Just as a Swiss-knife, it's a great engineering tool, it's really useful, but almost every mini-tool that it has can't be really compared to his full-size counterpart in terms of efficiency, output, ergonomics etc.
I used this exact analogy no more than a week ago. I agree with the philosophy of not trying to cram a bottle-opener onto every tool you design. I do believe that browsers should be browsers (database servers), however I still consider it a slight hindrance that G4's simply cannot handle in-browser media since that will fundamentally BREAK some functions. We can talk all day long about work-arounds but there are certain roadblocks which cannot be overcome without unreasonable effort and knowledge. I'm glad that I do not rely on a G4 now the way I had to ten-years ago. I was aware of the work-arounds and optimizations of the time and they made my G4 useable. Was it easy? No. Flawless? No. Did it ultimately get the job done? It did with a pretty high success rate but not always.
Now that I have every toy in the box, it doesn't matter. The only things I will be doing with the web on the old boxes is collecting antique Mac software directly to skip the step of sneaker-loading the apps. Once I have a home network completely configured, even that step will be effortless.
My biggest hurdle is with my other project. Operation Norge has the goal of relying solely on Leopard on an Intel Mac. Since I'm the only one crazy enough to not "just upgrade to Snow Leopard" I have encountered unique obstacles. There are few to no resources for what I'm trying to do. Once 10.6 came out, Leopard was abandoned completely unless you were on PowerPC. Every issue and shortcoming was slapped away with "Just upgrade!". That is what makes my task so difficult.
Sorry, haven't been reading this thread. What are we trying to track down?
LOL. The down-spiraling digression of an OS 9/Sorbet Leopard thread into my Mac Pro running Leopard forever thread. I was going to get around to asking people if they have any Leopard-compatible Intel software laying around on disks somewhere or the best resources to track them down and most importantly
filter them. I'll reserve the task for
that thread.
I'm taking all of these responses into account. As I learn more about what PowerPC apps have to offer today, I'll be able to give a more fair judgement of what this little machine is capable of.
Before owning this Mini, I've only ever personally experienced one G4 Mini. I repaired and optimized a G4 for a senior in retirement living who only had one computer and wasn't interested in changing. I seemed to recall it was slow and the work-arounds were difficult for the user to fully manage. This device has, so-far, surprised me. Maybe it's just the graphical side of things (twice the VRAM) but I am enjoying the performance and have to thank everybody that suggested the Mini for OS 9. I really feel it is a fantastic compact machine. It may not closely rival a DP PowerMac but it isn't getting winded either.