer denies purchasing.

THAT is evidential.
 
Last edited:
Don’t worry; the apologists out there will have you believe this is a necessary ‘adjustment’, or simply a small ‘blip’.. if it was any other company they’d be laying of staff left and right after dropping 35% in value!
Not if that 35% drop was irrational. Nothing has happened to Apple that would justify that drop. Even with this downturn, they absolutely print money. APPL trades at far less than it should based on Apple’s earnings. They are irrationally held to an insane standard that somehow doesn’t apply even to stocks that should be comparable, like Amazon.

The news isn’t good, but Apple’s profit in a bad quarter is still the envy of the industry.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Abstract
Hard evidence like what?

Sure, its all opinions. Sure, the Chinese market may have left something to be desired.

But if you follow this forum you'll notice: never have there been so many statements actually agreeing on Apple's pricing going astray.
People have been waiting for years for an upgraded Mac mini. People still wait for a decent Mac Pro. Speaking of: the actual Mac Pro is now 5 years old. Now that's unbelievable, don't you think?

There is no doubt that Apple missed to diversify its product line. It was to be expected that the smartphone marked one day reaches saturation. Apple's approach to mitigate this - by increasing prices - clearly failed.
And it seems there is no plan B.

If Tim Cook is so much more knowledgeable - why did this happen? Apple's customer actually beg for product updates, would be willing to spend their money, but Apple denies to deliver. Or delivers products so crippled that even the highly loyal Apple customer denies purchasing.

THAT is evidential.
This forum is a tiny fraction of owners of Apple products.
 
They're just following the same trend as EVERY company focussing on mandatory 'diversity'. Protip. If you wan't to become a billionaire by the time you retire, make it a habit to short these companies.
 
This forum is a tiny fraction of owners of Apple products.
I tend to believe the numbers posted by Apple indicate that more potential customers follow the path discribed.

Anyway, we'll see what the future brings. My guess is Apple will continue to miss targets unless they fix their products/prices. This should be easy to do, question is if they are willing to...
 
I've been long in Apple since the mid 1990s, I've made my money several times over even at today's price levels. MacDann

You do remember that point in 1997, when–barring a $150 million cash loan from Microsoft that Jobs had to personally ask Gates for–Apple was about to declare bankruptcy? That loan also negotiated away Apple's right to sue Microsoft over macOS copyright infringements. Not exactly a winning position to be in.
 
You do remember that point in 1997, when–barring a $150 million cash loan from Microsoft that Jobs had to personally ask Gates for–Apple was about to declare bankruptcy? That loan also negotiated away Apple's right to sue Microsoft over macOS copyright infringements. Not exactly a winning position to be in.
Not true. The 150 mio investment DID NOT SAVE APPLE. It is an often repeated myth - a myth nonetheless. When MS invested, Apple still had about 1.2 bn $ cash reserves and would very likely have survived anyway. (also see https://www.cultofmac.com/567497/microsoft-investment-saves-apple/)

Steve Jobs later commented that this investment did not save Apple, but it certainly helped by supporting customer trust in the Apple platform (which was SJs intention behind the whole deal in the first place).
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: RandomDSdevel
no company can innovate around a trade war.

Yeah the “trade war” is exactly why me, my wife, my mom, my friend and his wife all didn’t upgrade this year. First time ever we didn’t upgrade after a 2 year cycle.
[doublepost=1546545999][/doublepost]
This.

I'm surprised it lasted as long as it did. Tim Cook's Apple, is not the Apple I used to care about, that's for sure.

I whole heartily agree.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I’m going to take a guess that Tim Cook knows more what the problem is than you do. You’re basically projecting your gripes on to this announcement when there isn’t hard evidence to support it.

Cook gave a whole list of reasons for the revised guidance, it wasn't just China. Lack of carrier subsidy, battery replacement programme and exchange rates were all mentioned.


While Greater China and other emerging markets accounted for the vast majority of the year-over-year iPhone revenue decline, in some developed markets, iPhone upgrades also were not as strong as we thought they would be. While macroeconomic challenges in some markets were a key contributor to this trend, we believe there are other factors broadly impacting our iPhone performance, including consumers adapting to a world with fewer carrier subsidies, US dollar strength-related price increases, and some customers taking advantage of significantly reduced pricing for iPhone battery replacements.

https://www.apple.com/newsroom/2019/01/letter-from-tim-cook-to-apple-investors/
 
Apple is boring. Boring outdated design. Boring tech for a huge premium. Apple's last great phone was 5 series. And last innovative tech was the airpods. Everything else is just catch up.

Apple doesn't have a pricing problem. People will PAY if the product is new/different/innovative/exciting.
Apple has an innovation problem.
 
Apple needs to do something, but what is that something? I haven't heard any great ideas. Lowering iPhone pricing and the need for further services are certainly actions they can (and probably should) take, but nothing that will meaningfully move the needle. There's just no other technology that's ready for prime time for them to shift focus to. AR, VR, self driving cars.... all are years away. PC computers (Mac Pro, iMac, MBP, MBAir, MB) just don't make that much money. 75% of their money comes from an iPhone in a saturated marketplace. They can make it out, but it's going to take multiple products that are lower risk like an actual Apple Television Set, wireless headphones, AirPower, and possibly some smart home stuff (though I'm less bullish on the smart home).
 
  • Like
Reactions: RandomDSdevel
If I I didn't already have several thousand shares and a new purchase of 4 digits pretty recently. I put my money where my mouth is. I bought some shares a little too early, but I have a lot way below $100 too.
You would be buying shares if what? If you had money? If you were currently on Earth? If dogs were allowed to make stock purchases?

I would never take investment advice from someone who started a sentence "I'd be buying..."
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.