Hilarious site: http://adobegripes.tumblr.com/
I hope for Adobe's sake they've been following it.
I hope for Adobe's sake they've been following it.
so can i upgrade my academic version of cs4 after effects to the the professional version of after effects cs5 through purchasing the cs5 upgrade disc, or do I have to purchase the full version of CS5??
Any other suggestions?? I just can't get an answer for this question and no one has an answer.
I'm mainly a Lightroom user, but I wouldn't pass up the new raw engine in Photoshop CS5 (which is the same one as in Lightroom 3 Beta 2).I'm a photographer that uses Adobe Photoshop religiously. I think its a great product, but I'm skipping the update this round. It would cost me $199 to upgrade and I really don't see $199 of value in the features that would benefit me.
The content aware filling is cool, but don't know that many times that I would use it. The new features geared for photographers can easily be fixed by having the photographer getting it right in camera in the first place.
That's a win, as far as Apple is concerned.but...but...but... teh code is bad!
Anyway. Can't wait to get my cheap(ish) Masters Collection from school.
Apple will revert the announced changes because of the strong winds blowing into their face.
+1. Obviously, when a company that thrives on premium pricing uses a clearance-sale pricing model on an isolated group of products (Apple's software), people should smell a rat – Apple isn't doing it to be nice. It's simply part of a lock-in strategy; Step 1 – make them switch to Mac, step 2 – offer them Mac-exclusive software like FCS, Logic and iWork and make sure it's way cheaper than cross-platform alternatives like Premiere/AE, Cubase and MS Office. Once the customer is hooked on the Mac-exclusive software, the threshold for returning to Windows is much higher.Adobe doesn't sell computers that help offset the cost of their software develop where as Apple pretty much gives software away to help sell computers. The price point for FCS is completely out of whack compared to the rest of the industry and shouldn't be used as a price measuring stick.
I have been using the Adobe Creative Suite for 12 years now. Adobe is one of the slowest companies to innovate their products. I have rarely (if ever) in the past 12 years seen a new Adobe release and said to myself I HAVE to have the new version, it's so much better.
They have millions of people that use their products everyday, and yet not one of them would tell you that they find Adobe an exciting company to watch and see how they improve their software. Because the truth is, they only make minor improvements. They think they can add on a couple Photoshop filters in 2 years, and wow the world with their new release. It's pretty upsetting, because its 2010 and they can do so much more to innovate in this space.
I still use CS3, and it works OK. I just can't believe its been two releases CS4, and now CS5 and I still don't see any significant changes for me to want to upgrade.
Adobe seriously needs to rethink their software's User Interface elements, and menus.
Thoroughly disappointed with this new release. They need more competition.
Does anyone feel the same way?
Lameass feature. Photoshop sux. Apple could do so much better. The sooner Apple can kill off Adobe the better. Cmon Apple release your Photoshop killer already.
Yeah, well... the problem is that this whole "CS" concept enforces a deadline on all the Adobe teams, no matter where their particular product is in the evolutionary process. Therefore there are always a couple of CS products in each iteration that offer little to nothing new. In CS4, Flash saw some major improvements, but in Dreamweaver there was almost nothing, aside from the CS-wide overhaul of the GUI that is. In CS5 there's tons of new stuff in Photoshop and After Effects, but almost nothing in Flash. If Adobe weren't so hell bent on bundling everything (and the users weren't so hell bent on buying the bundles), each product could evolve at its own pace and be released when it's worthy.I'm not sure what the point of CS4 was..
I agree with you, I'm on CS3, but Content Fill has won my little heart. I'm not sure what the point of CS4 was..
I have been using the Adobe Creative Suite for 12 years now. Adobe is one of the slowest companies to innovate their products. I have rarely (if ever) in the past 12 years seen a new Adobe release and said to myself I HAVE to have the new version, it's so much better.
They have millions of people that use their products everyday, and yet not one of them would tell you that they find Adobe an exciting company to watch and see how they improve their software. Because the truth is, they only make minor improvements. They think they can add on a couple Photoshop filters in 2 years, and wow the world with their new release. It's pretty upsetting, because its 2010 and they can do so much more to innovate in this space.
I still use CS3, and it works OK. I just can't believe its been two releases CS4, and now CS5 and I still don't see any significant changes for me to want to upgrade.
Adobe seriously needs to rethink their software's User Interface elements, and menus.
Thoroughly disappointed with this new release. They need more competition.
Does anyone feel the same way?
Nothing I've read comes close to suggesting Jobs HATES Adobe. The hate is totally misplaced. Adobe & Apple have an odd relationship but they definitely help each other out a lot.
Oh no..! A slightly slow (buggy? though not bad here) flash player which nevertheless performs totally fine on most people's Macs.. Like Apple never release buggy products and take ages to fix them up sometimes.
I checked out the "What's New in Flash Professional CS5" page, and the new additions were so lame it reads more like a maintenance update. New text engine, enhanced ActionScript editor, improved CS integration, ooooooooooh! Let me get my wallet... and use the money for something else.
Some of the CS5 products (such as SoundBooth) remain so unchanged since CS4 they don't even have a "What's New" page(!)
You said it. Adobe barely releases updates to existing programs (Dreamweaver CS4 is still at 10.0) and then 'fixes' them but sprinkles some new features and re-releases it as CS(X). Photoshop obviously gets the bulk of new features but I'd say the neat extraction/scaling would barely be used in my normal daily use. So not a decision maker.
I rely on these programs for a living, so I obviously will have to upgrade eventually, but it would be nice if they even tried to fix existing versions first.
Does anyone if Adobe has officially stated that all of the components of CS5 are written in Cocoa?
Mac OS
- Multicore Intel processor
- Mac OS X v10.5.7 or v10.6
- 1GB of RAM
- 2GB of available hard-disk space for installation; additional free space required during installation (cannot install on a volume that uses a case-sensitive file system or on removable flash-based storage devices)
- 1024x768 display (1280x800 recommended) with qualified hardware-accelerated OpenGL graphics card, 16-bit color, and 256MB of VRAM
- Some GPU-accelerated features require graphics support for Shader Model 3.0 and OpenGL 2.0
- DVD-ROM drive
- QuickTime 7.6.2 software required for multimedia features
- Broadband Internet connection required for online services*
http://www.macnn.com/articles/10/04/12/to.ship.by.end.of.april/
For that kind of money, I was really hoping for full 64bit support across all apps.
Youtube has an html5 beta program. You can see if it helps by trying it out: http://www.youtube.com/html5 It seems to work fine on my powermac g4 (better than the flash version anyway). The controls aren't as nice as the flash version IMHO.
Do some research. Flash Catalyst is a front end UI construction app that let's you take designs from Photoshop, Illustrator, and other CS5 Apps, and convert them into objects and formats for use in Flash, laying them out with the functionality a Designer envisions, and generates the MXML code for it based on these layouts.
This allows Designers to focus on creating the clean front-end UIs, while developers write the code that plugs into them using Flash Builder 4 (formerly Flex Builder 3). This way, Developers have to deal less with the UI itself, and Designers don't have to go through the current process of converting UI assets into SWFs, PNGs, or other visual formats for use in a Flex Application.
The purpose of this? It improves the workflow between designers and developers, allowing designers to make visual changes in Catalyst without damaging code already written by developers in Flash Builder.
If you'd like to take 5 minutes of your precious time to learn more and understand, click here: Exploring Flash Catalyst and Flash Builder workflows
Create expressive interfaces and interactive content without writing code
Lameass feature. Photoshop sux. Apple could do so much better. The sooner Apple can kill off Adobe the better. Cmon Apple release your Photoshop killer already.